Goh Jin Hian criminal offence pre trial conference 19 will be held in 28 nov 2025

[Boonsiong]

Any bookies opening odds?

Acquitted odds is horse odds x70

Convicted with home detention x3.40

Convicted with short jail sentence x2.50

Convicted with long jail sentence x2. 35


Based on his papa and mama hints, I put my $ on acquitted

Nobody will trust Singapore Exchanges

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Any bookies opening odds?

Acquitted odds is horse odds x70

Convicted with home detention x3.40

Convicted with short jail sentence x2.50

Convicted with long jail sentence x2. 35


Based on his papa and mama hints, I put my $ on acquitted

Fine like OBS

 

[sbfuncle]

Fine like OBS

Fine like obs odds x2.50

Place your bets now.

 

[Boonsiong]

Fine like OBS

Like that means Singapore exchanges allow insider trading and manipulation?

 

[Boonsiong]

SC-905855-2023 PP v. Goh Jin Hian

SC-905855-2023

SC: Singapore court
Opened the file and charged Goh Jin Hian in year 2023

However, now is end of 2025, there is almost minimal progress even after 19 pre trial conferences

 

[Boonsiong]

 

[batman1]

SC-905855-2023 PP v. Goh Jin Hian

SC-905855-2023

SC: Singapore court
Opened the file and charged Goh Jin Hian in year 2023

However, now is end of 2025, there is almost minimal progress even after 19 pre trial conferences

The CJ did not stop the attempt to pervert the course of justice.

 

[iluvgst]

Perpetual PTCs

 

[shiokalingam]

this John Soh case more longer ,

“It is necessary and of utmost importance for the substantial global sentences to be imposed on (Soh and Quah) respectively to capture the gravity of their wrongdoing.”

The two were

convicted of a record 349 successful charges

in total following nearly 200 days of trial over nearly four years.

 

[Boonsiong]

GSB is good at writing letters to straits times.
Maybe madam Gan can write letter to straits times in behalf of Sam bros

 

[Boonsiong]

this John Soh case more longer ,

View attachment 233001

“It is necessary and of utmost importance for the substantial global sentences to be imposed on (Soh and Quah) respectively to capture the gravity of their wrongdoing.”

The two were

convicted of a record 349 successful charges

in total following nearly 200 days of trial over nearly four years.

John Soh was jailed before he was convicted

 

[Boonsiong]

John Soh was jailed before he was convicted

Yes, John Soh (full name Soh Chee Wen) was held in remand—effectively jailed—prior to his conviction by the Singapore High Court. He was remanded starting in November 2016 after being charged on November 25, 2016, for market manipulation and related offenses tied to the 2013 S$8 billion penny stock crash. His trial lasted nearly 200 days, leading to conviction on 180 charges on May 5, 2022, followed by a 36-year sentence on December 28, 2022 (with a stay pending appeal). In contrast, his co-accused Quah Su-Ling remained on S$4 million bail during this period. This pre-trial detention is standard in Singapore for serious cases where flight risk or evidence tampering is a concern, as seen in reports from the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Singapore Police Force, and outlets like TODAY and The Straits Times.

 

[shiokalingam]

John Soh was jailed before he was convicted

thanks for the info.

Hear say he does the following , witness tempering :


the reason John Soh Chee Wen was jailed before his conviction in the S$8 billion penny stock crash case, while his accomplice Quah Su-Ling was out on bail for a significant period, relates to a key difference in their circumstances after being charged:

• John Soh was remanded (held in custody without bail) from November 2016 onwards, soon after he was charged.

• Quah Su-Ling was granted bail (S$4 million) and was out of custody during the trial, and even after their initial conviction, pending her appeal. She was only denied extension of bail by the Court of Appeal after they dismissed her appeal against conviction in late 2025.

Key Factors for Soh's Remand vs. Quah's Bail​

While the specific judicial reasoning for the initial bail decisions isn't fully detailed in the snippets, the critical difference that likely led to John Soh's remand was the additional charges of witness tampering he faced.

• John Soh: He was convicted of an additional eight charges of witness tampering for asking four witnesses to lie to investigators after the stock market crash. Charges like witness tampering suggest an attempt to obstruct justice, which is a significant factor against granting bail as it indicates a risk of further interference with the legal process. This likely contributed to the court's decision to keep him in remand (jail) for the duration of the long trial.

• Quah Su-Ling: Although convicted of market manipulation and cheating offences, she did not face the witness tampering charges. She was initially granted S$4 million bail and was out during the trial proceedings.

In Singapore's legal system, a court can deny bail if it believes the accused is a flight risk, will tamper with witnesses, or commit further offences. For John Soh, the witness tampering evidence would have strongly supported the decision to deny him bail and keep him in custody to ensure the integrity of the judicial process.

 

[sbfuncle]

Yes, John Soh (full name Soh Chee Wen) was held in remand—effectively jailed—prior to his conviction by the Singapore High Court. He was remanded starting in November 2016 after being charged on November 25, 2016, for market manipulation and related offenses tied to the 2013 S$8 billion penny stock crash. His trial lasted nearly 200 days, leading to conviction on 180 charges on May 5, 2022, followed by a 36-year sentence on December 28, 2022 (with a stay pending appeal). In contrast, his co-accused Quah Su-Ling remained on S$4 million bail during this period. This pre-trial detention is standard in Singapore for serious cases where flight risk or evidence tampering is a concern, as seen in reports from the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Singapore Police Force, and outlets like TODAY and The Straits Times.

Where is quah su ling now?

 

[Boonsiong]

Where is quah su ling now?

No, Quah Su-Ling (likely the person you meant, as “Quah Suh Ling” appears to be a misspelling based on public records) is not in jail as of November 27, 2025. She was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment in December 2022 for her role in the 2013 Singapore penny stock market manipulation scandal, which wiped out S$8 billion in market value. However, she has remained out on S$4 million bail since 2017, extended pending appeals. Her appeal was rejected by the Court of Appeal on October 10, 2025, upholding the conviction and sentence. No reports confirm her surrender or incarceration by late November 2025, so she is likely still free while final arrangements are made. For context, her co-accused John Soh has been in remand since 2016 and is serving his 36-year sentence.

 

[sbfuncle]

No, Quah Su-Ling (likely the person you meant, as “Quah Suh Ling” appears to be a misspelling based on public records) is not in jail as of November 27, 2025. She was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment in December 2022 for her role in the 2013 Singapore penny stock market manipulation scandal, which wiped out S$8 billion in market value. However, she has remained out on S$4 million bail since 2017, extended pending appeals. Her appeal was rejected by the Court of Appeal on October 10, 2025, upholding the conviction and sentence. No reports confirm her surrender or incarceration by late November 2025, so she is likely still free while final arrangements are made. For context, her co-accused John Soh has been in remand since 2016 and is serving his 36-year sentence.

Confusing. How can a person been sentenced to 20 years be out on bail for so long?
Since no leeport now, probably she had already abscounded.

 

[Hightech88]

This PCB ownself-check-ownself farker stilll got mood to showoff relaxing at Botanic Gardens LOL.

 

[Boonsiong]

Confusing. How can a person been sentenced to 20 years be out on bail for so long?
Since no leeport now, probably she had already abscounded.

You need to understand the difference between bailable offence and non billable offence

 

[sbfuncle]

You need to understand the difference between bailable offence and non billable offence

Sentence of 20 years means a major crime.
A major crime can be bailable is acceptable but for such a long time becum non acceptable. As the person conlanfirm will run road de woh.
Who want to be lockup for the rest of their life? Even you get caught while running, you will not lose anything.
But if you succeed, you are a free person.

 

[sbfuncle]

This PCB ownself-check-ownself farker stilll got mood to showoff relaxing at Botanic Gardens LOL.

This either means

1. He is confident of the case

2. He had already disown his son