S
Summer
Guest
http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/Story/STIStory_770431.html
Published on Feb 25, 2012
/
RECENTLY, I was shocked after Standard Chartered Bank approved my application for two credit cards, offering a credit limit of $100,000 for the cards.
The limit was surprising because my salary is between $10,000 and $11,000 a month.
I am concerned because I was under the impression that banks have a stringent credit evaluation process for card applications.
Add this $100,000 credit bonanza to the limits of other cards I hold, and I am suddenly transformed into a person with enormous borrowing bandwidth. I am uncomfortable because having so much credit is a temptation to buy things I cannot afford.
When I logged on to the bank's online portal to raise my concerns and to seek an immediate reduction of the credit limit to between $20,000 and $30,000, I was told to write to the bank's headquarters.
The requirement is baffling because it gives the impression that the bank is trying to discourage me from practising financial prudence and wants me to accept its credit limit.
Certainly, the bank may have been trying to exercise caution by getting me to prove my identity by writing in. But if I could log on to its portal with a PIN and password, and authenticate myself with a one-time password, and use the secure mailbox services within the portal to make a request, how could I possibly not be the credit card holder?
Why must the bank rely on snail mail to facilitate my request?
While I know some may welcome the bank's generosity, I belong to the segment of credit card holders who believe that we must be able to repay what we buy on credit.
Eric Tan
Published on Feb 25, 2012
/
RECENTLY, I was shocked after Standard Chartered Bank approved my application for two credit cards, offering a credit limit of $100,000 for the cards.
The limit was surprising because my salary is between $10,000 and $11,000 a month.
I am concerned because I was under the impression that banks have a stringent credit evaluation process for card applications.
Add this $100,000 credit bonanza to the limits of other cards I hold, and I am suddenly transformed into a person with enormous borrowing bandwidth. I am uncomfortable because having so much credit is a temptation to buy things I cannot afford.
When I logged on to the bank's online portal to raise my concerns and to seek an immediate reduction of the credit limit to between $20,000 and $30,000, I was told to write to the bank's headquarters.
The requirement is baffling because it gives the impression that the bank is trying to discourage me from practising financial prudence and wants me to accept its credit limit.
Certainly, the bank may have been trying to exercise caution by getting me to prove my identity by writing in. But if I could log on to its portal with a PIN and password, and authenticate myself with a one-time password, and use the secure mailbox services within the portal to make a request, how could I possibly not be the credit card holder?
Why must the bank rely on snail mail to facilitate my request?
While I know some may welcome the bank's generosity, I belong to the segment of credit card holders who believe that we must be able to repay what we buy on credit.
Eric Tan