“夹着尾巴做官” officers' tails between their legs

[matamafia]

新华评论 > 正文
“夹着尾巴做官”
2012年01月09日 10:03:36
来源： 解放日报

新华微博

分享到腾讯微博 分享到qq空间
【字号：大 中 小】【打印】
【纠错】


有一句对于“公仆”的忠告，叫做 “夹着尾巴做官”。这句话不动听，甚至不中听，却是一条“做官”的规矩，更反映着对我们体制改革、制度建设的深层要求。

“夹着尾巴做官”，不是谨小慎微，不是畏首畏尾，更不是官场中的伪饰。“夹着尾巴做官”，就是常怀敬畏之心，就是常思执政之本，不能忘乎所以，更不能“胆大妄为”。

“夹着尾巴做官”，应当“怕”什么呢？就是要敬畏法律、敬畏组织、敬畏人民、敬畏舆论。这四个“敬畏”，说到底，就是有“法”有“天”。一是“法”，我们不但要讲依法执政、依法治理、依法办事，更重要的是做到法律面前人人平等、制度面前没有特权、制度约束没有例外。党要在宪法和法律的范围内活动，“公仆”更要有法律意识尤其是宪法自觉。二是“天”，天就是老百姓。“我们的权力是谁给的？”权为民所赋，是人民给的。“老百姓是山，老百姓是海”，老百姓不但是共产党永远的挂念，更是党执政合法性的源泉。我们要把权力来源搞清楚，才不会忘根本，才不会“天不怕地不怕”。总之，一个人民，一个法律，把这两条放在心间，才不会和尚打伞，“无法无天”。

说“夹着尾巴做官”，并不只是靠慎独。我们当然要讲自觉，讲“守住自己”，但这种自觉，从根本上说是来自制度，这种“坚守”，从深处来讲是对法制、体制的敬畏和自律。讲“夹着尾巴做官”，就要改变一些同志在当前情势下的一个“不适应”和一个“不习惯”。

改变“不适应”，就是要学会公开在透明的环境中执政。我们的社会，已经呈现出多元、多样的态势，不同利益、不同构成的公众，对于“知情权”的要求是一致的，把它当成自身权益保护和参与权、监督权的基本前提。我们有些同志不喜欢“透明”，倒不是说他们需要“暗箱操作”，以谋私利，而是对事事公开感到不舒服、不放心、不顺手，甚至充满担忧。这种执法习惯或曰执政方式看来已经落伍，不适应执政环境的深刻变化。事实上，只有“公开透明”，才能不但避免“内幕交易”，而且才能消除公众的猜忌和误解，更重要的是才能方便群众参与和监督。“君子坦荡荡，有话当面讲”，共产党人没有一己私利，所以不怕公开透明。公开是原则，不公开是例外。凡不涉国家机密、商业秘密和个人隐私，都应向社会公开，真正置我们的工作于公众监督之下。

改变“不习惯”，就是要改变一些同志在公众监督面前的不习惯。现在有些同志感到老百姓“难弄”，其中一条，是不适应群众的监督意识日益强化，是不习惯 “无数双眼睛注视”和“多少张嘴巴说话”那样一种工作环境。我们要尽快适应在公众监督下执政的规律，尤其要养成在众目睽睽下学习、工作和生活的习惯。这不仅是因为我们的“公仆”从某种意义上来说属于“公众人物”，所谓“隐私权”要比普通人来得少，更是因为人民的监督权，是保障权力不蜕变不异化的 “常流活水”和根本杠杆。我们要习惯于在民主监督下“夹着尾巴做官”——这可是推进和实现执政方式现代化的一个大要求呵。凌河

 

[matamafia]

Re: “夹着尾巴做官” officers' tails between their legs

For there is a "public servant" advice, called the "official tail between its legs." This sentence does not sound appealing, even unpleasant, but it is an "official" rules, but also reflects on our system, the construction of deep system requirements.

"Turn tail an official", not cautious, not timid, but not official in Wei Shi. "Turn tail official" is Changhuai awe, is often thought of the ruling can not be carried away, but not "reckless."

"Turn tail an official," should "fear" what? Is the fear of the law, fear of the organization, people fear, fear of public opinion. The four "awe" in the final analysis, there is this "law" with "days." First, the "law", we not only talk about the law governing according to law, according to the law, more importantly, so that everyone is equal before the law, no privileges before the system, the system constraint is no exception. Party to the Constitution and laws within the scope of "public servants" should have the conscious awareness of the law, especially the Constitution. The second is "days", days is people. "Who is our power to it?" Rights conferred by the people, is given by the people. "People are mountain people is the sea", people always miss not only the Communist Party, is the source of the legitimacy of the ruling party. We need to figure out the source of power, it simply will not forget, it will not "scary." In short, a people, a law, these two on the heart, it will not be a monk holding an umbrella, "lawlessness."

Say "turn tail an official," not just rely on Maintenance. Of course we talk about consciousness, say, "hold their own," but this consciously, from the fundamentally from the system, this "commitment" from the depths of the terms is legal, institutional fear and self-discipline. Say "turn tail an official," we must change some of the comrades in the current situation under a "inappropriate" and a "not used to."

Change "inappropriate", is to learn to open and transparent environment in the ruling. Our society has shown a diverse variety of situation, different interests, different composition of the public, for the "right to know" requirements are the same, regard it as their own rights, protection and participation rights, the basic premise to supervise. Some of our comrades do not like the "transparent", not that they need "secret operations" to its own interest, but to every public feel uncomfortable, do not worry, not easily, or even full of concern. This custom or law enforcement seems to have become obsolete, saying governance, profound changes in the environment not suited to the ruling. In fact, the only "open and transparent" in order to not only avoid the "insider trading" and to dispel public suspicion and misunderstanding, more importantly, to facilitate public participation and supervision. "Gentlemen expansive, have something to say face to face talk", the Communists did not their own interests, so afraid of open and transparent. Open in principle, do not open is an exception. Which do not involve state secrets, commercial secrets and personal privacy, should be made public, the real home of our work under the supervision of the public.

Change the "not used" is to change some of the comrades are not used in front of public scrutiny. Some comrades feel that people are now "hard to get" one, is not suited to the growing sense of strengthening the supervision of the masses, is used to "countless pairs of eyes watching" and "How many mouths to speak" as a working environment. We have to adapt to the public under the supervision of the law governing, in particular, to develop in full view of learning, working and living habits. This is not only because of our "public servants" in a sense a "public figure", so-called "privacy" far less than the average person, but because the people of the supervisory authority is to protect the power of alienation does not decay. " steady flow flowing water "and the fundamental lever. We are accustomed to the democratic supervision, "an official tail between its legs" - this is to promote and implement modern governance demands a big Oh. Linghe