Taiwanese youth: Delay no further! Unification Now!
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-01-04/doc-ihqhqcis2934945.shtml
台湾青年:我们也很心急 统一不能再这么拖下去了
台湾青年:我们也很心急 统一不能再这么拖下去了
4,391
原标题:王炳忠:我们也很心急,统一不能再这么拖下去了
[文/观察者网专栏作者 王炳忠]
1
应观察者网之邀,请我谈谈对1月2日大陆纪念《告台湾同胞书》40周年大会的感想,动笔前的一刻,脸书又收到一名台大法律系网友的讯息,咒骂我是“滞台支那人”、“太平洋没加盖,要做中国人自己去”、“以为真的会和平统一,做梦”。。。。。。。一堆不堪入目的字眼,倒是最后一句说得有些道理,“和平”统一,可能吗?
也许你会说,像这种非理性的网友,哪里没有?何以特别举例?但记录显示,她曾在三年多年不断联系我,还曾来信向我示好,声称“这社会的声音应该更多元,希望我们都能让台湾更好”,却只因我公开发文肯定习近平“告台湾同胞书”40周年纪念讲话,就让她崩溃至此。
尤其是涌入我脸书的大批“绿卫兵”部队,更是集体歇斯底里,而且忽然都成了“中华民国”的捍卫尖兵。他们一下“你们不能代表台湾”,一下又“中国独裁侵害人权”,例子无非是不知哪儿炮制出的“维族集中营”,还有不断鬼扯根本不会传人的“猪瘟”将如何“感染”台湾人。。。。。。
以上种种,只说明两个事实:第一,这些人长年挟带优越感的所谓“台湾是多元社会”,其实一点也不“多元”。第二,习近平主席的演讲,谈不上什么“封锁”,更别说是“武力”,却已让岛内独派抓狂,蔡英文也不得不回应了!
2
当然,除了独派与蔡英文的激动,我听到更多的是一般台湾人对此展开热议,包括将来会是“和统”或“武统”的猜测。虽然主流媒体刻意压低了报导,不愿意“为对岸宣传”,但现在毕竟不是四十年前,两岸信息封锁的年代,是再也回不去了。
台湾民众开始讨论“和统”或“武统”,其实就是开始“谈统”,这实在本应是大陆早该做的事!什么事?就是大陆必须率先“打开天窗说亮话”,明白告诉台湾人谈统的重要,统一是不能回避的问题!而且,统一离我们并不遥远,不会是一代又一代拖延下去,就在你我有生之年,我们都将会看见。
习近平主席选在《告台湾同胞书》四十周年纪念会的重要讲话,正展现过去没有过的统一决心。也许一些朋友质疑,大陆从来都说统啊!但是,过去近十年的对台表述及做法,却让“务实的台湾人”判定“大陆没有要统”,只要用“九二共识”打混,而且还是“不统不独”的“九二共识”,大陆照样对台让利。
那么,在岛内宣扬必须面对统一、谈论统一的统派,岂不成了人人嘲笑的傻蛋了?“大陆都不谈统,你们谈什么呢?”
我一直说,台湾人是很务实的,因为民进党不认“九二共识”,两岸交流明显倒退,大家才会心知肚明,只有认同“九二共识”,“货才出得去,人才进得来”。那么,讲明白谈判统一的重要,台湾人也才知道,不能当作“统一”问题不存在,也才会产生对一国两制“台湾方案”的讨论。
3
于是蔡英文说,这是“分化台湾”的手段,要用三大“防护网”压制。但民进党自己标榜的,不就是多元社会?习近平主席倡议,坚持“九二共识”、反对“台独”的各政党、各界别都能推举代表来谈,听取对统一前制度安排的多元意见,这不正是倾听多元吗?
蔡英文也首次明确否定“九二共识”,撕毁了“未完成的答卷”。她的理由是,因为习近平主席的讲话,证实了多年来他们认为“九二共识”会落入“北京定义的一个中国、一国两制”的顾虑。
然而,民进党同时发表的声明,要求大陆正视“台湾是主权国家,名字叫中华民国”,不正也证实了海内外中国人的共同顾虑,那便是民进党和蔡英文所谓的“中华民国”,就是“台独”借壳的遮xiu布,用“中华民国”的挡箭牌来保护“台独”的神主牌?
蔡英文自创的“中华民国台湾”,当然也是如此。时至今日,竟直接透过台湾当局的“外交部”,向“国际社会”诉说对习近平主席讲话的回应,“中华民国台湾”忽而与“中国”对立,忽而又是“台湾是主权国家,未受中国管辖”,既是“务实台独”,又同时敲了“台独”的丧钟。
为什么?只因既是“台独”,怎又与“中华民国”这一中国政权牵扯不清?既不承认同属一中,却还要靠“一中”有无各表、如何表述大作文章,不正自己将从未出世的“台独”堕胎吗?
4
自国民党退守台湾后,台湾当局的历任领导人,尤其自蒋经国起,就都要同时给华府和北京交答卷。蒋经国为了国民党政权在台湾延续,认定不能和中共谈判,否则将失去统治正当性,却又向美国妥协,允许以“台独”作为党纲的民进党成立。他唯一向大陆的妥协,是在人伦亲情的压力下允许大陆探亲,而他也随即撒手人寰。
现在人人都说李登辉是国民党的叛徒,但一定程度上说,李登辉确实继承了蒋经国“革新保台”的偏安路线。只是“本土化”后的国民党,“三民主义统一中国”变成完全没灵魂的口号,最终也从国民党的论述消失,而江山也就这样拱手让人。
曾经让国民党重返执政的马英九,从过去的“终极统一”,在任时“不统、不独、不武”,卸任后“不排斥统一”,投机性昭然若揭。如今面对习近平讲话,又是“马办”称“谈统条件不成熟”,又是躲在幕后的“国民党内人士”放话说“两岸应该竞争出最适合中国人的制度”,甚至还有刚从美国回来的国民党“立委”,自欺欺人说“没什么新东西”。但我们就问中国国民党一句话:“从马英九执政加上这几年在野,你们到底说过中国人几次呢?”
还有,什么时候以国家统一为目标的“中华民国宪法”,变成“马办”所言只是“不排斥统一”呢?
5
这种话我已听了无数次,什么要我加入国民党、新党要回国民党、国民党已和大陆在谈和平协议。。。。。。那些对我说这话的人,甚至将此美其名为“曲线救国”。我真不敢想象,要是当时混入了国民党的大酱缸,2014年“太阳花”事件时,岛内还有哪个年轻人能出来发出反对之声?
这个道理很简单。如果大陆长期不积极直接对台湾人民说明主张,一切都通过岛内“不统不独”的政客及买办,甚至还自我限缩说是“不干预岛内事务”,结果放任台湾表面“不统不独”,实则“务实台独”,事态已严重到侵蚀中国的领土主权完整,难道还不“干预”吗?
如此一来,岛内陷入恶性循环,想夺得政权者绝口不提统一,对大陆则骗称“要先选上”,等选上后只要能忽悠得过,大陆也就“与之交流”,红利全落入这群政客、买办集团,黑锅由大陆来背,还因为长久没人谈统,自然也不会形成“谈统民意”。如果还要继续接受“选举结果”,那何不干脆接受“台独”?
6
我和多位统派学者,都曾向大陆对台智库反映这一情况,并以台湾民间都说“没有九二共识,地也没动,山也没摇”,来表达多数人不认为大陆真要求统。结果,竟还得到对方称“所谓地动山摇可能只是北方口语,不是真的会如何”,甚至回以“那就让大陆再多见见你们嘛”的奚落。
我们这些怀抱中国心的岛内爱国人士,不是计较领导人见我们几次面,而是统一真不能再这样拖延下去。我们不是帮助谁统谁,而是我们不甘继续被政客协同美日压榨,看着庞大军购拖垮经济,内斗内耗困死台湾。
回首台湾人从马关条约沦于日寇五十一年,又卷入国共内战与大陆对峙,现在大陆繁荣富强,我们为何不能加入中国复兴的行列?这是我们发自内心的呼声!更是我们在台湾的中国人应有的权利!
大陆如自认代表正统中国,怎能不担负起领导国家统一的责任?部分智库戏谑的回应,伤透了我们的心,如今习主席发出统一的号召,我们当然积极响应,也鼓励所有认同自己是中国人的台湾各界人士,一起加入一国两制“台湾方案”的讨论。
有人说,“一国两制”已是负面词汇,应该要换个提法。那“九二共识”、“一个中国”也被说是标签化,怎么办?说“两国论”最没争议?我们要正面请教,那些反对“一国两制”的人,你们究竟是反对“一国”,还是“两制”?如是反对“一国”,那就是“台独”分裂,没有得谈。如是反对“两制”,那是希望大陆的制度来统一台湾?还是妄想台湾的“民主”统一大陆,说了自己都很心虚?
2015年9·3阅兵,王炳忠在观礼台上
7
习主席的讲话,当然是开启了从“反独”进到“促统”的新时代,但隐忧仍在,而且不小。
因为过去不够耕耘直接和台湾民众的对话和沟通,现在纵使通过与台湾某党派、团体或人士协商,提出两岸在统一前和平稳定的制度方案,或能“出口转内销”使其迅速成为意见领袖,得到民意支持,扭转“想选上就不能谈统”的死循环,但时间上来得及吗?
从这样的政党、团体、人士选上“民代”,进到“立法机构”,有足够的人数形成党团,个个还要信仰坚定,愿意在岛内正面谈统,乃至夺得大位。。。。。。在台湾已长年“去中国化”、外加美国干预的现实土壤里,就算能够生根茁壮、开花结果,可预见的是必须经历一段阵痛期。
就算能经得住磨练,不为短线操作而投机取巧,真正在台宣扬统一理念,但美国也不会闲着,定会使尽浑身解数唆使、威胁蔡英文及任何竞选领导人的候选人不可“亲中(大陆)”,而面临党内逼gong及连任危机的蔡英文,也必然会为美国利用,乃至出现狗急跳墙。
正如伪满洲国听信日本关东军的蛊惑一样,甘为日本分裂中国的鹰犬,直到沦为战犯。金灿荣教授的警语不是不会发生:“时间在大陆这一边,但台独和美国右翼不愿等,他们都急着搞事儿,逼着我们不得不做出反应。”
唯一可能快速化解危机的,就是有希望夺回政权的国民党担起责任,提出以统一为目标的和平发展机制,就如刚刚过去的九合一大选,美国明摆着支持民进党,但最后国民党大胜,美国也就认,又忙着派人拉拢与国民党关系。一旦国民党真的和大陆谈和平协议,美国固然会亟力阻挠,但最后成了,也就认了。
然而,一向不擅于对抗“台独”“政治正确”的国民党,敢吗?马英九因卸任前突如其来的“习马会”,就被美国人视作“叛徒”。(去年随新党郁慕明主席访美,更有美国前对台官员嫌马不够强调“中国威胁”,是骗子。)面对现实已存在的“天然独”养分,国民党不怕挑战后便选不上吗?
8
最后,还有靠“两岸一家亲”与民进党区隔,但也因此受“独派”批斗的柯文哲。
柯文哲的投机性,或可提出比两大党灵活的政治提法,但也仅止于此。他不会主动引导民意谈统,但会很“务实”地把许多真相揭穿,尤其是塞在国民党和统派嘴里绝对会被说“卖台”的话,在他口中就自然得到不少“豁免”。
就像他曾说过的,如果武统真发生,那就先抵抗,“打不过,再投降”。
这也许就是台湾最后的宿命。不是说台湾岛内没有“统派”民意,而是“去中国化”毒素太深,大陆又信奉“不干预岛内事务”。如我在写这篇文章前,和朋友到熟悉的火锅店吃饭,老板儿子小我一岁,看了习主席讲话,告诉我:“中国和台湾真的是最亲近的两个‘国家’。美国一向自私自利,如果真要选择,我会选自己兄弟中国。”
虽然他表述的是“两国论”,但其实是“隐性统派”。我们自应对他循循善诱,但赶得上危机感日深的“台独”势力吗?
周边怀抱中国认同的台湾青年,十之八九都已移居大陆。就在返家的出租车上,又听到播放流行音乐的DJ,竟也不忘洗脑一段“台独”思想,说“我们是中华民国人或台湾人,本来就不是中国人”,所以“谁管什么中国人不打中国人”,“大陆不尊重我们不做中国人的选择,证明两岸一家亲是假的”。
这就是我这些年和同龄或年纪更小的台湾青年交流,深刻体会到的沉重悲哀。他们已在台湾二十余年的教育下,没有了中国人的同胞亲情,没有了中华儿女的文化认同,什么“每逢佳节倍思亲”、“历尽劫波兄弟在”的情感,他们都毫无共鸣。
剩下的,只有赤裸裸的现实利益,却又因长年对西方霸权的迷信,甚至对现实还产生“拒绝相信”或误判。令我不禁想起,2014年曾以统派代表身份和习主席座谈时,习主席便特别指出:“一旦教科书继续毒害台湾年轻人,以后孔夫子、关老爷都变外国人了!”
9
所以,在听完习主席讲话的振奋后,我们所面对的,仍是“浮云蔽白日”的台湾社会,仍是“道狭草木长”的台湾政局。媒体与各党谈论的,依旧是如何忽悠大陆,安抚美国,再讲些营销策略骗人之类的话。于是,自私自利的政客,有脸自称他们“爱台”,还倒过来指控我们“卖台”。毁弃“一中宪法”大搞“台独”的,更反过来用“国家安全”的大帽子,整肃我们这些爱国人士。
如今我们这些坚持“九二共识”、反对“台独”的新党青年军,以及中华统一促进党的总裁张安乐先生,都已经被蔡英文当局“限制出境”,不得离开台湾。其他多数的岛内政党及政客,但想求点功利,无不阉然媚世,顺从“台独”建立的“政治正确”发言。如此偏安败亡的景象,真是青史一幕幕,而今略有体会!
台湾人自两蒋时期被要求“保密防谍”、“反共复国”、“不接触、不谈判、不妥协”,到民进党又继续威胁“任何人不得与大陆进行政治协商”,并祭出“三大防护网”随时伺候。虽然处在这重重的压力下,但我仍要从心底吶喊:“尽最大力量促进以和平方式完成国家统一的正义事业,毕一生之力投身统一后的建设工作!”
我王炳忠,生于1987年两岸冰融新时代的台湾人,两岸统一的青年政治工作者,誓做顶天立地的男子汉,堂堂正正的中国人!
“冬来岭上一枝梅,叶落枯枝总不摧,探得阳春消息近,依然还我作花魁!”与所有岛内怀抱中国心的爱国人士共勉。
(2019年1月3日,凌晨四点,台北。)
Taiwanese youth: We are also very anxious. Unity can no longer be dragged on.
Taiwanese youth: We are also very anxious. Unity can no longer be dragged on.
4,391
Original title: Wang Bingzhong: We are also very anxious, and unity can no longer be dragged on.
[Text / Observer Network columnist Wang Bingzhong]
1
At the invitation of the Observer Network, please tell me about the impression of the 40th anniversary of the commemoration of the Taiwan Compatriots on January 2nd. At the moment before the slogan, Facebook received a message from a netizen of the National Taiwan University Law Department, cursing I am "the one who is stagnation of Taiwan", "the Pacific has not been stamped, and the Chinese have to go by themselves", "I thought it would be peacefully unified and dreamed." . . . . . . A bunch of unsightly words, but the last sentence is somewhat reasonable. Is it possible to "peace"?
Maybe you will say, like this irrational netizen, where is it? Why is it a special example? However, the records show that she has been in contact with me for more than three years. She has also written to me, claiming that "the voice of this society should be more yuan, I hope we can make Taiwan better", but only because I openly affirmed The commemorative speech of Xi Jinping’s 40th Anniversary of "Taiwan Compatriots" caused her to collapse.
In particular, the large number of "Green Guard" troops that flooded into my Facebook book were collectively hysterical, and suddenly they became the defenders of the "Republic of China." They said, "You can't represent Taiwan," and "China's dictatorship violates human rights." The example is nothing more than the "Uighur concentration camp" that I did not know where to make it, and how the "swine cockroaches" that will continue to sneak out will not "infect". Taiwanese. . . . . .
All of the above, only two facts are said: First, the so-called "Taiwan is a pluralistic society" that these people have a sense of superiority for many years is actually not "diverse". Second, President Xi Jinping’s speech can’t talk about “blockade”, let alone “force”, but it has already made the island’s independence mad, and Tsai Ing-wen has to respond!
2
Of course, in addition to the excitement of the independence and Tsai Ing-wen, I have heard more about the general Taiwanese people's hot debate on this, including the speculation that the future will be "harmony" or "wutong." Although the mainstream media deliberately lowered the report and did not want to "promote for the other side", but now it is not 40 years ago, the era of cross-strait information blockade is no longer able to go back.
The people of Taiwan began to discuss "harmony" or "wutong". In fact, it is the beginning of "talking about the system". This is really what the mainland should have done! what's up? It is the mainland that must take the lead in "opening the skylight and telling the story", understand the importance of telling Taiwanese people to talk about unity, and unity is a problem that cannot be avoided! Moreover, unity is not far away from us. It will not be delayed from generation to generation. It will be seen in the years of your life.
President Xi Jinping’s important speech at the commemoration of the 40th Anniversary of the Taiwan Compatriots is showing the unification of the past. Perhaps some friends have questioned that the mainland has always said that it is unified! However, in the past ten years, the practice of Taiwan’s representation has made the “pragmatic Taiwanese” judge that “the mainland does not have to be unified”, as long as it is mixed with the “92 Consensus”, and it’s still “not unified or not alone”. Consensus", the mainland still gives way to Taiwan.
Then, on the island, it is necessary to face the unity and talk about the unity of unity. Is it a fool who everyone laughs at? "The mainland does not talk about the system. What are you talking about?"
I have always said that the Taiwanese are very pragmatic because the DPP does not recognize the "92 Consensus" and cross-strait exchanges are clearly regressing. Everyone will know well. Only by agreeing with the "92 Consensus", "the goods can only go out." Talents come in." Then, to understand the importance of negotiating reunification, the Taiwanese only know that the issue of "unification" cannot exist and that there will be a discussion on the "Taiwan Plan" of one country, two systems.
3
So Tsai Ing-wen said that this is a means of "differentiating Taiwan" and it must be suppressed by three "protective nets". But the DPP’s own advertised is not a pluralistic society? President Xi Jinping advocated that all political parties and all political parties that adhere to the "1992 Consensus" and oppose "Taiwan independence" can vote for representatives and listen to the diversified opinions on the institutional arrangements before reunification. Isn't this just listening to pluralism?
For the first time, Tsai Ing-wen also clearly denied the "92 Consensus" and tore up the "unfinished answer sheet." Her reason is that because of President Xi Jinping’s speech, they confirmed that they believed that the "92 Consensus" would fall into the "one China, one country, two systems" definition of Beijing.
However, the DPP’s simultaneous statement demanded that the mainland face up to the fact that "Taiwan is a sovereign state and its name is the Republic of China." This also confirms the common concerns of the Chinese at home and abroad. That is, the DPP and Tsai Ing-wen "The Republic of China" is the "Taiwan independence" back cover of the xiu cloth, with the "Republic of China" shield to protect the "Taiwan independence" God's main card?
Of course, the "Republic of China Taiwan" created by Tsai Ing-wen is also true. To this day, he directly told the "international community" through the "Ministry of Foreign Affairs" of the Taiwan authorities that he responded to President Xi Jinping’s speech. "The Republic of China Taiwan" suddenly opposes "China" and suddenly "Taiwan is a sovereign state." Not subject to Chinese jurisdiction, it is not only "pragmatic Taiwan independence" but also the death knell of "Taiwan independence."
Why? Just because it is "Taiwan independence", how can it be unclear about the Chinese regime of the "Republic of China"? I don’t recognize the same affiliation, but I still have to rely on “one China” to have a table, how to express a big essay, or not to abort the “Taiwan independence” that I have never been born before?
4
Since the Kuomintang’s retreat to Taiwan, the successive leaders of the Taiwan authorities, especially since Chiang Ching-kuo, have to send copies to both Washington and Beijing. In order to continue the Kuomintang regime in Taiwan, Chiang Ching-kuo decided that he could not negotiate with the CCP. Otherwise, he would lose his legitimacy, but he would compromise with the United States and allow the DPP to be established as a party program with "Taiwan independence." His only compromise to the mainland was to allow the mainland to visit relatives under the pressure of the family's affection, and he immediately let go.
Everyone now says that Lee Teng-hui is a traitor to the Kuomintang, but to a certain extent, Lee Teng-hui has indeed inherited the Chiang Kai-shek's "innovation and protection of Taiwan". Only after the "localization" of the Kuomintang, "Three People's Principles of Unifying China" became a slogan that completely lacked souls, and eventually disappeared from the Kuomintang's discourse, and Jiangshan also made such a hand.
Ma Ying-jeou, who once returned the Kuomintang to the ruling, from the "ultimate reunification" of the past, "not unified, not alone, not martial" when he was in office, and "does not reject reunification" after leaving office, speculatively clear. Nowadays, in the face of Xi Jinping’s speech, it is also the “Ma Office” that “the conditions of the ruling is not mature”, and the “KMT’s insiders” who are hiding behind the scenes say that “the two sides should compete for the most suitable system for the Chinese” and even The Kuomintang "legislators" who have just returned from the United States have deceived themselves and said "nothing new." But we asked the Chinese Nationalist Party: "From Ma Ying-jeou's administration plus the past few years, how many times have you spoken about the Chinese?"
Also, when is the "Republic of China Constitution" aimed at national unity, and what is said to be "the Ma Office" is just "not to exclude reunification"?
5
I have heard this kind of words countless times. What should I join the Kuomintang and the New Party must return to the Kuomintang. The Kuomintang has already negotiated a peace agreement with the mainland. . . . . . Those who said this to me even called this "curve to save the country." I really can't imagine that if the Kuomintang's miso tank was mixed in at the time, when the "Sun Flower" event in 2014, which young man on the island could come out to make a voice of opposition?
The reason is simple. If the mainland does not actively and directly explain to the people of Taiwan for a long time, everything will pass through the politicians and compradors on the island that are "not unified and not independent", and even self-restricted and said that it is "not interfering with the affairs of the island". As a result, the Taiwanese surface is "not unified." "In fact, "practical Taiwan independence", the situation has been serious enough to erode China's territorial sovereignty, is it still not "intervention"?
As a result, the island is in a vicious circle. Those who want to win the political power do not mention reunification. For the mainland, they deceive that they must "choose first". If they can be fooled after the election, the mainland will "communicate with it". The dividends all fell into this group of politicians and comprador groups. The black pot was backed by the mainland, and because no one talked about it for a long time, naturally, it would not form a "talking to the public." If you still want to continue to accept the "election results," why not simply accept "Taiwan independence"?
6
I and a number of unified scholars have all reflected this situation to the mainland think tanks, and Taiwanese folks have said that "there is no 92 consensus, the land has not moved, and the mountains have not shaken" to express that most people do not think of the mainland. Really demanding. As a result, I was even told by the other party that "the so-called earth moving mountain shake may be just a spoken English in the north, not really what it will be", and even returning to the fall of "then let the mainland see you more often".
The patriots on the island who embrace China's heart are not counting on the leaders to see us several times, but the reunification cannot really be delayed. We are not helping anyone, but we are not willing to continue to be crushed by politicians in the United States and Japan, watching the huge military purchases drag the economy, and infighting Taiwan.
Looking back at the Taiwanese people from the Treaty of Shimonoseki in the fifty-one days of the Japanese, they were involved in the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party and confronted the mainland. Now that the mainland is prosperous and strong, why can we not join the ranks of China's rejuvenation? This is our voice from the heart! It is the right of Chinese people in Taiwan!
If the mainland believes that it is orthodox China, how can it not shoulder the responsibility of leading the country? The response of some think tanks has broken our hearts. Now President Xi has issued a unified call. Of course, we are actively responding. We also encourage all Taiwanese people who identify themselves to be Chinese to join the discussion on the "Taiwan Plan" of the one country, two systems.
Some people say that "one country, two systems" is already a negative vocabulary and should be replaced by a new one. The "92 Consensus" and "One China" are also said to be tabulated. What should I do? It is most controversial to say that the "two-state theory"? We must consult positively. Those who oppose "one country, two systems", are you against "one country" or "two systems"? If it is against "one country," it is a "Taiwan independence" split and there is no need to talk about it. If it is against the "two systems," is it hope that the mainland system will unify Taiwan? Still thinking about Taiwan’s "democracy" unifying the mainland, saying that he is very guilty?
At the 9·3 military parade in 2015, Wang Bingzhong was on the viewing platform at the 9th March of the 9th, and Wang Bingzhong was on the viewing platform.
7
President Xi’s speech, of course, has opened a new era of “anti-independence” to “promoting reunification”, but the hidden worry is still there, and not small.
Because in the past, it was not enough to directly engage in dialogue and communication with the Taiwanese people. Even now, through consultations with a certain party, group or person in Taiwan, the system of peace and stability before the reunification of the two sides of the strait can be proposed, or it can be “exported to domestic sales” to quickly become an opinion leader. With the support of the public, and to reverse the infinite loop of "I can't talk about the choice", but is it time to get it?
From such political parties, groups, and people, they choose the "people's generation" and enter the "legislative body." There are enough people to form a party group. Everyone must be faithful and willing to talk on the island and even win a big position. . . . . . In the real soil where Taiwan has been "de-sinuated" for a long time, plus the intervention of the United States, even if it can take root and blossom, it is foreseeable that it must go through a period of pain.
Even if you can withstand the tempering, not for the short-term operation and opportunistic, and truly promote the concept of unity in Taiwan, but the United States will not be idle, it will definitely try to do everything possible to threaten Tsai Ing-wen and any candidate for the election leader. "Pro-China (Mainland)", and Tsai Ing-wen, who faces a crisis in the party and re-election, will inevitably be used by the United States, and even a dog jumps.
Just as the Puppet Manchukuo listened to the enchantment of the Japanese Kwantung Army, it was the Japanese eagle dog that split China, until it became a war criminal. Professor Jin Canrong’s warnings will not happen: “Time is on the mainland side, but Taiwan independence and the US right wing are not willing to wait. They are anxious to do things and force us to react.”
The only thing that can quickly resolve the crisis is that the Kuomintang, which hopes to regain power, assumes responsibility and proposes a peaceful development mechanism with the goal of reunification. Just like the recent nine-in-one election, the United States clearly supports the DPP, but in the end the KMT wins. The United States also recognizes and is busy sending people to draw up relations with the Kuomintang. Once the Kuomintang really talks with the mainland on a peace agreement, the United States will certainly resist it, but in the end it will become recognized.
However, the Kuomintang, which has always been not good at confronting "Taiwan independence" and "political correctness", dare it? Ma Ying-jeou was regarded as a "traitor" by the Americans because of his sudden "Horse Club". (Last year, with the new party’s President Yu Muming’s visit to the United States, there are more American former Taiwan officials who are not enough to emphasize the “China threat” and are liar.) In the face of the existing “naturally unique” nutrients, the Kuomintang will not be able to choose after the challenge. ?
8
Finally, there is also Ke Wenzhe who is separated from the Democratic Progressive Party by the "cross-strait family" but is also subject to "independence".
Ke Wenzhe's speculativeness may suggest a more flexible political formulation than the two major parties, but it does not stop there. He will not take the initiative to guide the public to talk about the system, but he will expose many truths in a "pragmatic" manner. In particular, if he is said to be "selling Taiwan" in the Kuomintang and the reunification, he will naturally get a lot of "in his mouth." Exemption."
As he once said, if the martial arts really happen, then resist first, "can't beat, then surrender."
This may be Taiwan’s last fate. It is not that there is no "unification" of public opinion on the island of Taiwan, but that the "de-Chinaization" is too deep, and the mainland believes in "not interfering with the affairs of the island." For example, before I wrote this article, I went to a familiar hot pot restaurant to eat with my friends. The boss’s son, I was one year old, and read President Xi’s speech and told me: “China and Taiwan are really the two closest 'countries’. The United States has always been selfish. If you really want to choose, I will choose my brother China."
Although he expressed the "two-state theory," it is actually a "hidden sect." We have responded to his enthusiasm, but have been able to catch up with the "Taiwan independence" forces that have a deep sense of crisis?
Taiwan’s youth, who embrace China’s identity, have moved to the mainland in nine out of ten. Just on the taxi back home, I heard the DJ playing pop music, and I did not forget to brainwash a "Taiwan independence" thought, saying "we are Chinese people or Taiwanese, not originally Chinese," so "Who Regardless of what Chinese people do not fight Chinese people, "the mainland does not respect our choice of not to be Chinese, and prove that a family member on both sides of the strait is a fake."
This is the heavy sorrow that I have experienced in exchanges with young Taiwanese of the same age or younger age. They have been in Taiwan for more than 20 years of education, without the Chinese people’s family ties, without the cultural identity of the Chinese children, what are the emotions of “everything is going to be a good time” and “the brothers who are robbing the waves”, they are all No resonance.
The rest, only naked real interests, but because of the long-term superstition of Western hegemony, and even the reality of "rejection to believe" or misjudgment. I can't help but think that when I discussed with President Xi in the capacity of the representative in 2014, President Xi specifically pointed out: "Once the textbooks continue to poison young Taiwanese, Confucius and Guanzhong will become foreigners!"
9
Therefore, after listening to the excitement of President Xi’s speech, what we are facing is still the “Taiwanese society” that is “cloudy and white” and is still the political situation in Taiwan. What the media talks with the various parties is still how to fool the mainland, appease the United States, and then talk about marketing strategies to deceive people. Thus, self-serving politicians have their faces calling themselves "love Taiwan"