Believe it or not, the hard truth is that both the US and UK governments are the slaves of the Israeli government (because of certain powerful US, UK, French and German Jews and their trustworthy "Gentile" collaborators), who is one of the staunchest allies of the Sinkie government and the Japanese government.Btw slave of the US govt is better or not?
Therefore, ironically, it is the combined power of Israel+Japan+Singapore that outranks the "mighty" USA!
The fact that the US military has been protecting both Singapore and Japan so far proves that it is the US government that is serving the Sinkie government and the Japanese government, and not the other way round.
And this is because if the US government really abandons East Asia, the chance of Japan rearming itself would be 100% (I'm now more convinced than before, when I only said "good chance"), just like what Germany did before WW2, as I've said before in another thread:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?237975-Next-four-years-America-would-not-even-bother-with-Singapore&p=2537761#post2537761
And this time, nothing will stop Japan from exercising its "Japan Option":...in the eyes of the Japanese "elite" ruling class, Singapore has always been, and will always be:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Syonan-To
(i.e. 昭南島, Shōnan-tō, meaning "Light of the South")
So even if the whole world abandons Syonan-To, I doubt Japan would abandon their beloved "Light of the South". :p
If the USA really abandons both Northeast and Southeast Asia, I suspect there is a good chance that Japan will rearm themselves (including buying, or even manufacturing, their own nuclear weapons!), just like what Germany did nearly a century ago:
wikipedia.org/wiki/German_re-armament
After that, Japan's:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Maritime_Self-Defense_Force
will revert to their glorious:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Japanese_Navy
Even their Naval Ensigns are the same:
Naval Ensign of Japan
Naval Ensign of the Empire of Japan
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?238144-Terrex-AFV-confiscation-in-HKG-The-Implications-and-Revelations&p=2540610#post2540610
Always remember that QUALITY always TRUMPS quantity!And in my opinion again, the Japanese military are superior to the U.S. military, and can only be defeated if both China and the USA gang up to attack Japan, like what happened during the last few years of World War 2.
Otherwise, if it's just a one-on-one between Japan and China or between Japan and the USA, Japan will probably win, especially since it's a:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_nuclear_weapon_program#De_facto_nuclear_state
wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_latency
("Nuclear latency is the condition of a country possessing the technology to quickly build nuclear weapons, without having actually yet done so. Because such latent capability is not proscribed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, this is sometimes called the "Japan Option" (as a work-around to the treaty), as Japan is a clear case of a country with complete technical prowess to develop a nuclear weapon quickly, or as it is sometimes called "being one screwdriver's turn" from the bomb, as Japan is considered to have the materials, expertise and technical capacity to make a nuclear bomb at will.")
which is why I doubt China will actually dare to significantly hurt Japan and/or any of Japan's allies, such as, and especially, Singapore!
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_disasters
("In this list a military disaster is the unexpected and sound defeat of one side in a battle or war, sometimes changing the course of history.
Military disasters in this list can range from a strong army losing a major battle against a clearly inferior force, to an army being surprised and defeated by a clearly superior force, to a seemingly evenly matched conflict with an extremely one sided result. A military disaster could be due to bad planning, bad execution, bad weather, general lack of skill or ability, the failure of a new piece of military technology, a major blunder, a brilliant move on the part of the enemy, or simply the unexpected presence of an overwhelming enemy force.")
Last edited:
.
