Evolution vs Creation - Church To Apologise

when there's no need to, the scenario is more likely like this:

B: i believe.
N: *carries on with his/her own tasks*
B: i BELIEVE.
N: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
B: I BELIEVE!
N: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*

you see the point?


LOL, that is wrong social value because there is an active role of B in this case to influence everyone and so there must be a social responsibility from B, but only N can indirectly check on that responsibility. If everyone behaves like you say, there is no society. :D


But this is acceptable

B: *carries on with his/her own tasks*
N: *carries on with his/her own tasks*
B: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
N: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
B: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
N: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
 
LOL, that is wrong social value because there is an active role of B in this case to influence everyone and so there must be a social responsibility from B, but only N can indirectly check on that responsibility. If everyone behaves like you say, there is no society. :D


But this is acceptable

B: *carries on with his/her own tasks*
N: *carries on with his/her own tasks*
B: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
N: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
B: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*
N: *still carries on with his/her own tasks*

ahaha... that is not a wrong social value. an inaction is more often a times a louder answer than a firm "no", do you only take verbal cues for an answer? :D
 
ahaha... that is not a wrong social value. an inaction is more often a times a louder answer than a firm "no", do you only take verbal cues for an answer? :D

Hey, you may be right after all. :p

So long as B gets the hint. :D
 
Back
Top