China can not only claim taiwan and SCS, but korea and japan too based on dna.

[syed putra]

So why takaichi hate china so much? She is from yellow river ancestry.

 

[eatshitndie]

lice caused an asiatic boom and then angmoh makan such as atas pasta, flied chicken, hamburger and flies caused an asiatic bust - aka demographic decline in sk, jp, tw, cn, hk, sg.

 

[laksaboy]

Tiongs should worry about their own backyard instead of stirring shit in other countries or have delulu fantasies about lording over all yellowskins.

Your shitty little middle kingdom since 1949 might not be intact forever.

 

[k1976]

So why takaichi hate china so much? She is from yellow river ancestry.

Maybe Malay are original owner of Nippon island?

 

[syed putra]

Malay?

Malays are free polynesian blood mixed with people from the trade routes snd orang asli.

 

[A Singaporean]

There is no way coolie gene retards can trace their ancestry roots to be similar to that of superior Koreans and Jepunese.
No more more disgusting people than Sinkies with extremely inferior genes.

 

[Hightech88]

Malays are free polynesian blood mixed with people from the trade routes snd orang asli.

Austronesian lah, what Polynesian, cheo see lang..LOL:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austronesian_peoples

 

[Hightech88]

So why takaichi hate china so much? She is from yellow river ancestry.

**No, the video is misleading and oversimplifies the science.**

The video ("Ancient DNA Proves the Koreans and Japanese Are Not Who We Thought") pushes a dramatic narrative that Koreans and Japanese are "mostly from China" and that their ancient hunter-gatherer roots were largely replaced. While it uses some real ancient DNA studies, it exaggerates the "replacement" and ignores important nuances.

### Accurate Picture from Ancient DNA Studies (2021–2026)

**For Koreans:**
- Modern Koreans are a mixture.
- Roughly **70–90%** of their ancestry comes from **ancient East Asian farming populations** (related to people from the Yellow River and Yangtze River regions in China).
- The remaining **10–30%** comes from earlier **hunter-gatherer** groups who lived on the Korean peninsula for tens of thousands of years.
- Korea was **never** "part of China" in the way the video implies. Ancient Korea had its own distinct cultures and kingdoms (Gojoseon, Buyeo, Goguryeo, etc.). There was cultural and genetic influence from China, but Koreans are genetically closest to each other and to Japanese, not identical to Han Chinese.

**For Japanese:**
This is where the video is most misleading.

Modern Japanese have **three main ancestral components** (the current scientific consensus):

1. **Jōmon** (ancient hunter-gatherers): ~10–20% (higher in Ainu and Ryukyuans/Okinawans).
2. **Yayoi** (rice farmers who arrived ~3,000–2,300 years ago): Major contribution.
3. **Kofun / East Asian** (later arrivals): Significant component.

The Yayoi farmers who brought rice agriculture to Japan came **primarily from the Korean Peninsula**, not directly from China in one big wave. Genetic studies (including 2024–2025 papers) show that the Yayoi people were genetically closest to **ancient Koreans**, who themselves had mixed ancestry from Northeast Asia and earlier Chinese farming groups.

In short:
- Japanese ancestry is **not** "mostly from China."
- It is a **tripartite mix**: Jōmon (local) + Yayoi (mainly from Korea) + later East Asian input.
- Koreans and Japanese are **closely related** to each other, more so than either is to Han Chinese.

### Bottom Line
- The video exaggerates the "Chinese origin" story for dramatic effect.
- Koreans and Japanese both have significant ancestry linked to ancient Northeast Asian farming populations, but their histories involve **local hunter-gatherers + migrants from the Korean Peninsula + cultural influence from China**, not a simple "they came from China."
- The idea that "Korea once belonged to China" is also historically inaccurate in the way it's presented — there were periods of Chinese influence and conquest attempts, but Korea maintained distinct kingdoms and identity.

Ancient DNA has indeed rewritten parts of East Asian history, but the real story is more complex and nuanced than the video claims.
------------ Source: Grok AI

 

[syed putra]

Austronesian lah, what Polynesian, cheo see lang..LOL:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austronesian_peoples
View attachment 240879

A thousand apologies

 

[syed putra]

Ancient DNA has indeed rewritten parts of East Asian history, but the real story is more complex and nuanced than the video claims.
------------ Source: Grok AI

Grok are known to be easily manipulated to strengthen the influence of deep state.