Tan Chuan Jin separating from wife, can eat all the mangoes he want outside liao

[Dongyi]

Deleted.

Repeated post.​

 

[Dongyi]

He is believing there is only one hostile green-eye monster samster because every samster should be attracted and full of admiration knowing he is from ACS. When several usernames are actually hostile towards him, it can't be the truth and can't be that many. It must be the same green-eye monster using multiple profiles. One green-eye monster is the highest threshold his delusional ego can accept. Clone mystery solved and verified.

In fact, he is not entirely wrong. The logic is internally consistent: once you accept both the existence of a supposedly universal value system and his authority to define its contents, the rest of the argument falls into place. The values themselves are straightforward: first, that everyone aspires to move from an HDB flat to private property; and second, that everyone wants to own a car. If those premises are accepted, then his conclusions follow naturally.

Within such a framework, there are no exceptions. In other words, the universal value system presumes that all human beings share the same hierarchy of values, regardless of their faith or the depth of their religious commitments. The supposed universality of these aspirations leaves no room for alternative understandings of what gives life meaning and purpose, not even for those whose deepest commitments are shaped by the teachings of Jesus or Buddha, both of whom challenged the notion that material advancement constitutes the highest human aspiration.

The elegance of the system lies in its self-reinforcing character. Whenever it encounters an apparent exception, someone who genuinely does not share these aspirations, it can simply dismiss the dissenter as an instance of "sour grapes." In doing so, dissent is reinterpreted as rationalization, and any challenge to the underlying assumptions is short-circuited. The system thereby preserves, intact and unexamined, the appearance of universality.

@Nut 徒兒, 可以嗎? ​

 

[Nut]

In fact, he is not entirely wrong. The logic is internally consistent: once you accept both the existence of a supposedly universal value system and his authority to define its contents, the rest of the argument falls into place. The values themselves are straightforward: first, that everyone aspires to move from an HDB flat to private property; and second, that everyone wants to own a car. If those premises are accepted, then his conclusions follow naturally.

Within such a framework, there are no exceptions. In other words, the universal value system presumes that all human beings share the same hierarchy of values, regardless of their faith or the depth of their religious commitments. The supposed universality of these aspirations leaves no room for alternative understandings of what gives life meaning and purpose, not even for those whose deepest commitments are shaped by the teachings of Jesus or Buddha, both of whom challenged the notion that material advancement constitutes the highest human aspiration.

The elegance of the system lies in its self-reinforcing character. Whenever it encounters an apparent exception, someone who genuinely does not share these aspirations, it can simply dismiss the dissenter as an instance of "sour grapes." In doing so, dissent is reinterpreted as rationalization, and any challenge to the underlying assumptions is short-circuited. The system thereby preserves, intact and unexamined, the appearance of universality.

@Nut 徒兒, 可以嗎? ​

In short, he is an asshole. 可以

 

[True Believer]

In short, he is an asshole. 可以

In short, you @Nut and your clone @duluxe, are losers and trolls who will meet an early death.

 

[Dongyi]

In short, he is an asshole. 可以

ACS vs ACS, don't quarrel.

 

[True Believer]

ACS vs ACS, don't quarrel.

An ACSian won't troll his brother. Bishop William Oldham would be extremely disappointed.

 

[Dongyi]

@Nut You know Bishop William Oldham ?

 

[Nut]

@Nut You know Bishop William Oldham ?

The father and founder of the school populated by snobs for decades

 

[duluxe]

In short, you @Nut and your clone @duluxe, are losers and trolls who will meet an early death.

Nut is not my clone, i have repeated that many times. I am a (NorthLight + ITE) boy. Nut is a winner, he is (ACS + NUS +....).

 

[duluxe]

In short, he is an asshole. 可以

The pervert has dropped rocket from his clone list. That means he is about 35% not accurate or right.

 

[Hmv]

Why ACS boy Chuan Jin commit adultery?

TCJ is ACS? I thought RI?

 

[Nut]

TCJ is ACS? I thought RI?

ACS then RJC.

 

[Nut]

The pervert has dropped rocket from his clone list. That means he is about 35% not accurate or right.

last time that siaolang also say @Dongyi is a clone together with @rocket, me and you.

 

[True Believer]

last time that siaolang also say @Dongyi is a clone together with @rocket, me and you.

You never get tired of talking to yourself; it is a severe mental condition.

 

[duluxe]

last time that siaolang also say @Dongyi is a clone together with @rocket, me and you.

His clone rule is rather is simple, any strong critics must be a clone. Superpower was also a clone, lol! His delusion and accuracy are improving, his latest list only 2.

 

[Dongyi]

His clone rule is rather is simple, any strong critics must be a clone. Superpower was also a clone, lol! His delusion and accuracy are improving, his latest list only 2.

You're barking up the wrong tree. The real issue is the criteria for "uncloning." Examining those criteria will show why certain avatars are considered clones.

 

[Nut]

ou're barking up the wrong tree. The real issue is the criteria for "uncloning." Examining those criteria will show why certain avatars are considered clones.

You mean siaolang got siaolang logic?

 

[Dongyi]

You mean siaolang got siaolang logic?

I mean the logic lies in the criteria for uncloning, not cloning.

 

[Nut]

I mean the logic lies in the criteria for uncloning, not cloning.

So, it means only if agree with that snob, then he will unclone, otherwise perpetually in his delusional clone list?

 

[Dongyi]

So, it means only if agree with that snob, then he will unclone, otherwise perpetually in his delusional clone list?

Not exactly. You see, I didn't agree with everything he said.