• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

馬英九 sentenced 4 month inprisonment for leaking secret

kangaroo

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/馬英九被訴洩密案-二審逆轉改判4月徒刑-020637664.html

馬英九被訴洩密案 二審逆轉改判4月徒刑

Yahoo奇摩(即時新聞)

10.7k 人追蹤
2018年5月15日 上午10:06
前總統馬英九被控洩密等案遭北檢起訴,一審獲判無罪。全案經上訴,二審台灣高等法院今天撤銷原判決,改判馬英九有期徒刑4月,可易科罰金,全案可上訴。

e92d2f39b0653be1250a57498a847bd1

前總統馬英九。(中央社/資料照)
全案起於已解散的最高法院檢察署特別偵查組,在民國102年偵辦民主進步黨籍立委柯建銘及當時的立法院長 王金平疑涉司法關說案。

台北地檢署起訴指控,馬英九在102年8月31日,明知調查司法關說案的「100特他61案」並非只是行政不法,仍洩漏偵查中秘密、柯建銘個人資料及通訊監察資料,給當時的行政院長江宜樺與總統府副秘書長羅智強。

此外,馬英九在102年9月4日,教唆當時的檢察總長黃世銘向江宜樺洩漏並交付偵查中的秘密及監察通訊所取得的應保密資料。

台北地方法院一審認為,馬英九構成洩密罪要件,但審酌馬英九是依憲法第44條行使專屬總統的爭議調解權而阻卻違法,在刑法上不罰,至於教唆洩密部分則罪證不足,106年8月25日判決馬英九無罪;台北地檢署不服提起上訴。

Ma Ying-Jiu was sued for leaking secret case
[Yahoo Kimo (Live News)]
Yahoo Kim (Instant News)
10.7k person tracking
May 15, 2018 10:06 AM

Former President Ma Ying-jeou was accused of leaking secrets and other cases were prosecuted by the North, and he was found not guilty in the first instance. After the case was appealed, the Taiwan High Court of Second Instance revoked the original judgment today, and sentenced Ma Ying-jeou to a fixed term of imprisonment in April. The penalties were subject to penalties and the entire case was open to appeal.
Former President Ma Ying-jeou. (Central News Agency/Photos)

The case began in the special investigation team of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court that had been dissolved. In the Republic of China in 102, Ke Jianming, the legislator of the Democratic Progressive Party, and Wang Jinping, the then president of the Legislative Yuan, were involved in judicial proceedings.

The Taipei Prosecutor's Office sued and charged that Ma Ying-jeou had known in August 31, 102 that the “100 Tetsu 61 Case” investigation of judicial clearance was not only an administrative misconduct, but still leaked secrets in investigations, Ke Jianming’s personal data, and communications monitoring materials. At that time, the Executive Yuan, Yihua Cheung, and Deputy Secretary-General of the Presidential Palace, Luo Zhiqiang.

In addition, Ma Ying-jeou on September 4, 102, instructed the then Attorney General Huang Shiming to leak Jiang Yihua and deliver the secrets of the investigation and to monitor the confidential information obtained by the communication.

The Taipei District Court held that Ma Ying-jeou constituted an element of disclosure, but he considered Ma Ying-jeou’s violation of the law in accordance with Article 44 of the constitution and exercised the exclusive power of the president’s controversy. There was no penalty in the criminal law, and there was insufficient evidence of the disclosure of the teachings. 106 years August 25 sentenced Ma Ying-jeou to acquittal; the Taipei Prosecutor's Office refused to accept the appeal.
 
Top