truly fucked up - ccp company steals and copies ccp company’s ai codes in tiongcock

[Hypocrite-The]

You see it in Sinkieland: Tiong mala restaurant copycat another Tiong mala restaurant, Tiong massage spa copycat another Tiong massage spa. Utterly unimaginative and shameless, that's what trashy Tiongs are.

So consumer wins through increase competition?

 

[eatshitndie]

So consumer wins through increase competition?

it’s a race to the bottom. at the end no one survives. even the last one standing cannot make ends meet anymore, will eventually kaput. and the cycle starts again with new entrants.

 

[congo9]

So consumer wins through increase competition?

Competition comes from different places.

 

[winnipegjets]

in amerika it’s patent infringement, in tiongcock it’s cannibalism. pigs eat pigs, rats eat rats.

China has true capitalism ...survival of the fittest.

 

[winnipegjets]

it’s a race to the bottom. at the end no one survives. even the last one standing cannot make ends meet anymore, will eventually kaput. and the cycle starts again with new entrants.

Creative destruction ...that's how the world need to work to clear out the deadwood.

 

[winnipegjets]

69 years of commie cannibalism and backstabbing.

This is true competition. Pure capitalism practised by Ah Tiongs ...unbelievable.

 

[eatshitndie]

Creative destruction ...that's how the world need to work to clear out the deadwood.

to clear out deadwood best is to burn.

 

[eatshitndie]

This is true competition. Pure capitalism practised by Ah Tiongs ...unbelievable.

unlike ntuc (the cunt spelled correctly) which is cronyism disguised as competition.

 

[zhihau]

You mean AI codes also got SuZhou’ed? What’s new?

 

[eatshitndie]

China has true capitalism ...survival of the fittest.

unless state-owned enterprises compete or more correctly compete-not as the state kills the competition with a state-owned protection racket.

 

[Eisenhut]

Everyone starts by copying. There is no real giant leap in technology. Japanese , Korean also copy and then innovate

 

[winnipegjets]

unless state-owned enterprises compete or more correctly compete-not as the state kills the competition with a state-owned protection racket.

It is hard to do business in China ...competition is fierce and rules are opaque. Of course, you don't compete against SOE unless you are big and well-connected; it is no different from that in the US.

 

[eatshitndie]

It is hard to do business in China ...competition is fierce and rules are opaque. Of course, you don't compete against SOE unless you are big and well-connected; it is no different from that in the US.

by now it should be consumer’s choice is king in tiongcock. they call the shots when it cums to spending money.

 

[superpower]

China has true capitalism ...survival of the fittest.

Spot on. China has the purest form of capitalism - jungle capitalism. Samsters who still think China has a commie economy should have their heads re-examined.

Unregulated free markets, minimum rules exploitation, ethical lapses, survival of the fittest. Even the state-owned enterprises compete in the jungle. Ironic for a country under decades of central command economy.

For better or worse, it makes Amercican 'capitalism' look sissy by contrast with its myriad laws and regulations and distortions in the form of subsidies and tariffs and sanctions.

 

[eatshitndie]

Spot on. China has the purest form of capitalism - jungle capitalism. Samsters who still think China has a commie economy should have their heads re-examined.

Unregulated free markets, minimum rules exploitation, ethical lapses, survival of the fittest. Even the state-owned enterprises compete in the jungle. Ironic for a country under decades of central command economy.

For better or worse, it makes Amercican 'capitalism' look sissy by contrast with its myriad laws and regulations and distortions in the form of subsidies and tariffs and sanctions.

“jungle capitalism” doesn’t exist. it’s incestuous cannibalism. insects eating each other while they mate.

 

[superpower]

“jungle capitalism” doesn’t exist. it’s incestuous cannibalism. insects eating each other while they mate.

Actually America went through a long phase of jungle capitalism in the 19th and early 20th century. Even wilder Jungle than China today with slavery, labor exploitation, zero safety and environmental regulations, rampant corruption, organized crime, no legal recourse. China came off the commie era into a world that's already governed by international trade rules and regulations and the need for joint ventures with the West and to lock in into the international trading and financial ecosystem.

To some degree, jungle capitalism occurs in most developing countries going through a phase of rapid development and industrialization, with the regulatory and legal frameworks lagging behind. There will be environmental degradation, corruption, worker exploitation, huge income gap, no social safety nets, a race to the bottom for enterprises resulting in the leanest, meanest surviving.

China's example is stark because while the West had 200 years to industrialize and get out of the jungle, China telescoped what the West went through in less than 3 decades: China's economic rise is widely regarded as the world's fastest in recorded history - 9% annual GDP growth over 3 decades, lifting 800 mil out of abject poverty.

 

[eatshitndie]

Actually America went through a long phase of jungle capitalism in the 19th and early 20th century. Even wilder Jungle than China today with slavery, labor exploitation, zero safety and environmental regulations, rampant corruption, organized crime, no legal recourse. China came off the commie era into a world that's already governed by international trade rules and regulations and the need for joint ventures with the West and to lock in into the international trading and financial ecosystem.

To some degree, jungle capitalism occurs in most developing countries going through a phase of rapid development and industrialization, with the regulatory and legal frameworks lagging behind. There will be environmental degradation, corruption, worker exploitation, huge income gap, no social safety nets, a race to the bottom for enterprises resulting in the leanest, meanest surviving.

China's example is stark because while the West had 200 years to industrialize and get out of the jungle, China telescoped what the West went through in less than 3 decades: China's economic rise is widely regarded as the world's fastest in recorded history - 9% annual GDP growth over 3 decades, lifting 800 mil out of abject poverty.

and then pulling the carpet in 6.9 years of xi to let 699m tiongs fall back into poverty (as mentioned by the late pm li keqiang). that’s also another record.

 

[laksaboy]

“jungle capitalism” doesn’t exist. it’s incestuous cannibalism. insects eating each other while they mate.

Only retards believe China is a capitalist country. At its very core it is still a centrally planned economy. Its so-called 'wealth' is caused by swindling its way into the WTO. The mistake of 2001 is being reversed now.

 

[superpower]

Only retards believe China is a capitalist country. At its very core it is still a centrally planned economy. Its so-called 'wealth' is caused by swindling its way into the WTO. The mistake of 2001 is being reversed now.

You're really an idiot - do you even know what 'capitalism' means? And what 'jungle capitalism' means?

Maybe let the Harvard Business Review educate you:

https://hbr.org/2021/05/americans-dont-know-how-capitalist-china-is

“Americans Don’t Know How Capitalist China Is”​

An interview with Weijian Shan by Adi Ignatius

Weijian Shan understands the delicate U.S.-China dynamic as well as anyone. He was born in China, and his life was upended during the Cultural Revolution, when he was sent off to do farm labor in the Gobi Desert. Eventually he came to the United States, where he earned a master’s and a PhD at UC Berkeley, worked for the World Bank and J.P. Morgan, and taught at the Wharton School. A candid observer of Asian society and business, Shan is the author of Out of the Gobi: My Story of China and America and the newly published Money Games: The Inside Story of How American Dealmakers Saved Korea’s Most Iconic Bank. Now CEO of the Hong Kong–based $40 billion private-equity firm PAG, Shan spoke with HBR Editor in Chief Adi Ignatius about the economic prospects for China and the United States.

HBR: China’s economy seems to be the healthiest in the world at the moment. Does that create new investment opportunities?

Shan: Despite initial blunders, China has handled the coronavirus pandemic well through strict lockdowns and mass testing. Its GDP dropped 6.8% in the first quarter of 2020, but resumed growth from the second quarter onward. China has been shifting away from an investment-driven growth model to one led by private consumption. A decade ago its retail-goods market was about $1.8 trillion—less than half that of the United States. In 2019 that market reached $6 trillion, surpassing the U.S. level of $5.5 trillion. Even now China’s private consumption represents only about 39% of its GDP—way below the U.S. level of 68% and the world average of 63%. That leaves much room for growth and many opportunities for investors, particularly in businesses that cater to consumers.

Investors have always been enticed by China’s vast market. How accessible is it these days?

Our firm, PAG, invests throughout Asia and occasionally beyond. China’s is the only major economy that requires no special approval for foreign direct investments, although some sectors, such as Lived Change media and the internet, are on a “negative list” that restricts them. However, there are usually lawful ways to get around that. PAG invested about $100 million in a digital music business in China a few years back which subsequently merged with a similar business and changed its name to Tencent Music Entertainment. Today it’s traded on the New York Stock Exchange with a market cap of about $45 billion and has more than 800 million unique active users. The name of the game in China is scale. If a business is successful, it’s usually open to taking outside capital so that it can quickly expand nationwide. That’s why China is the most active private-equity market in Asia.

Trade wars, nationalism, and the pandemic have led many companies to question their supply chain strategy—in particular basing manufacturing in China, thousands of miles from their markets. Are you seeing a significant shift in supply chains out of China?

Some manufacturing has been relocated away from China since the trade war with the U.S. began in 2018, but that hasn’t made a dent in either China’s exports or America’s trade deficit. In fact, the pandemic has made the world more dependent on Chinese exports, which grew 21% in November over the previous year. The point is that a China-based supply chain has proved a blessing, not a curse, in this pandemic. Any shift in supply chains will be gradual and partial, because it’s very costly to move from the most efficient supplier to the second or third best. American companies will do so only if U.S. tariffs become more penalizing than moving would be. Also, while it’s relatively easy to shift the sourcing of a low-value-added product from China to Vietnam or Mexico, how can you move an entire supply chain with many indigenous players? And what if the market itself is in China? GM sells more cars in China than in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico combined. Where can it move its production if the target market is China? China is also Apple’s biggest market for iPhones: It has about twice as many iPhone users as the United States does.

The U.S. continues to vilify China, and China does itself no favors with its poor policy on human rights. How can outside investors ensure that they don’t become collateral damage in a bigger political and economic war?

Both countries have human rights issues, although in different forms. Investors anywhere should invest in a socially responsible way to advance human rights, adhering to a high standard for labor practices, gender equality, investment in human capital, and charitable contributions. Wherever PAG operates, we adhere to the same environmental, social, and governance policies.

 

[congo9]

Actually America went through a long phase of jungle capitalism in the 19th and early 20th century. Even wilder Jungle than China today with slavery, labor exploitation, zero safety and environmental regulations, rampant corruption, organized crime, no legal recourse. China came off the commie era into a world that's already governed by international trade rules and regulations and the need for joint ventures with the West and to lock in into the international trading and financial ecosystem.

To some degree, jungle capitalism occurs in most developing countries going through a phase of rapid development and industrialization, with the regulatory and legal frameworks lagging behind. There will be environmental degradation, corruption, worker exploitation, huge income gap, no social safety nets, a race to the bottom for enterprises resulting in the leanest, meanest surviving.

China's example is stark because while the West had 200 years to industrialize and get out of the jungle, China telescoped what the West went through in less than 3 decades: China's economic rise is widely regarded as the world's fastest in recorded history - 9% annual GDP growth over 3 decades, lifting 800 mil out of abject poverty.

Wrong ..
600 million population is still living within or below1000rmb in china.
Now china's graduate is earning 5000rmb in 1st tier city.
The lifting of poorest population from their misery is all but piece of lie, quite similar to Lei Jun On how he market his Xiaomi Su7.