Budwig Diet- Meals that are anti-cancer, anti-diabetic...

[tonychat]

Bro, you repeatedly keep falling for scams. Nominations for Nobel prize is never revealed including to the nominees. The whole thing is sealed for 50 years. Thousands of invitations are sent out each years to qualified individuals around the world. How she ended up with 7 nominations is now urban legend.

Maybe for start you can show a reliable reference on the nobel prize nominations.

I do understand how you feel. Dun be bitter. Sinkie never get any noble prize winnings at all but that does not mean it is a scam.

 

[johnny333]

Bro, you repeatedly keep falling for scams......

Instead of attacking her credentials why not focus on her protocol, what critique have you got against her protocol I'm recommending her protocol based on it's reputed effectiveness & cost. Anyone in Spore can follow the protocol as you just need cottage cheese, flax oil, flax seed & a blender, avoid processed foods, etc

She advocates eating fresh & avoiding processed foods. Isn't this common sense
Of course you need to take the time & trouble to prepare these foods

From the many health books I've read many of her recommendations have stood the test of time & are today these views are commonly shared by the health community
There is more to her protocol e.g. oleolux an alternative to butter ( using flax oil, coconut, onions), sauerkrate juice, raw salads, buckwheat, garlic, steamed vegetables, champagne with linomel, etc


I looked up "scam" and came up with "scam is a dishonest attempt to trap you into parting wth your money". I'm getting most of my ingredients from NTUC Damn those scammers

 

[tonychat]

Instead of attacking her credentials why not focus on her protocol, what critique have you got against her protocol I'm recommending her protocol based on it's reputed effectiveness & cost. Anyone in Spore can follow the protocol as you just need cottage cheese, flax oil, flax seed & a blender, avoid processed foods, etc

She advocates eating fresh & avoiding processed foods. Isn't this common sense
Of course you need to take the time & trouble to prepare these foods

From the many health books I've read many of her recommendations have stood the test of time & are today these views are commonly shared by the health community
There is more to her protocol e.g. oleolux an alternative to butter ( using flax oil, coconut, onions), sauerkrate juice, raw salads, buckwheat, garlic, steamed vegetables, champagne with linomel, etc


I looked up "scam" and came up with "scam is a dishonest attempt to trap you into parting wth your money". I'm getting most of my ingredients from NTUC Damn those scammers

He just cannot take it when someone is so much better than him. That is another typical sinkie behavior.

 

[scroobal]

You made some claims over the years and where there are no scientific evidence or research backing them out, I have pointed it out. You are making recommendations which are false and misleads innocent and desperate people. As these claims refer to serious illness you can imagine people will try anything at significant cost. In this case it is minor.

I have categorically stated that Nobel prize nominations are never revealed. The whole thing is a sealed exercise and kept confidential for 50 years. So the claim that Budwig got 7 nominations is patently false. This is not the Oscars where nominees are revealed.

Its obvious that you are a hypochondriac. When one grows old, the search for good health and religion becomes stronger. I have no doubt that I will be in first one thru the church doors and sitting at the first row each Sunday. I am also sure that I will watch my diet and eat supplements. But I would not drag other gullible people on a journey based on falsehood. When someone points out that the claim cannot be substantiated, at least have the decency to do some research.

I am sure those with a mind of their own, will await you as you point out at least one nominee which the Swedish team has officially considered but did not get the prize. You have a century of history to pick one.

So where did you find out that she was a nominee 7 times?

Instead of attacking her credentials

 

[johnny333]

You made some claims over the years and where there are no scientific evidence or research backing them out, I have pointed it out. You are making recommendations which are false and misleads innocent and desperate people. As these claims refer to serious illness you can imagine people will try anything at significant cost. In this case it is minor.

I have categorically stated that Nobel prize nominations are never revealed. The whole thing is a sealed exercise and kept confidential for 50 years. So the claim that Budwig got 7 nominations is patently false. This is not the Oscars where nominees are revealed.

Its obvious that you are a hypochondriac. When one grows old, the search for good health and religion becomes stronger. I have no doubt that I will be in first one thru the church doors and sitting at the first row each Sunday. I am also sure that I will watch my diet and eat supplements. But I would not drag other gullible people on a journey based on falsehood. When someone points out that the claim cannot be substantiated, at least have the decency to do some research.

I am sure those with a mind of their own, will await you as you point out at least one nominee which the Swedish team has officially considered but did not get the prize. You have a century of history to pick one.

So where did you find out that she was a nominee 7 times?

As I've already pointed out the info is on her bio located on http://www.budwigcenter.com/johanna-budwig-biography.php if you don't believe those claims why don't you take it up those who created that site Don't forget to keep us updated on the status ok, otherwise some will think you chicken out

Obviously you don't trust me & in your own words "I've made some claims over the years and where there are no scientific evidence". I've never claimed to be medically qualified & have no special interests i.e. I don't stand to gain financially. However as far as I can remember I've tried to be factually correct.

Alot of the info I've included in my posts about health is available in the public domain & if you think I'm making false claims I dare you to challenge it. This is after all a public forum

 

[Ramseth]

Scroobal, I don't understand why you're getting so worked up over Johnny. He's just forumming, sharing his opinions and views he found from other sources. He doesn't claim anything besides that. For example, it's hard for me to give up meat and seafood, I'd give it a pass, that's all. Others may want to give it a try, nothing wrong too. He and whomsoever he learned from are not recommending poisons or toxins or suspect substances as miracle cures.

 

[scroobal]

Simple question about the 7 nominations? Do beat around the bush.

As I've already pointed out the info is on her bio located on http://www.budwigcenter.com/johanna-budwig-biography.php if you don't believe those claims why don't you take it up those who created that site Don't forget to keep us updated on the status ok, otherwise some will think you chicken out

Obviously you don't trust me & in your own words "I've made some claims over the years and where there are no scientific evidence". I've never claimed to be medically qualified & have no special interests i.e. I don't stand to gain financially. However as far as I can remember I've tried to be factually correct.

Alot of the info I've included in my posts about health is available in the public domain & if you think I'm making false claims I dare you to challenge it. This is after all a public forum

 

[scroobal]

Nothing to get worked about. Part of life expressing my views. Just showing charlatans, idiots and gullible clowns for what they are. Cure for cancer with 95%+ success rate? 7 Nobel Prize nominations? ISD governed by ISA?

Scroobal, I don't understand why you're getting so worked up over Johnny. He's just forumming, sharing his opinions and views he found from other sources. He doesn't claim anything besides that. For example, it's hard for me to give up meat and seafood, I'd give it a pass, that's all. Others may want to give it a try, nothing wrong too. He and whomsoever he learned from are not recommending poisons or toxins or suspect substances as miracle cures.

 

[tonychat]

Scroobal, I don't understand why you're getting so worked up over Johnny. He's just forumming, sharing his opinions and views he found from other sources. He doesn't claim anything besides that. For example, it's hard for me to give up meat and seafood, I'd give it a pass, that's all. Others may want to give it a try, nothing wrong too. He and whomsoever he learned from are not recommending poisons or toxins or suspect substances as miracle cures.

seriously, i tell you, this guy Scrooball, isn't ok. his behavior is not normal at all. He seriously need some therapy sessions. Something must had triggered him in Johnny's article.

 

[Ramseth]

ISD governed by ISA?

You want to bring this up, I'll entertain you. You're right, nothing in ISA mentioned ISD. For the simple fact, ISD was formed only after the conversion of a colonial ordinance into an enactment. However, ISD acts within the powers prescribed by ISA through subsidiary regulations and authorisations from MHA and PMO. You can disband ISD tomorrow but ISA still stands unless repealed in Parliament. The proper minister can just pass the powers to another properly designated department however renamed.

 

[scroobal]

Why get worked up? Only expressing my views. Cool down.

ps. by the way what you wrote is complete rubbish.

You want to bring this up, I'll entertain you. You're right, nothing in ISA mentioned ISD. For the simple fact, ISD was formed only after the conversion of a colonial ordinance into an enactment. However, ISD acts within the powers prescribed by ISA through subsidiary regulations and authorisations from MHA and PMO.

 

[Ramseth]

Why get worked up? Only expressing my views. Cool down.

ps. by the way what you wrote is complete rubbish.

What I wrote said you're right. If that's complete rubbish, I don't mind.

 

[johnny333]

Simple question about the 7 nominations? Do beat around the bush.

This is getting tiresome. I'll cite two sources. Can you do any better


http://www.budwigcenter.com/johanna-budwig-biography.php

I personally visited Dr. Johanna Budwig in her clinic/home in August 2000. Dr. Johanna Budwig was born 30 September 1908, died 19 May 2003. When I saw her in the year 2000 she would have been 91 or 92 years of age. Judging by her stamina and coherent manner I would have predicted that she would have easily reached the 100 years of age mark. Unfortunately she tripped and fell in her own home and never recovered from that accidental fall. I guess that proves the saying once again that "most accidents happen in the home or close to home". It was a tragic loss not just for Germany but for the whole world. She was a genius and it is no wonder that she was a seven-time alternative Nobel Prize nominee. Her legend lives on as people overcome cancer and other serious illnesses uses as bases of their treatment, the famous Budwig Muesli comprised of flaxseed oil and quark (cottage cheese).


http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer/Budwig.html
One afternoon I decided to take the time to start researching Dr Budwig. I wanted to know who she was and learn more about her protocol. I had no idea that two months later, after reading three of her books translated from German to English, and combing the internet, I would still be looking at Dr Budwig’s work. I was trying my best to understand this protocol so I could pass it along to others. I believe I now understand why it appears to work so well. The following is what my research revealed.

Dr Budwig was born in Germany in 1908. She passed away in 2003 at the age of 95. She has been referred to as a top European Cancer Research Scientist, Biochemist, Blood Specialist, German Pharmacologist, and Physicist. Dr Budwig was a seven-time Nobel Prize nominee.

 

[johnny333]

seriously, i tell you, this guy Scrooball, isn't ok. his behavior is not normal at all. He seriously need some therapy sessions. Something must had triggered him in Johnny's article.

I think you might be right. I remember in a previous thread he criticised chelation & he brought up a case of some doctor allegedly over charging some patient. Don't know how the topic of scamming got entangled with chelation

Chelation is a common procedure & if you think you are being overcharged simply shop for another doctor. That's what I did, went to Malaysia for my chelation treatments because it was cheaper than Spore. I also said NO to my Spore cardiologist & went elsewhere

 

[scroobal]

95%+ success rate for cancer and you got two well known village idiots supporting you. Need I say more.

 

[Ramseth]

95%+ success rate for cancer and you got two well known village idiots supporting you. Need I say more.

I feel that you're confusing cure for cancer with preventive measure for cancer. Anyway, as you should well know by now, I drink and smoke and eat every meat edible and disgestible. What the heck!

 

[GoldenDragon]

Then I'd be starved to death before cancer gets me.

No need to siam unhealthy makan. Eat them moderately.

 

[kingrant]

This thread is so interesting. I have come across so many urban legends, scams, and false cures for cancer on the internet as well as thru email chains. They are hard to prove, as there's always an escape clause that you didnt do it correctly etc.

Remember we used to hear about avoiding GM foods, microwave oven foods, baked stuff (acrylamides), stay with a vegan diet, organic produce, drink 100 litres of water daily etc etc.

Here is my prescription for a cancer-free life: eating the right stuff, exrecise, fresh air, stay stress-free, have enough rest...

One cant argue against such prescriptions, but to claim 95% effective rate? There's only a sucker born every minute.

PS. I think Scroobal's pt is that the "7 nominations" thing isnt true. The bugwig buggers were using that to appeal to authority - a frequent trick used in arguments. As soon as that is demolished, all veracity vanishes.

 

[scroobal]

Cottage cheese and flaxseed oil is healthy. So is apple, fresh vegetables and fish. If I say that eat apple a day, and have fresh tables and fish and the cancer cure rate is 50 %. do you think that is honest. What if I told you that I saw it on a website where the chap who found it previously been nominated for a Nobel Prize. You obviously cannot be that stupid. Granted if you are indeed suffering from cancer, you would not bother to check. Your desperation will force you try anything.

I feel that you're confusing cure for cancer with preventive measure for cancer. Anyway, as you should well know by now, I drink and smoke and eat every meat edible and disgestible. What the heck!

 

[scroobal]

There are 3 things that grabbed my attention. First, based on past posting I am aware that he is obsessed with alternative Medicine and prone to hoaxes. Not uncommon with those who are ageing and have had serious condition. Then I saw 95% cancer cure plus the Nobel prize nominations. First post and its straight hit. Then the 2 resident villages idiots turned up. Talking about lining your ducks in a row. I got same problem with 2 clowns within extended family. $3k magnetic mattress "certified" by non existent Japanese Research Lab.

One cant argue against such prescriptions, but to claim 95% effective rate? There's only a sucker born every minute.PS. I think Scroobal's pt is that the "7 nominations" thing isnt true. The bugwig buggers were using that to appeal to authority - a frequent trick used in arguments. As soon as that is demolished, all veracity vanishes.