Dear 
@sbfuncle, 
many belated thanks again for your reply! 
 
I'm willing to say that, 
at most, it's 
possible that Madam Gan 
never made any of those police reports and, therefore, it's 
possible that she was lying (when 
she said she made them); but I'm afraid 
I feel a strong need to 
also say that it's 
both possible and even 
more probable that she 
really did make those police reports (or 
at least talked to the police both over the phone and even in person), so I hope 
you won't mind me considering 
your suspicion to be 
less probable!  
But, of course, 
I'm aware of 
her many lies; and so, 
I certainly consider the 
contents of her reports to be filled with 
lies mixed with some 
truths, because I believe she's a 
very malicious/psychopathic/cunning hypocrite, who has a 
very strong desire to 
hurt innocent people (both male and female, especially if they are 
weaker; or if they are 
actually stronger, but 
she mistakenly thinks that they are 
"weaker" or thinks that 
she is the one who is 
"stronger", she would 
still try to hurt them), in order to 
feed her vanity/conceit/arrogance! 
In fact, 
I dare say that there's at least a 
69% chance that 
if Sinkies were 
allowed to 
buy and use guns in 
Singapore for "self-defence", 
Madam Gan would have 
bought at least one gun (or even two or more guns) many years ago and would have 
already murdered at least 
one innocent person (whether male or female) by now, while 
falsely accusing that innocent person of "threatening" her "first"! 
Anyway, here's 
my reasoning (which is quite 
long-winded, so 
please bear with me!  ):
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-3.pdf
parliament.gov.sg/sconlinefalsehoods
As you can see, 
her full name is on 
one of the webpages of the 
Sinkie Parliament's website, which 
proves that she not only 
dared to report her lies to the 
PAP government (back in early 2018, nearly 8 years ago), but she's 
willing to 
reveal her full name to the government and to anyone else who feels like reading that webpage, even though it was 
not necessary for her to reveal it; for example, here are three "written representations" by "Anonymous":
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-20.pdf
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-111.pdf
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-168.pdf
and here's a "written representation" by "Erwin":
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-7.pdf
and finally, here's a "written representation" by "Valerie":
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-70.pdf
Also, the 
PAP government 
has always been, still is, and will always be, a 
far-from-perfect government (simply because it's just 
not possible for them, and 
also any other political party/coalition in the 
entire world, to be even 
close to perfect), even if some people (both Sinkies and non-Sinkies) consider it to be the "best" government in the world.
Therefore, it's not only 
possible, but even 
highly probable, that the 
PAP government and/or the 
Sinkie police (who are 
slaves of the PAP government) 
have never, and will never, charge every single criminal who has 
ever committed at least one crime in Singapore (especially if the crime is a 
small one, such as what 
Madam Gan has been doing many times, and it would 
not even be necessary to 
bribe the Sinkie police), even if the former have enough evidence to charge the latter; and 
I believe/suspect that 
Madam Gan is probably aware of this fact, especially since 
Sinkie women have been:
1. 
taught/trained, since they were 
Primary schoolgirls, to 
trust the Sinkie police, who will 
also trust them back;
2. and even 
encouraged to call them whenever they 
feel the need to! 
Furthermore, 
unless I'm mistaken, during the 
past couple of decades, the 
vast majority of 
Sinkie prisoners (i.e. 
not foreigners, but Sinkie 
citizens who have 
committed crimes in Singapore and who have been convicted and imprisoned) have been living in:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Changi_Prison_Complex (CPC)
which has a capacity of only "11,000", 
including 
only about 
a thousand female prisoners, who were moved from the old "Changi Women’s Prison" (at "10 Tanah Merah Besar Road, Singapore 498834") to CPC's "Cluster A and renamed to Institution A4" in 2017 (roughly 8 years ago):
sps.gov.sg/resource/media-releases/notice-relocation-of-changi-women-prison
And according to:
wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Singaporean_general_election
there were "2,758,846" 
registered voters several months ago, so let's 
round down that number to 
2.69 million adult Sinkie citizens (including possibly, and probably, close to 
half a million adult citizens who became "new citizens" 
from the 1990s onwards, when Goh Chok Tong was the Prime Minister), who are 
alive right now. 
My point is that if just 
0.69% of the 2.69 million adult Sinkie citizens were to 
become prisoners right now, that's 
18,561 prisoners and the PAP government would 
not have enough prison cells for them; and the PAP would also 
look bad if the 
Sinkie police were to report a 
significantly higher crime rate, right?
This is why, in 
Madam Gan's case, the simple fact that she has 
never been punished for 
lying to the Sinkie Parliament (back in early 2018) probably 
emboldened her to 
continue lying to the 
Sinkie police until this year! 
By the way, I'm 
beginning to suspect that many years ago (possibly 
before she started working for Singapore Flying College in 2006 when she was roughly 35/36 years old), when she 
successfully annulled her marriage, she (and probably also her ex-husband) 
lied to their lawyer and the judge (obviously in order to 
convince him/her to annul her marriage) and their lawyer and the judge 
simply agreed with them, in order to 
earn their money!
As for why she and her ex-husband 
chose to annul rather than divorce, 
one of their main reasons might be the fact that 
an annulment is usually cheaper than a divorce:
google.com/search?q=is+it+cheaper+to+annul+or+divorce+in+singapore
In conclusion, I think it's 
safe to say that the 
chance of Madam Gan 
really making those 
malicious police reports (or 
at least talked to the police either over the phone or in person) is 
at least 69% (or even 96.9%), 
but the 
contents of her reports were obviously filled with 
lies mixed with some 
truths, similar to how she 
mixes truth with lies in 
many of her posts on her Facebook page:
facebook.com/siokbin.gan
and here at sammyboy.com; for example:
1. those posts in which she 
falsely accused some men of 
whistling AT HER (in order to "sexually harass" her), while 
telling the truth that she 
did indeed hear, and even 
see, them 
whistling!
2. and of course, those posts in which she mentioned 
talking to the police or 
making police reports, especially in her 
Facebook posts, because they obviously 
received much fewer views and her 
main objective was to 
complain to:
facebook.com/k.shanmugam.page
and 
not to attract attention from anyone else, 
unlike 
whenever she spammed here at sammyboy.com, right?
Basically, Madam Gan is one of those 
outstandingly vain/conceited/arrogant/domineering/overbearing, overconfident, complacent, cunning, hypocritical, shameless, malicious and psychopathic women who have 
very strong desires to 
hurt innocent people (both male and female, especially if they are 
weaker; or if they are 
actually stronger, but 
she mistakenly thinks that they are 
"weaker" or thinks that 
she is the one who is 
"stronger", she would 
still try to hurt them)!

Therefore, I 
strongly advise anyone (who has bothered to read this 
long-winded post of mine! 
 ) to 
beware of her in real life and to 
stay far away from her; and 
just in case anyone is 
not aware of how 
her face looks like, here are 
four photos of her 
middle-aged Hokkien Chinese Sinkie face that 
she herself posted on 
her Facebook page a few months ago:
sammyboy.com/threads/fabulous-babe-madam-gan-颜-siok-bin-淑敏-seems-to-have-finally-changed-her-facebook-profile-picture-to-a-photo-of-her-beautiful-face.389500

By the way, I'm aware that 
some people might consider her to be a "fabulous babe" with a "beautiful" face!

But 
please do 
not be deceived by 
her/her face; and 
always remember the following 
saying/words of wisdom:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_judge_a_book_by_its_cover