• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Apple iPhone RIP-OFF sucker buyers

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
5,769
Points
48
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/10/07/apple_initiates_pre_orders_for_iphone_4s.html

The 16GB, 32GB and 64GB iPhone 4S models sell for $199, $299 and $399, respectively, with a 2-year contract in the U.S.

http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-iphone-4s-16gb-and-32gb-and-64gb/
Difference Between iPhone 4S 16GB and 32GB and 64GB

Oct 4th, 2011 | By Andrew

iPhone 4S 16GB vs 32GB vs 64GB | Speed, Features and Performance

Apple releases iPhone 4S today with Apple A5 Processor and iOS 5.iPhone Prices are comparatively cheaper than iPhone 4. iPhone 4S comes with difference memory capacity and color to cater the wide range of user market. iPhone 4S mainly packed with 16GB,32GB and 64 GB internal memory. This is basically storage capacity only and which is not going to affect any speed or performance. Prices differ depends on the internal memory capacities.

What does the prices say? RIP-OFF memory prices! literally!

There is no other differences except of more flash memory capacities between the iPhone models priced US$199 US$299 & US$399

So Apple is making sucker customers pay extra US$100 for just another 16GB of flash memory or extra U$200 for another 48GB.

What does the maths say? That is @US$6.25/GB and $4.17/GB respectively for different models.

THAT IS RIP-OFF! No wonder there is US$76 billion in bank A/C of Apple Inc!

They are another Wall Street?:rolleyes::eek::*:

Read on the market prices of flash memory it is just about and slightly below @US$1/GB when Apple Inc sell them to sucker buyer @US$6.25/GB & @$4.17/GB dozens of millions of suckers will pay!

20061229144745155.gif


http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9180943/NAND_flash_memory_pricing_to_plummet_to_1_per_GB

NAND flash memory pricing to plummet to $1 per GB
Drop in 3-bit-per-cell NAND flash will jumpstart SSD sales, says iSuppli
By Lucas Mearian
August 19, 2010 12:27 PM ET

Computerworld - After two years of inflated prices, NAND flash memory prices are expected to dip down to a key $1 per gigabyte level, according to a new report by research firm iSuppli.

The precipitous drop marks the first time NAND flash pricing has fallen to the $1 per GB threshold since the fourth quarter of 2008, when consumer-class NAND pricing averaged 90 cents per GB.

Skyrocketing NAND flash prices last year subdued what had been a booming solid state drive (SSD) market. The price of flash memory chips rose to $4.10 per GB in the second quarter of last year.

Pricing for NAND flash memory had been expected to flat-line until next year, when NAND flash chip fabricators will be able to reinvest their profits to ramp up production and begin selling higher-density products, industry experts say.

But in a report released today, iSuppli forecasts that NAND flash pricing for 3-bit-per-cell NAND will average $1.20 per GB for the entire fourth quarter and will then drop to $1 by the end of this year. The $1 per GB level is considered a threshold that will drive adoption of solid state drives, iSuppli stated.

The recent price drop is reflected in the first quarter of 2010, when pricing for 3-bit-per-cell (or triple-level cell) NAND averaged $1.80 per GB and 2-bit per cell flash was at $2.05, iSuppli stated.

"When NAND pricing first fell below the $1 level at the end of 2008, many observers opined that it would sound the starting gun for solid state storage, allowing the technology to be cost competitive with hard disk drives in PCs for the first time," Michael Yang, iSuppli senior analyst for memory and storage, said in a statement. "However, during the following quarters, pricing rose because of strong demand and constrained production capacity, limiting the appeal of SSDs to low-volume servers in data centers and preventing widespread adoption in high-volume business and consumer PCs."

Objective Analysis research analyst Jim Handy disagreed with iSuppli's forecast, saying NAND flash memory is still suffering from a shortage and that prices are going to stay "pretty flat till the second half of next year".

"Then they will drop ... darn fast. The cost of the just-announced Intel/Micron 25nm, three-bit NAND should be 40 cents per gigabyte once volume is reached," he said. "In other words, I disagree greatly with iSuppli. So does history."

Objective Analysis came out with a report earlier this week that also stated SSDs are poised for rapid growth in certain niche markets.

The report, Solid State Disk Market Outlook 2010, states that while SSDs haven't found widespread acceptance in general-purpose PCs, those applications that benefit from this technology will drive the server SSD market to grow at an impressive 60% year over year rate.
1
2
3
Next page


SSDs could fall below $1 per GB by the end of the year
by Pete Mason on 20 August 2010, 13:14

Tags: iSuppli

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qazny


Solid-state drives may offer incredible speeds, but for the most part, the cost of admission is prohibitively high. According to market-research firm iSuppli, though, prices are set to drop dramatically towards the end of this year to as little as $1/GB (£0.64).

A big driving force in the decreasing cost of NAND is said to be the abundant availability of triple-level-cell (TLC) chips, which allow for higher storage-densities than SLC and MLC memory. This could lead to flash memory being cheaper than it has been since the end of 2008, following which NAND saw a dramatic price increase to over $2 per GB at the end of last year.

Hopefully these shifts in the market price will make their way to consumers, making smaller SSDs affordable to the masses and higher-capacity models more than just a pipedream. If the predictions come to pass, we could see 32GB and 40GB drives costing less than £50 for the first time.

However, senior analyst Michael Yang thinks it may be too little, too late, commenting that "traditional HDDs gained a lot of additional ground during the past few years in terms of rising capacity and falling prices. In fact, HDDs have gained so much ground that SSDs now are in danger of never regaining their competitive footing".

With capacity continuing to increase, it's unlikely that hard drives will be disappearing any time soon, but as prices fall, SSDs will start to look more and more attractive.

How cheap will SSDs have to get before you will be convinced to take the plunge? Let us know in the HEXUS.community forums.


nandprices.jpg


Related Reading
Buffalo launches DriveStation Velocity
App store revenue to almost double this year, most of it Apple
Plextor expands SSD line-up
iSuppli: smartphone market shrank in Q1
Intel gains chip share in Q1 despite recall
Corsair ships 480GB Force Series SSDs
Apple is the world’s biggest OEM semiconductor buyer
Redefine the Meaning of Speed with Plextor SSDs
Corsair Announces Major Advance in High-Capacity SSDs
Japan crisis stops a quarter of global silicon wafer production

HEXUS.community :: Latest Comments
 
Last edited:
http://vr-zone.com/pricewatch/pricelists/fuwell/1

Latest SLS price list showing USB flash you can calculate from there S$ or US$ per GB.

Why can Apple rip off buyers?

Simply because they had DESIGNED NO MEMORY CARD SLOT on their iPhones!

That's all!

You can not buy any flash memory card to upgrade iPhone memories and thus have to be deprived to be ripped off exclusively by Apple Inc at 5 time the prices of normal flash memories.
 
Steve Jobs lived in a rotten haunted home (Spanish Colonial era run down house):

http://news.xinhuanet.com/photo/2011-10/07/c_122124744.htm

破旧如鬼屋:曝乔布斯"简陋"豪宅内景

2011年10月07日 15:06:45 | 责任编辑: 夏欣 | 来源:光明网 [新华网图片频道RSS要闻汇总] [查看原图] [复制URL到MSN或QQ好友] [打印]

  在一片唏嘘与惊讶之中,苹果公司传奇合伙创始人、顶级决策者史蒂夫-乔布斯24日辞去该公司首席执行官一职。苹果公司在一份书面声明中宣布,该公司首席运营官蒂姆-库克将接任首席执行官一职,乔布斯仍将担任公司董事会主席。


破旧如鬼屋! 曝乔布斯"简陋"豪宅内景

  说到乔布斯的这栋“豪宅”,其实它非常有历史,该豪宅建于1925年,已经有84年的历史。位于加利福尼亚州最为富有的市镇之一——伍德塞德市,占地面积为17250平方英尺,是西班牙殖民地时期的产物。主人是当时的名人丹尼尔·考恩·杰克林(Daniel Cowan Jackling)。

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>|


122124744_1551n.jpg



122124744_1561n.jpg


破旧如鬼屋! 曝苹果教主乔布斯"简陋"豪宅内景

  在1984年,苹果CEO史蒂夫·乔布斯买下了这座豪宅,有30个房间,有14个卧室,当然还有宽大的客厅。不过现在这栋豪宅已经破旧不堪,过去10年一直无人居住打理,年代已久则是破旧的另一个原因。乔布斯希望把这座房子夷为平地,并重新建一座更现代化的小豪宅。但反对者认为这房子就是文物,有各方面的价值,不能随便拆。想想比尔·盖茨自己设计的现代化豪宅,再看看这栋破旧不堪的房子,乔布斯还真有些郁闷,更令他难受的当然是——明明是自己房却不能拆。


122124744_1571n.jpg

破旧如鬼屋! 曝苹果教主乔布斯"简陋"豪宅内景
122124744_1581n.jpg


122124744_1591n.jpg



122124744_1611n.jpg


乔布斯破旧豪宅

122124744_1601n.jpg



122124744_1621n.jpg


church organ!
122124744_1631n.jpg


122124744_1641n.jpg


122124744_1651n.jpg

破旧如鬼屋! 曝苹果教主乔布斯"简陋"豪宅内景

No alterations needed to shoot a Vampire Movie here:
122124744_1661n.jpg


122124744_1671n.jpg


122124744_1681n.jpg


122124744_1691n.jpg


122124744_1701n.jpg


LKy should be moved in here ASAP! :D Tear down Oxley road & move here!
122124744_1711n.jpg


122124744_1721n.jpg


122124744_1731n.jpg


122124744_1741n.jpg


122124744_1751n.jpg


122124744_1761n.jpg


Perfect sweet home for LKy!
:D
 
Alamaking
Alamaking is offline Alfrescian (Inf) My Reputation: 1320



Default Re: Apple iPhone RIP-OFF sucker buyers

Then get the lowest space 1 lor, LOL

I recommend Andriod for the time being.

Google Inc is another monopoly taking over the place of MS.

I hope some others implement some other version of open source handphone keeping some compatibility with Andriod.
 
Last edited:
I agree with you.

I recommend Andriod for the time being.

Google Inc is another monopoly taking over the place of MS.

I hope some others implement some other version of open source handphone keeping some compatibility with Andriod.
 
I agree with you.

I actually also recommend designers to implement my concept of Tandem Screens in place of tablets.

What I meant is 1 or 2 or 3 more touch screens that can be connected to smart phones to provide a larger touch screen, but with small seams between. That let the users buy the smart phone either alone or with 1 or 2 more Tandem Screens as optional add-on.

Each screen is a touch screen but with additional battery inside. Can be joint by connector to smart phones and can be joint by flexible flat cables so folding is possible. They have to be very slim and light. Got nothing except touch screen + battery.

;):rolleyes::cool:
 
Back
Top