[Sg] - OYK says KF Seetoh is talking nonsense

The bigger question should me...what is the Definition of Social Enterprise and what is the obligation of Management? Bcos for social enterprises..Management have a cap on 'surpluses'
As usual, the govt dont have the answer, taichi out to cronies to get it done and turn a blind eye to the sheenanigans and have the dare to stand up and say they have done everything for the people.

you can see now OYK quietly run and hide and don't dare show face or say anything liao.
 
Timbre Group responds to KF Seetoh's claims of unfair clauses & double standards in Yishun Park Hawker Centre
Hawkers.

author profile
August 27, 2025, 10:00 AM
imageTelegramWhatsapp
Timbre Group clarified some points regarding their management of Yishun Park Hawker Centre on August 26, after food critic and Makansutra founder KF Seetoh took to Facebook on August 23 to criticise the company's management of the area.

Seetoh claims unfair clauses and double standards
In his post, Seetoh claimed that Timbre Group, which manages Yishun Park Hawker Centre, takes 15 per cent of total sales from successful hawkers.

"Hawker Centres serve the community and provides entry level business opportunities for hawkers. The govt built it, paid Timbre to manage it, they collect rent and conveniently take 15% from the successful hawkers. Not right." Seetoh wrote.

The food critic also claimed there was a double standard in terms of contracts between SEHCs and NEA's own-managed Centres, with the latter having fewer rules and regulations hawker owners had to abide by.

On the contrary, Seetoh said Timbre Group has a 25-page contract for hawkers.

In a screenshot attached to the post, there were 18 charges hawkers had to abide by, where non-compliance would result in a S$100 fine per incident.

These fines included refusing to accept tuckshop loyalty apps as a mode of payment for purchases, producing music or noise from vocal appliances, and failing to provide customers with trays.


Photo via KF Seetoh/Facebook
Seetoh also raised Timbre Group's "forced loyalty app discount by the hawkers", asking why it was "their responsibility to feed the poor?"

The food critic also claimed that surveillance cameras with microphones were installed in every stall to monitor sales and "ensure no one cheats", and that Timbre Group refused to use a cheaper gas provider despite hawkers' suggestions to do so.

Timbre Group's response
Timbre Group said the hawker centre operates under a gross turnover rental model where the rental payable varies according to the hawker's earnings.

The company said this better balances the risks and rewards between the operator and the hawker.

"When earnings are low, a hawker pays lower rent. When earnings are good, the rent payable is higher," they said, adding that there is a maximum rent payable at S$2,550 per month.

"The rent goes towards the operating revenue of the centre, and 50 per cent of the operating surplus of the centre is ploughed back towards the betterment of the centre and stallholders, and support such as regular weekend and festive programming for the community, marketing campaigns to drive footfall," Timbre Group said.

The company clarified that the CCTV cameras were installed in August 2024 following repeated feedback from residents on noise late at night.

"While we had reminded all hawkers to minimise noise during these hours, the feedback had continued," they said.

Timbre Group said:

"The CCTVs enable us to identify the potential sources of noise, so that we can better address residents’ feedback. Additionally, the CCTVs are useful for safety and security, resolving the occasional customer dispute, and verifying situations where a few hawkers were observed not to conduct their transactions using the point-of-sales which made it much harder to accurately determine the rent payable."

Regarding contract details for hawkers, the company said they have clauses in their tenancy agreements "to provide a clean and conducive environment for all hawkers to operate in as well as to ensure compliance with other areas, such as the personal operations of the stall and the proper hiring of additional manpower."

"Non-compliance charges have been part of our tenancy agreements since inception to ensure fairness to all stallholders," Timbre Group remarked, and noted the charges are applied as "a last resort to deter repeated non-compliances, after multiple verbal reminders and written notices are provided".

"Thus far, our regular patrons at YPHC have acknowledged the consistently clean and comfortable dining environment they continue to enjoy."

The company also said that Yishun Park Hawker Centre's gas supply is provided centrally and secured through competitive procurement.

"Nevertheless, to ease the overall burden of rising costs, Timbre had extended some discounts to all hawkers earlier this year," they said.

Timbre Group also clarified that the 10 per cent loyalty discount for payments made by diners via the Timbre app has been in place since 2017, which encourages repeat customers to the hawker centre.

The company noted the cost of the app was fully borne by Timbre.

"It is important to set out the facts accurately. Timbre Group acknowledges the challenges faced by the hawker community and remains committed to supporting hawkers, addressing community concerns, and fostering open dialogue based on facts," Timbre Group stated.

Other articles
Top image via Mothership and Seetoh's Facebook

ADVERTISEMENT
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.

image
image
image
image
ADVERTISEMENT
MORE STORIES

image
News August 27, 2025, 10:00 AM
 
Seetoh rebuts Timbre’s defence, cites high costs and lack of reform despite 2024 Parliament motion debate
On 27 Aug, KF Seetoh rebutted Timbre Group’s defence of its Yishun Park Hawker Centre model. He cited high gas prices, CCTV surveillance, and penalty clauses, while expressing frustration that despite a 2024 parliamentary motion to review hawker centre management policies, reforms have stalled and conditions remain unchanged.


Published

on

27 August 2025
Veteran food critic and hawker culture advocate KF Seetoh has issued a strong rebuttal to Timbre Group’s recent defence of its management of Yishun Park Hawker Centre, a Socially-conscious Enterprise Hawker Centre (SEHC).

In a Facebook post on 27 August, Seetoh reiterated concerns about high gas prices, the use of surveillance cameras, and penalty clauses.

He voiced disappointment that despite a full parliamentary debate in November 2024 and calls to phase out the SEHC model, no concrete reforms had been implemented.

Timbre Group’s earlier defence
On 26 August, Timbre Group responded to Seetoh’s initial 23 August post, where he described the SEHC rental and management framework as “exploitative” and in need of a major overhaul.

Seetoh had shared contract documents showing that hawkers at Yishun Park were required to pay rent pegged to 15 per cent of gross turnover, capped at S$2,550, or subject to a minimum of S$1,750, in addition to S$900 service charges and other administrative fees.


He argued this penalised successful hawkers while burdening all stallholders with fixed costs and additional mandatory charges, such as using designated gas suppliers and Timbre’s point-of-sale system.

In its statement, Timbre defended the gross turnover rental model as one that “better shares risks and rewards” between operator and hawkers, adding that half of any surplus revenue is reinvested into community programming and stallholder support.

The operator also clarified that CCTV cameras were installed in August 2024 following repeated noise complaints from residents and to ensure compliance with the point-of-sale system.

It maintained that penalties were imposed only as a last resort after warnings.

Seetoh invokes parliamentary debate on hawker culture
In his latest response, Seetoh recalled that Parliament had passed a motion in November 2024 supporting stronger governance of hawker culture.

The debate, initiated by then Non-Constituency MP Leong Mun Wai and later amended by PAP MP Edward Chia, concluded with unanimous support.

The amended motion read:

“That this House calls on the government to continue its support for hawkers by regularly reviewing its policies relating to hawkers and the management of hawker centres, which will help to sustain and grow Singapore’s hawker culture so that Singaporeans can continue to enjoy good and affordable hawker food while enabling hawkers to earn a fair livelihood.”

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle had emphasised the need to preserve and sustain hawker culture, with one approved point calling for the abolition of the SEHC model and the creation of a new rental framework more supportive of hawkers.

“Many MPs spoke so warmly about their affinity with our hawker culture,” Seetoh wrote.

“But I didn’t see any movement. No action, and it’s still status quo. It really left a sour note and my curiosity as to how Parliament works.”

Criticism of commercial food court practices
Seetoh argued that while Timbre’s approach might be defensible if it were managing a privately built food court, the same model was inappropriate for a publicly funded hawker centre.

“Everything Timbre does at Yishun Park Hawker Centre is correct if it’s a commercial food court constructed with their own investments,” he said.

“But this is a public hawker centre built by government and paid Timbre to manage by providing ‘fair livelihood’ for hawkers. The Timbre contract does not look so on many fronts.”

Gas prices 50 per cent higher than NEA centres
Seetoh renewed his criticism of utility costs, claiming that hawkers at Yishun Park were paying 50 per cent more for gas compared with their counterparts in NEA-managed hawker centres.

A receipt shared by Seetoh shows hawkers at the park allegedly pay S$14 per gas unit, while in NEA-run hawker centres charge S$5 less.


He added that a petition by stallholders protesting the high rates only led to a token S$1 discount.


Dispute over CCTV in stalls
Timbre has said cameras were necessary to monitor point-of-sale compliance and to address late-night noise complaints from nearby residents.

Seetoh rejected this reasoning, arguing that hawkers typically did not create noise while cooking and that NEA had never found it necessary to install cameras inside stalls at centres located next to housing blocks.

“No hawker shouts incessantly when in the stall at work,” Seetoh wrote.

“That’s no excuse to surveil them with CCTVs inside the stalls.”


Questioning the “socially conscious” mandate
Seetoh further challenged whether Timbre and other SEHC operators were living up to their stated mission of being socially conscious.

“Timbre and all SEHC management should assess if their operation is indeed socially conscious based on government and community guidelines,” he wrote.

“If you only know the commercial food court model, you should decline managing it.”

He drew on his own international experience with food halls, including ventures in New York, Manila, and Singapore, as well as consultancy work for Food Republic and Rasa Pura at Marina Bay Sands.

According to Seetoh, the commercial food court framework should not be applied to community hawker centres that were intended to sustain livelihoods and cultural heritage.

“Go rethink, or rescind”
Seetoh ended his post by urging operators to reconsider their involvement in managing public hawker centres under the SEHC model.

“Go rethink, or rescind, please,” he said. “We don’t need you to clarify what you did, but why.”

Share this:
 
Founder of Timbre Group is a PAP MP.

Gemini says:
Edward Chia Bing Hui is a co-founder of Timbre Group and a Member of Parliament for the People's Action Party (PAP) in Singapore, not the other way around. He founded Timbre Group with a social mission to support Singaporean musicians and culinary talents and now seeks to represent Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Parliament.
 
the delays in govt action is obviously just winding down the cost of the construction while earning whatever revenue they can from the arrangement with Timbre and others. The will take action after 20 years (usually minimum). You can see most of the time govt built structures are only demolished earliest after 20 year.
 
Median rents for privately owned HDB shops soar to all-time high of S$7.34 psf
Updated: September 3, 2025
·
5 min read
·
private owned hdb shops rent
Rents for heartland shops are soaring, with privately owned HDB shops hitting record highs. For small businesses, this means rising costs and tougher choices, while HDB-managed units continue to provide some level of stability.

Rising rental rates for privately held HDB shops
Over the past year, HDB shop rentals under private landlords have more than doubled. Median rates moved up from S$3.51 psf in Q2 2024 to S$7.34 psf in Q2 2025, marking the highest level on record since data tracking began in 1999. This sharp increase has left many business owners struggling to cope with rising costs.

By contrast, HDB-owned shop units have remained far more stable. Data shows that rents for nine out of ten of these shops have hardly changed in the last five years, providing some relief for businesses fortunate enough to lease directly from the board.

Context and supply of HDB shop units
To understand this better, you need to look at the breakdown of supply. Around 8,500 HDB shop units are privately owned, while about 7,000 are directly leased out by HDB. The government stopped selling shop units to private buyers back in 1998, so all newer shop spaces have remained under HDB’s management.

According to The Straits Times, HDB has explained that this approach allows it to better manage the trade mix and ensure shops meet the needs of residents in different towns. Privately owned HDB shops are also subject to lease terms. While it was previously stated that most of these units were sold on 30-year leases, HDB has since clarified that only about 5% of shops carry 30-year leases, while a larger share of 51% were sold with 99-year leases. Many of the 30-year leasehold shops are due to expire around 2028, which could further reduce the pool of privately held units in the years ahead.

Differences between private landlords vs. HDB
When you compare the two options, the differences are quite clear.

If you rent from private landlords, you will usually face more volatile rental swings. Prices can jump quickly, especially in older estates or in central locations where footfall is high. Yet, these shops give you more freedom in terms of business type, since private owners have fewer restrictions on allowable trades.

On the other hand, HDB-owned shop units are known for their stability. Rental increases tend to be moderate, often rising just 5–10% over a decade. HDB also reports its numbers in averages, while URA Realis reports median figures for private shops. The main drawback, however, is availability. Demand is strong, and many public tenders attract dozens of bidders. As a result, some businesses are priced out by high offers even if they prefer the steadiness of HDB leasing.

What’s behind the sharp rental increases?
So why are privately owned HDB shops rent climbing so quickly? Analysts have pointed to stronger post-pandemic consumer demand. With foot traffic bouncing back in older estates, many businesses are willing to pay a premium for such spots.

Privately held shops are also more flexible when it comes to permitted trades, unlike HDB-owned units where each tenancy agreement locks the unit into specific uses. This added freedom has drawn more interest from businesses looking to tap into new opportunities.

How is this impacting small businesses?
For many small retailers, these rental hikes are becoming hard to manage. Some have had no choice but to sublet part of their shop space just to make rent more affordable. Others have downsized to smaller shops, giving up space in exchange for lower rental obligations.

In places like Toa Payoh, business owners have reported at least five shop closures or downsizing moves in just the past year. Some stores that once operated comfortably have now relocated, while others have shut their doors for good because rents were no longer sustainable.

Even for those still holding on, margins are thin. When rents rise by 20% to 30% in a single renewal, many business owners are forced to rethink how much space they truly need.

Are there any signs of the HDB market cooling in the near future?
Although rental growth has been intense, there are early signs that the market may be easing. Analysts have observed that the pace of increases has started to slow in 2025. Business sentiment is softer, largely because costs for manpower, utilities, and supplies have gone up.

This has shifted dynamics in the market. While 2024 was very much a landlord’s market, the situation in 2025 is moving towards a tenant’s market. With fewer new businesses rushing to take up space, landlords are becoming more open to negotiations. Some are willing to accept offers below their initial asking prices, something that was far less common a year ago.
 
Concerns rise over record-breaking HDB coffee shop rents and impact on F&B operators
Coffee shop rents in Singapore have surged to record highs, sparking concerns over food affordability and the survival of small F&B operators. In his TikTok post, former F&B owner Khoo Keat Hwee warns that unsustainable rental norms, driven by large investors and REITs, risk displacing local businesses and raising everyday living costs for residents.


Published

on

3 September 2025
Coffee shop rents in Singapore have reached unprecedented levels, raising questions about affordability for residents and sustainability for food and beverage (F&B) operators.

Khoo Keat Hwee, 38, founder of Mentai-Ya Japanese Cuisine and an F&B consultant, highlighted the issue in a recent series of social media posts.

He pointed to record-breaking tenders in Housing and Development Board (HDB) estates, calling the trend “unsustainable”.

Record-breaking tenders for HDB coffee shop
In February 2024, Chang Cheng Mee Wah secured the tender for Block 633 Tampines North Drive 2 with a monthly rent of S$88,889.


A coffee shop at Block 431A Northshore Drive in Punggol was tendered in May 2024 for S$62,888 per month, while another outlet in Bidadari reached S$73,888 in March 2025.


Khoo questioned whether these figures could become “new rental norms”, pushing food prices even higher in estates such as Tampines North, Punggol, and Bidadari.

He contrasted the current landscape with less than a decade ago, when monthly coffee shop rents typically ranged between S$30,000 and S$40,000.

By his calculation, a S$80,000 rent could translate into S$8,000 per stall, or S$61 per square foot each month before goods and services tax.

An online listing in a F&B rental Facebook group in July advertised a stall takeover opportunity at Chang Cheng Mee Wah’s coffee shop at 633 Tampines North Drive 2.

The rental was S$6,000 per month for the first year and S$6,500 for the second and third years, excluding maintenance, POS, dish collection, and pest control fees.


“To survive, a stall needs daily sales of at least S$1,000, equivalent to selling 200 plates of S$5 chicken rice every day just to break even,” Khoo noted.

He cited the closure of OK Chicken Rice’s outlet at Block 660A Edgedale Plains in Punggol as an example, despite the stall generating about S$30,000 in monthly sales.

Khoo criticised larger companies for treating coffee shops as long-term investment assets, which he said encouraged higher bids and rapid stall turnover.

“Low footfall, high rents, tenants come, tenants go,” he remarked.

Investment-driven rental escalation and REITs’ role
His concerns extended beyond HDB coffee shops.

In a separate commentary on TikTok, Khoo pointed to shopping malls such as Paya Lebar Quarter (PLQ), where he observed frequent tenant changes, including multiple food stalls shutting down.

He argued that real estate investment trusts (REITs) were prioritising rental growth as their key performance indicator, raising doubts about the long-term sustainability of such practices.

The issue of rising rents has also surfaced in other community facilities.

In Tengah, Khoo noted tender prices of S$36,000 for a general practitioner (GP) clinic, S$122,000 for a food court, and S$249,344 for a supermarket.

A separate record-high bid of S$52,188 for a GP clinic in Tampines in June 2024 drew comment from Health Minister Ong Ye Kung, who described the figure as “dismaying” and potentially harmful to healthcare affordability.

In response, the Ministry of Health (MOH) and HDB launched a new tender framework in May 2025.

Under the revised Price-Quality Method (PQM), 70% of evaluation weight is placed on service quality, with rental offers accounting for the remaining 30%.

However, Khoo questioned whether the reforms would make a meaningful difference.

He cited a Tengah GP clinic rated poorly by residents, with reports of no doctors on-site and reliance on teleconsultations. “

If PQM does not enforce minimum quality standards, it is just rental games,” he argued.

Khoo further expressed concern that small, independent brands were being squeezed out by well-capitalised chains, including international entrants.

He warned that coffee shops in new estates were already selling for S$30 million to S$40 million, with stall rents exceeding S$10,000 to S$12,000 monthly.

“This is the new trend—heritage stores out, mega brands in,” he said, cautioning that local operators may increasingly vanish from the marketplace.

Public frustration over wider cost-of-living pressures
Public frustration has mounted over rising costs in Singapore, with online commentators criticising what they see as policy contradictions.

Some lamented that while graduates were encouraged to become hawkers or blue-collar workers, the government has allowed rents for hawker stalls, HDB units and condominiums to escalate, alongside soaring Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices.

They also noted limited eligibility for Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers, low employment rates, and retirees unable to fully access their Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings.

Others blamed real estate investment trusts (REITs) for driving landlords to raise rents, arguing that such practices prioritise fund managers’ metrics over tenants’ survival.

Commenters pointed out that most F&B outlets in malls are subsidiaries of large corporations, leaving little space for small enterprises burdened by high rentals and rising costs of goods.

Several argued that monthly rents of S$8,000, excluding additional fees, require daily sales of at least S$1,500 to break even, making small operations unsustainable.

Some predicted that eating out could eventually decline as prices surpass consumer tolerance, forcing a shift towards home-prepared meals and reducing kopitiams to “stranded assets”.

Others countered that many local SMEs still succeed, stressing that business resilience often depends on innovation rather than external conditions.


Broader calls for rental reform
The discussion reflects a larger issue: SMEs, especially in F&B, face growing pressure from unsustainable rent hikes.

In May, a bakery near Sembawang Road saw a 15% increase in rent, while a cake shop in Siglap faced a jump from S$5,400 to S$8,500—an increase of 57%—which led its owner to shut down.

On 12 June, advocacy group Singapore Tenants United For Fairness (SGTUFF) called for urgent structural reforms to help SMEs stay afloat.

Their recommendations include short-term relief and long-term policy recalibration.

Among their proposals: rental caps tied to inflation and a national reassessment of urban planning and commercial land use priorities.

Share this:
 
Concerns rise over record-breaking HDB coffee shop rents and impact on F&B operators
Coffee shop rents in Singapore have surged to record highs, sparking concerns over food affordability and the survival of small F&B operators. In his TikTok post, former F&B owner Khoo Keat Hwee warns that unsustainable rental norms, driven by large investors and REITs, risk displacing local businesses and raising everyday living costs for residents.


Published

on

3 September 2025
Coffee shop rents in Singapore have reached unprecedented levels, raising questions about affordability for residents and sustainability for food and beverage (F&B) operators.

Khoo Keat Hwee, 38, founder of Mentai-Ya Japanese Cuisine and an F&B consultant, highlighted the issue in a recent series of social media posts.

He pointed to record-breaking tenders in Housing and Development Board (HDB) estates, calling the trend “unsustainable”.

Record-breaking tenders for HDB coffee shop
In February 2024, Chang Cheng Mee Wah secured the tender for Block 633 Tampines North Drive 2 with a monthly rent of S$88,889.


A coffee shop at Block 431A Northshore Drive in Punggol was tendered in May 2024 for S$62,888 per month, while another outlet in Bidadari reached S$73,888 in March 2025.


Khoo questioned whether these figures could become “new rental norms”, pushing food prices even higher in estates such as Tampines North, Punggol, and Bidadari.

He contrasted the current landscape with less than a decade ago, when monthly coffee shop rents typically ranged between S$30,000 and S$40,000.

By his calculation, a S$80,000 rent could translate into S$8,000 per stall, or S$61 per square foot each month before goods and services tax.

An online listing in a F&B rental Facebook group in July advertised a stall takeover opportunity at Chang Cheng Mee Wah’s coffee shop at 633 Tampines North Drive 2.

The rental was S$6,000 per month for the first year and S$6,500 for the second and third years, excluding maintenance, POS, dish collection, and pest control fees.


“To survive, a stall needs daily sales of at least S$1,000, equivalent to selling 200 plates of S$5 chicken rice every day just to break even,” Khoo noted.

He cited the closure of OK Chicken Rice’s outlet at Block 660A Edgedale Plains in Punggol as an example, despite the stall generating about S$30,000 in monthly sales.

Khoo criticised larger companies for treating coffee shops as long-term investment assets, which he said encouraged higher bids and rapid stall turnover.

“Low footfall, high rents, tenants come, tenants go,” he remarked.

Investment-driven rental escalation and REITs’ role
His concerns extended beyond HDB coffee shops.

In a separate commentary on TikTok, Khoo pointed to shopping malls such as Paya Lebar Quarter (PLQ), where he observed frequent tenant changes, including multiple food stalls shutting down.

He argued that real estate investment trusts (REITs) were prioritising rental growth as their key performance indicator, raising doubts about the long-term sustainability of such practices.

The issue of rising rents has also surfaced in other community facilities.

In Tengah, Khoo noted tender prices of S$36,000 for a general practitioner (GP) clinic, S$122,000 for a food court, and S$249,344 for a supermarket.

A separate record-high bid of S$52,188 for a GP clinic in Tampines in June 2024 drew comment from Health Minister Ong Ye Kung, who described the figure as “dismaying” and potentially harmful to healthcare affordability.

In response, the Ministry of Health (MOH) and HDB launched a new tender framework in May 2025.

Under the revised Price-Quality Method (PQM), 70% of evaluation weight is placed on service quality, with rental offers accounting for the remaining 30%.

However, Khoo questioned whether the reforms would make a meaningful difference.

He cited a Tengah GP clinic rated poorly by residents, with reports of no doctors on-site and reliance on teleconsultations. “

If PQM does not enforce minimum quality standards, it is just rental games,” he argued.

Khoo further expressed concern that small, independent brands were being squeezed out by well-capitalised chains, including international entrants.

He warned that coffee shops in new estates were already selling for S$30 million to S$40 million, with stall rents exceeding S$10,000 to S$12,000 monthly.

“This is the new trend—heritage stores out, mega brands in,” he said, cautioning that local operators may increasingly vanish from the marketplace.

Public frustration over wider cost-of-living pressures
Public frustration has mounted over rising costs in Singapore, with online commentators criticising what they see as policy contradictions.

Some lamented that while graduates were encouraged to become hawkers or blue-collar workers, the government has allowed rents for hawker stalls, HDB units and condominiums to escalate, alongside soaring Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices.

They also noted limited eligibility for Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers, low employment rates, and retirees unable to fully access their Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings.

Others blamed real estate investment trusts (REITs) for driving landlords to raise rents, arguing that such practices prioritise fund managers’ metrics over tenants’ survival.

Commenters pointed out that most F&B outlets in malls are subsidiaries of large corporations, leaving little space for small enterprises burdened by high rentals and rising costs of goods.

Several argued that monthly rents of S$8,000, excluding additional fees, require daily sales of at least S$1,500 to break even, making small operations unsustainable.

Some predicted that eating out could eventually decline as prices surpass consumer tolerance, forcing a shift towards home-prepared meals and reducing kopitiams to “stranded assets”.

Others countered that many local SMEs still succeed, stressing that business resilience often depends on innovation rather than external conditions.


Broader calls for rental reform
The discussion reflects a larger issue: SMEs, especially in F&B, face growing pressure from unsustainable rent hikes.

In May, a bakery near Sembawang Road saw a 15% increase in rent, while a cake shop in Siglap faced a jump from S$5,400 to S$8,500—an increase of 57%—which led its owner to shut down.

On 12 June, advocacy group Singapore Tenants United For Fairness (SGTUFF) called for urgent structural reforms to help SMEs stay afloat.

Their recommendations include short-term relief and long-term policy recalibration.

Among their proposals: rental caps tied to inflation and a national reassessment of urban planning and commercial land use priorities.

Share this:
 
Concerns rise over record-breaking HDB coffee shop rents and impact on F&B operators
Coffee shop rents in Singapore have surged to record highs, sparking concerns over food affordability and the survival of small F&B operators. In his TikTok post, former F&B owner Khoo Keat Hwee warns that unsustainable rental norms, driven by large investors and REITs, risk displacing local businesses and raising everyday living costs for residents.


Published

on

3 September 2025
Coffee shop rents in Singapore have reached unprecedented levels, raising questions about affordability for residents and sustainability for food and beverage (F&B) operators.

Khoo Keat Hwee, 38, founder of Mentai-Ya Japanese Cuisine and an F&B consultant, highlighted the issue in a recent series of social media posts.

He pointed to record-breaking tenders in Housing and Development Board (HDB) estates, calling the trend “unsustainable”.

Record-breaking tenders for HDB coffee shop
In February 2024, Chang Cheng Mee Wah secured the tender for Block 633 Tampines North Drive 2 with a monthly rent of S$88,889.


A coffee shop at Block 431A Northshore Drive in Punggol was tendered in May 2024 for S$62,888 per month, while another outlet in Bidadari reached S$73,888 in March 2025.


Khoo questioned whether these figures could become “new rental norms”, pushing food prices even higher in estates such as Tampines North, Punggol, and Bidadari.

He contrasted the current landscape with less than a decade ago, when monthly coffee shop rents typically ranged between S$30,000 and S$40,000.

By his calculation, a S$80,000 rent could translate into S$8,000 per stall, or S$61 per square foot each month before goods and services tax.

An online listing in a F&B rental Facebook group in July advertised a stall takeover opportunity at Chang Cheng Mee Wah’s coffee shop at 633 Tampines North Drive 2.

The rental was S$6,000 per month for the first year and S$6,500 for the second and third years, excluding maintenance, POS, dish collection, and pest control fees.


“To survive, a stall needs daily sales of at least S$1,000, equivalent to selling 200 plates of S$5 chicken rice every day just to break even,” Khoo noted.

He cited the closure of OK Chicken Rice’s outlet at Block 660A Edgedale Plains in Punggol as an example, despite the stall generating about S$30,000 in monthly sales.

Khoo criticised larger companies for treating coffee shops as long-term investment assets, which he said encouraged higher bids and rapid stall turnover.

“Low footfall, high rents, tenants come, tenants go,” he remarked.

Investment-driven rental escalation and REITs’ role
His concerns extended beyond HDB coffee shops.

In a separate commentary on TikTok, Khoo pointed to shopping malls such as Paya Lebar Quarter (PLQ), where he observed frequent tenant changes, including multiple food stalls shutting down.

He argued that real estate investment trusts (REITs) were prioritising rental growth as their key performance indicator, raising doubts about the long-term sustainability of such practices.

The issue of rising rents has also surfaced in other community facilities.

In Tengah, Khoo noted tender prices of S$36,000 for a general practitioner (GP) clinic, S$122,000 for a food court, and S$249,344 for a supermarket.

A separate record-high bid of S$52,188 for a GP clinic in Tampines in June 2024 drew comment from Health Minister Ong Ye Kung, who described the figure as “dismaying” and potentially harmful to healthcare affordability.

In response, the Ministry of Health (MOH) and HDB launched a new tender framework in May 2025.

Under the revised Price-Quality Method (PQM), 70% of evaluation weight is placed on service quality, with rental offers accounting for the remaining 30%.

However, Khoo questioned whether the reforms would make a meaningful difference.

He cited a Tengah GP clinic rated poorly by residents, with reports of no doctors on-site and reliance on teleconsultations. “

If PQM does not enforce minimum quality standards, it is just rental games,” he argued.

Khoo further expressed concern that small, independent brands were being squeezed out by well-capitalised chains, including international entrants.

He warned that coffee shops in new estates were already selling for S$30 million to S$40 million, with stall rents exceeding S$10,000 to S$12,000 monthly.

“This is the new trend—heritage stores out, mega brands in,” he said, cautioning that local operators may increasingly vanish from the marketplace.

Public frustration over wider cost-of-living pressures
Public frustration has mounted over rising costs in Singapore, with online commentators criticising what they see as policy contradictions.

Some lamented that while graduates were encouraged to become hawkers or blue-collar workers, the government has allowed rents for hawker stalls, HDB units and condominiums to escalate, alongside soaring Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices.

They also noted limited eligibility for Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers, low employment rates, and retirees unable to fully access their Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings.

Others blamed real estate investment trusts (REITs) for driving landlords to raise rents, arguing that such practices prioritise fund managers’ metrics over tenants’ survival.

Commenters pointed out that most F&B outlets in malls are subsidiaries of large corporations, leaving little space for small enterprises burdened by high rentals and rising costs of goods.

Several argued that monthly rents of S$8,000, excluding additional fees, require daily sales of at least S$1,500 to break even, making small operations unsustainable.

Some predicted that eating out could eventually decline as prices surpass consumer tolerance, forcing a shift towards home-prepared meals and reducing kopitiams to “stranded assets”.

Others countered that many local SMEs still succeed, stressing that business resilience often depends on innovation rather than external conditions.


Broader calls for rental reform
The discussion reflects a larger issue: SMEs, especially in F&B, face growing pressure from unsustainable rent hikes.

In May, a bakery near Sembawang Road saw a 15% increase in rent, while a cake shop in Siglap faced a jump from S$5,400 to S$8,500—an increase of 57%—which led its owner to shut down.

On 12 June, advocacy group Singapore Tenants United For Fairness (SGTUFF) called for urgent structural reforms to help SMEs stay afloat.

Their recommendations include short-term relief and long-term policy recalibration.

Among their proposals: rental caps tied to inflation and a national reassessment of urban planning and commercial land use priorities.

Share this:
And stupid 65% sinkies still vote for greedy PAP motherfuckers
 
Back
Top