• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Steve Jobs having health problems?

"Riddled" with spelling inaccuracies ?....good one.

Well. got to be more careful regarding factual errors.

Elevate from gist to research paper status ?
 
You can lay the foundation for good management.
But you cannot install Talent.

Good management is not a substitute for what talent can do.
It is interesting.

Microsoft=Bill gates

w/o Bill,Microsoft stays strong

Apple=Steve Jobs

W/O Steve JOBS-No APPLE,I am also as sure as you
 
It is interesting.

Microsoft=Bill gates

w/o Bill,Microsoft stays strong

Apple=Steve Jobs

W/O Steve JOBS-No APPLE,I am also as sure as you

Don't worry the APPLE won't rot! only fear is they may start selling "oranges" to survive!:p
 
You can lay the foundation for good management.
But you cannot install Talent.

Good management is not a substitute for what talent can do.


I think much of the problem Apple is facing now has been caused by SJ himself. He would take too much credit for the work of others. It gave the impression that SJ was Apple.

Many in the Apple team are the best of the best. Some have been at Apple for years & you don't remain in Apple unless you are very competent.

We are not talking about LKY picking his "best" choices :).
Many in Apple team have actually met or exceeded targets set by SJ. Don't know what a talent is but you have to be pretty good to work with SJ :)
 
I think much of the problem Apple is facing now has been caused by SJ himself. He would take too much credit for the work of others. It gave the impression that SJ was Apple.

There's a big difference between "talent" and "vision".

There are millions of individuals on this earth who are better than Steve Jobs at engineering, design, software development, material science etc but none of them can envision what the consumer wants and then add the "wow" and "cool" factor like Steve Jobs can.

The other half of the original Apple computer team was Steve Wozniak and it was he who was the brains behind the original Apple II. While Jobs was busy selling his vision, Wozniak was the one who was doing the real engineering work.

Wozniak has produced nothing groundbreaking since his departure from Apple. He is still a genius and very talented in his own right. However, without Jobs, he is just one of many.

Apple will lose its dominance once Jobs is no longer there. It will end up like Sony.
 
it's been rumored that he keeps a small group of very talented individuals close to him. maybe that's all he needs
 
it's been rumored that he keeps a small group of very talented individuals close to him. maybe that's all he needs

Tim Cook and Jonathan Ive execute his vision and turn it into glorious reality. However, they still need to be pointed in the right direction.
 
Wozniak has produced nothing groundbreaking since his departure from Apple. He is still a genius and very talented in his own right. However, without Jobs, he is just one of many.

Apple will lose its dominance once Jobs is no longer there. It will end up like Sony.

Steve Wozniak became a teacher while SJ remained a salesman :)

Who is going to take over dominance from Apple, will it be Microsoft, Google:confused: Or what about someone from Taiwan & China?

I don't see any credible threat, yet, to Apple. Not saying there won't be, but the knee jerk reaction to selling their Apple shares is a bit premature.

Tim Cook & Co. may surprise many. He may not be as good as SJ but who is:confused: They must have spent alot of time with SJ & picked up his philosophy.

SJ is still not out of the picture, he may return you know:rolleyes:
 
I'm watching CNBC now & there is alot of coverage on the Steve Jobs story.

Although APPL shares are down US$17+ people like Kramer are pointing out Apple is the best run technology company. All those involved in the discussions are saying they all own numerous Apple products :)

Many analysts opinion is to use this opportunity to buy more APPL shares if the price falls. I'm no fan of the analysts but I think many of these "analysts" have finally caught on to the fact that Apple is a serious player in the market :D
 
Steve Wozniak became a teacher while SJ remained a salesman :)

Who is going to take over dominance from Apple, will it be Microsoft, Google:confused: Or what about someone from Taiwan & China?

I don't see any credible threat, yet, to Apple. Not saying there won't be, but the knee jerk reaction to selling their Apple shares is a bit premature.

Tim Cook & Co. may surprise many. He may not be as good as SJ but who is:confused: They must have spent alot of time with SJ & picked up his philosophy.

SJ is still not out of the picture, he may return you know:rolleyes:

Sam old boy, says it will be Philip Yeo!:D
 
I'm watching CNBC now & there is alot of coverage on the Steve Jobs story.

Although APPL shares are down US$17+ people like Kramer are pointing out Apple is the best run technology company. All those involved in the discussions are saying they all own numerous Apple products :)

Many analysts opinion is to use this opportunity to buy more APPL shares if the price falls. I'm no fan of the analysts but I think many of these "analysts" have finally caught on to the fact that Apple is a serious player in the market :D

I had recommended on behalf of company to a client many eons ago to buy 2 lots of APPL at US$xx...wonder that client had sold those shares...:D
 
The Apple board should hire Philip Yeo. He is very creative and like Jobs, he is a visionary.

I'm sure he could take Apple Inc to new heights.


Sam, they should hire you instead. You are even more brillant than Philip Yeo or even Jobs himself or even better than Bill Gates.



:)
 
I had recommended on behalf of company to a client many eons ago to buy 2 lots of APPL at US$xx...wonder that client had sold those shares...:D


I've actually sold a few hundred shares back when it reached US$80, which back then was a historical high. Who could have predicted that the prices would reach these level :eek:

Many people would have tempted to sell at $100, $150,.... :)
I'm happy that I kept most of my share from all those years.
 
I've actually sold a few hundred shares back when it reached US$80, which back then was a historical high. Who could have predicted that the prices would reach these level :eek:

Many people would have tempted to sell at $100, $150,.... :)
I'm happy that I kept most of my share from all those years.

Was tempted to buy at $xx price, but did not have an US trading account back then, & sad to say, pocket wasn't that deep, was studying Jobs & Appl comeback, that was why recommended the buy...

Some things like, it is not yours to make & it is not yours :(
 
Apple is a company where the CEO almost represent the whole company. They have lots of free cash sitting in reserves. As long as Steve Jobs is alive, your apple shares will be worth money. After he dies, that is a big question mark.


Companies where vision relies on 1 man, it is always very dangerous. Years ago, there was this man named Robert Chandran. His vision made Chemoil, dealing in bio-chemical, oil palms etc. and there were lots of plans and prospects in this company. His departure was sudden, when he and the vice CEO died in a helicopter accident while they were flying over oil palm fields in Indonesia. Ever since, the company never reached the same heights as before and his family sold off his shares to another corporation.

That is the reason why I don't buy Apple shares. The reputation of 1 man supercedes the products they are selling. Just a cancer scare brings the price down, imagine what happens if he dies.
 
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/535822/Why-Steve-Jobs-Is-So-Important-To-Apple
Why Steve Jobs Is So Important to Apple
Posted Jan 18, 2011 11:33am EST by Henry Blodget in Investing, Newsmakers
Related: aapl, ^ixic, qqqq, msft, goog, vz, t

*
Share
*
retweet
* Email
* Print

Apple announced Monday that Steve Jobs is taking another medical leave of absence from the company, his third in the past 7 years.

Apple did not disclose what is wrong with Steve, or what his prognosis is. In Steve's note to Apple staff, however, he sounded more emotional and less certain than he did when announcing his prior leave, and this has obviously left everyone who cares about Steve and the company very concerned.

How will Apple do as a company if Steve is not able to return?

This, obviously, is a critical question, and there's no simple answer. In the short term, six months to a year, the company will likely be fine. After that, however, it's anyone's guess.

Steve Jobs' greatest strength is his product vision, which includes a magical ability to create gadgets that people don't just want and use but love. In the midst of a tectonic collision of the media, technology, and communications industries, Steve's vision has allowed Apple to invent whole new categories of gadgets that had never existed before, including the iPod, iPhone, and iPad. These products, and others, have made Apple the most valuable tech company in the world.

Now that the products have been invented, can someone else steer the Apple ship?

Again, over the short-term, yes, without question. And if Apple's future growth comes primarily from minor updates to existing products, the answer is probably still "yes." Apple is a massive, global company with tens of thousands of talented employees, and they will likely keep making great iPhones and iPads with or without Steve.

But if Apple's future involves whole new categories of products -- as it very well might --Apple without Steve could be much less of a company than it is today.

The collision of TV and computing, for example, is leading dozens of companies to jump into the fray, and this particular battle has not yet been won. Apple's own product in this war -- Apple TV -- is still a work in progress, and it's not clear how the product will evolve.

Apple has many strong executives beneath Steve, and it may be that one of them possesses the same (or similar) product magic that Steve does, but at this point there's no way to know. And Apple's tremendous success over the past decade -- combined with the repeated failure of companies like Microsoft and Nokia -- has illustrated just how how rare Steve's talents are.
 
Was tempted to buy at $xx price, but did not have an US trading account back then, & sad to say, pocket wasn't that deep, was studying Jobs & Appl comeback, that was why recommended the buy...

Some things like, it is not yours to make & it is not yours :(


Yes in those early years before discount brokers like Etrade became accessible to Sporeans, the only way to trade US shares was via brokers. Due to MAS restrictions these brokers had high minimums if you wanted to open a US trading account.

I invested through all of them: local broker offering US trades, US discount broker, unit trusts via Citibank and it was my account with the discount broker that allowed me to make $$$.

I always recommend opening an account with a discount broker. There is no holding charge, no US taxes if you are a foreign investor, & only cost US10 per trade. You even get interest on unused funds.

If you don't have an account, how do you expect to make $$:confused:
 
That is the reason why I don't buy Apple shares. The reputation of 1 man supercedes the products they are selling. Just a cancer scare brings the price down, imagine what happens if he dies.


Do you invest in the US market:confused:
 
Back
Top