One says the mRNA vax poses More Risks than benefits The other one says taking mRNA vax, the benefits outweigh the risk Which one do you trust?

[Tragedeigh]

​

One says the mRNA vaccines poses More Risks than benefits The other one says taking mRNA vaccines, the benefits outweigh the risk Which one do you trust more?​

Interesting

The Controversy Over mRNA Vaccine Funding

In a major shift in U.S. health policy, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under the influence of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., moved to cancel nearly $500 million in federal contracts for the development of mRNA-based vaccines. This decision has sparked a fierce global debate between public health advocates and those skeptical of the technology's long-term safety.

The Rationale for the Cancellation

The official stance from the current administration is that the risks of mRNA technology—specifically concerns regarding rare side effects like myocarditis (heart inflammation) and the perceived lack of long-term data—outweigh its benefits. RFK Jr. and his supporters argue that mRNA vaccines have not been effective enough at preventing transmission of respiratory viruses like COVID-19 and that the government should pivot toward "traditional" vaccine platforms with longer safety records.

The Scientific Backlash

The scientific community has reacted with alarm. Most experts point out that mRNA technology was the key to saving an estimated 20 million lives during the first year of the pandemic alone. Unlike traditional vaccines, which take months or years to develop, mRNA "plug-and-play" technology allows scientists to update vaccines in weeks to counter new variants. Furthermore, the technology is currently the most promising avenue for creating personalized cancer vaccines, which train the immune system to attack tumors.

Global Ramifications

By defunding this research, critics argue the U.S. is "handing over the keys" to the future of medicine to other nations like China and Germany. Beyond COVID, mRNA research was being funneled into fighting RSV, the flu, and even HIV. As this policy unfolds, the world is watching to see if this move will protect the public from "risks" or leave the nation vulnerable to the next great biological threat.

 

[Tragedeigh]

@Sustanon
Your views needed.

 

[Sustanon]

@Sustanon
Your views needed.

Trust yourself. It will eventually lead you to the promised land of SBPSBHJ 的 CBs.....

 

[Tragedeigh]

Trust yourself

I believe so too.
Fuck PAP

 

[metalrover]

Can be either way lah, but forcing ppl to may may pah is wrong

 

[laksaboy]

Ong Ye Kung is our Sinkie version of Dr Fauci. Their kind needs to be hanged.

 

[Sustanon]

Ong Ye Kung is our Sinkie version of Dr Fauci. Their kind needs to be hanged.

Public hanging and leave the corpse to rot will be a sight to behold for low life like these....

 

[Dongyi]

I adopted a wait-and-see approach. I was told that if two-thirds of the population were vaccinated, it would create a protective barrier against the spread of the disease. I simply chose to be part of the remaining one-third. I monitored the vaccination rate every day in relation to the death rate, and when it finally reached 70%, more vaccinated people were dying. From that point on, I concluded that it would not work, and I decided not to get vaccinated.

When the government began rolling out the vaccines, media coverage consistently emphasized that unvaccinated individuals faced a higher risk. Reports frequently presented the number of deaths among the unvaccinated alongside those among the vaccinated, framing the comparison in a way that suggested the vaccines were effectively protecting the population.

Although I do not claim to have @sbfuncle’s mathematical expertise or the scientific genius of @Truthspeak , it seemed clear to me that, at the outset, the higher number of deaths among the unvaccinated did not necessarily reflect the vaccine’s efficacy, since the unvaccinated population was significantly larger than the vaccinated one at the time. Later, when the vaccination rate reached 80%, the distribution of deaths appeared to shift toward the vaccinated group. From that point onward, vaccination appeared to shift from being framed primarily as a matter of personal protection against the virus to becoming, in part, a means of aligning with the majority and complying with requirements for access to public spaces such as malls and restaurants. The push against the unvaccinated felt non-stop, like it was everywhere you looked. At some point, getting vaccinated didn’t seem like just a health choice anymore. It almost felt like a social badge, or even a bit of a trend, kind of like wearing the latest Apple Watch.​

 

[Sustanon]

I adopted a wait-and-see approach. I was told that if two-thirds of the population were vaccinated, it would create a protective barrier against the spread of the disease. I simply chose to be part of the remaining one-third. I monitored the vaccination rate every day in relation to the death rate, and when it finally reached 70%, more vaccinated people were dying. From that point on, I concluded that it would not work, and I decided not to get vaccinated.

When the government began rolling out the vaccines, media coverage consistently emphasized that unvaccinated individuals faced a higher risk. Reports frequently presented the number of deaths among the unvaccinated alongside those among the vaccinated, framing the comparison in a way that suggested the vaccines were effectively protecting the population.

Although I do not claim to have @sbfuncle’s mathematical expertise or the scientific genius of @Truthspeak , it seemed clear to me that, at the outset, the higher number of deaths among the unvaccinated did not necessarily reflect the vaccine’s efficacy, since the unvaccinated population was significantly larger than the vaccinated one at the time. Later, when the vaccination rate reached 80%, the distribution of deaths appeared to shift toward the vaccinated group. From that point onward, vaccination appeared to shift from being framed primarily as a matter of personal protection against the virus to becoming, in part, a means of aligning with the majority and complying with requirements for access to public spaces such as malls and restaurants. The push against the unvaccinated felt non-stop, like it was everywhere you looked. At some point, getting vaccinated didn’t seem like just a health choice anymore. It almost felt like a social badge, or even a bit of a trend, kind of like wearing the latest Apple Watch.​

I told those idiots Pak Ji Ki Lan Ok Ji Ki Lan. Limpei ish will not comply one.

 

[Boonsiong]

Good

 

[Reaper]

Whoops.

 

[Sustanon]

View attachment 236747Whoops.

think Roland Tay should be quite used to seeing this kind of stuff on the rise after those PCB Garbage Zhams...