• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

1 million Chinese nationals in Singapore - How Many Ah Nehs ??

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
icon.aspx
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - 1 Million PRC Nationals Invade Singapore

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
From: Sutukudu <NOBR></NOBR>Jul-29 6:07 pm
To: ALL <NOBR></NOBR>(1 of 6)

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
54711.1
[h=2]1 million Chinese nationals in Singapore - How Many Ah Nehs ??[/h]Posted on July 29, 2011 by gdy2shoez
From eSingapore now home to 1 million PRCsf, 28 July 2011, article in insing.com
Netizens are in an uproar after a netizen received a letter stating that there are now nearly 1 million Chinese nationals in Singapore. This comes as a shock to many netizens, who until now, were not aware of the actual numbers of Chinese nationals in Singapore.The netizen had received a letter for his application to UnionPay, a Nets Value-added service.In the letter, UnionPay terms itself as gthe preferred mode of payment for the nearly 1 million Chinese nationals living and working/studying in Singaporeh.Many believe the stated numbers are accurate as UnionPay is a reputable multi-national company.cNetizens largely react with shock and dismay to this news, calling it a gstaggeringly huge numberh, others worry that the number of Chinese national immigrants will continue to increase, leading to further overcrowding in public transport.​
Unionpay is one of the largest issuers of debit/credit cards in China, and caters not only to the immigrant Chinese population here but tourists from the mainland as well. If one can assume that this data was mined from Chinese nationals who are clients of the bank, whatfs worrying is that this is really an an underestimate of the actual number of PRCs here if you factor in low wage workers, prostitutes, mail order brides or illegal immigrants who are unlikely to sign up for such cards. According to a SDP report eSfpore and foreign workersf, 11 Feb 2011Œ, there are already some 200,000 migrant Chinese employed as labourers here. So itfs not hard to imagine, if this information were in fact true, that we may have more than a million PRCs amongst us, further diluting the Singaporean identity but allowing us to epunch above our own weightf as LKY put it (Singapore canft punch above its own weight if it depends on local talent, 23 July 2011, Today)
For some time, the Singaporean has felt the competition from talented foreigners. But these are people who have come here to become our citizens and I am a firm believer that the more talent that you have in a society, the better the society will grow. gIf Singapore depends on the talent it can produce out of 3 million people, itfs not going to punch above its weight.chSo youfve got to accept the discomfort which the local citizens feel, that they are competing unequally for jobs. (It) cannot be helped.
So it cannot be helped that these migrants have brought their Third World habits with them. It canft be helped if they make terrible bus drivers because of their poor grasp of English. It canft be helped if furious locals go around slashing Chinese nationals for no rhyme or reason. It canft be helped if wefre crowded out of our wits on the trains. Like LKY said later in the article, we just have to eassuagef it, a case of eEasy for you to sayf, when he probably doesnft have to deal with social issues with migrants on a personal level. eAssuagef is defined as eto make an unpleasant feeling less intensef, which in the passive sense means etake it like a man and deal with itf, but you could also eassuagef a situation by doing something about it. In the case of the PRC slasher, he took the active sense of the word to the extreme, and the best advice that a man of LKYfs stature could give in response to how we deal with the inadvertent side effects of a pro-foreigner policy is to eassuage itf because it ecanft be helpedf, in the name of etalentf and egrowthf. It was a different tune sung by the same, great man in 1960 though (Wefve to close our doors a little, 2 June 1960, ST). But he changed his mind about casinos too. Still, itfs heartening to note that some Singaporeans are taking a stand to staunch this pro-China wave, with table tennis chief Lee Bee Wahfs refusal to field ex esure-winf PRCs for the SEA games, instead opting for local talent and risking a medal fallout. Perhaps our foreign stars should be given a reality check once in a while, that Singapore is not the dream diaspora destination that the government has so fervently promoted, that they have to slog and bear with disappointment like every one of us, and this move by the STTA is a true test of their staying power and how far their roots have sunk in.http://everythingalsocomplain.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/1-million-chinese-nationals-in-singapore/

<TBODY>
</TBODY>

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
 
Top