Nah Baey now tell sinkies that new sinkie law can bargain and argue off like their poke backside offence law .. sinkieland law is a joke now?

WangChuk

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Messages
3,452
Points
113
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/c...rral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c10

singapore

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng​

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng

Enforcement of the pedestrian-only pathways will be 'reasonable', Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng said on Wednesday (July 2).
PHOTO: AsiaOne file/Ong Chin Wee
PUBLISHED ON July 03, 2025 3:52 PM By Khoo Yi-Hang

Enforcement of the new pedestrian-only paths will be "reasonable", Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng assured in a Facebook post on Wednesday (July 2).

Beginning on Tuesday, cyclists as well as motorised and non-motorised personal mobility device (PMD) users will face severe penalties for using pedestrian-only paths.

First-time offenders can be fined up to $2,000 or jailed for up to three months, or both.

Following that, some cyclists have voiced their concerns, arguing that the penalties are only applied to cyclists and mobility device users while pedestrians can still traverse both pathways legally.

On Facebook group Singapore Park Connector Network (PCN) Cyclist, some users have expressed their displeasure towards the new regulation.

"Not going [to] fine pedestrians but only cyclists?" One user questioned. "Why not ask the pedestrian to jaywalk on the road, and cars must give way, if not fine the driver?"

There were also concerns about how cyclists should navigate overtaking slower parties or pedestrians on the cycling path.

Asked a user: "If I overtake them and ride on the pedestrian-only path, will I also get fined?"

Another complained: "Pedestrians are allowed to walk on the cycling path (and are) only encouraged not to. If cyclists cycle on the pedestrian path, cyclists would be fined or jailed. Double standards!"

Enforcement officers to consider 'ground situation': Baey​

In his Facebook post, Baey said he understands that cyclists are concerned about this change, and worried about being targeted and fined.

"I want to reassure everyone that our enforcement approach will be reasonable, and enforcement officers will consider the ground situation," Baey stated, providing examples of extenuating circumstances such as cyclists veering off to avoid obstacles or overtaking slower path users.

Explaining the rationale behind this regulation, he shared that pedestrians, especially the elderly and young children, are the most vulnerable users of these paths.

And users of active mobility devices (including bicycles) travelling at faster speeds should always keep a lookout for users, particularly pedestrians who travel at lower speeds while using the paths.

He stressed that the priority for enforcement is against errant cyclists who speed or ride in reckless manners that pose danger to others.

The regulation, while important, is only one part of keeping users safe, Baey said.

"We need to cultivate a culture of gracious path sharing, and protect the safety of the most vulnerable, especially with our ageing population."
 
Cyclist will also be pedestrians at times de woh.
Those complianer sounds like they are born with 4 wheels instead of 2 legs.
 
Wh
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/c...rral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c10

singapore

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng​

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng

Enforcement of the pedestrian-only pathways will be 'reasonable', Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng said on Wednesday (July 2).
PHOTO: AsiaOne file/Ong Chin Wee
PUBLISHED ON July 03, 2025 3:52 PM By Khoo Yi-Hang

Enforcement of the new pedestrian-only paths will be "reasonable", Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng assured in a Facebook post on Wednesday (July 2).

Beginning on Tuesday, cyclists as well as motorised and non-motorised personal mobility device (PMD) users will face severe penalties for using pedestrian-only paths.

First-time offenders can be fined up to $2,000 or jailed for up to three months, or both.

Following that, some cyclists have voiced their concerns, arguing that the penalties are only applied to cyclists and mobility device users while pedestrians can still traverse both pathways legally.

On Facebook group Singapore Park Connector Network (PCN) Cyclist, some users have expressed their displeasure towards the new regulation.

"Not going [to] fine pedestrians but only cyclists?" One user questioned. "Why not ask the pedestrian to jaywalk on the road, and cars must give way, if not fine the driver?"

There were also concerns about how cyclists should navigate overtaking slower parties or pedestrians on the cycling path.

Asked a user: "If I overtake them and ride on the pedestrian-only path, will I also get fined?"

Another complained: "Pedestrians are allowed to walk on the cycling path (and are) only encouraged not to. If cyclists cycle on the pedestrian path, cyclists would be fined or jailed. Double standards!"

Enforcement officers to consider 'ground situation': Baey​

In his Facebook post, Baey said he understands that cyclists are concerned about this change, and worried about being targeted and fined.

"I want to reassure everyone that our enforcement approach will be reasonable, and enforcement officers will consider the ground situation," Baey stated, providing examples of extenuating circumstances such as cyclists veering off to avoid obstacles or overtaking slower path users.

Explaining the rationale behind this regulation, he shared that pedestrians, especially the elderly and young children, are the most vulnerable users of these paths.

And users of active mobility devices (including bicycles) travelling at faster speeds should always keep a lookout for users, particularly pedestrians who travel at lower speeds while using the paths.

He stressed that the priority for enforcement is against errant cyclists who speed or ride in reckless manners that pose danger to others.

The regulation, while important, is only one part of keeping users safe, Baey said.

"We need to cultivate a culture of gracious path sharing, and protect the safety of the most vulnerable, especially with our ageing population."
Who is Baey to interprete and enforce the law? He is confusing the pedestrians and cyclists, the law enforcers too!
 
Last edited:
nothing new what, sinkie law (and sinkie life) has always been like that. depending on which side of the line you belong, they will redraw the line if necessary
 
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/c...rral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c10

singapore

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng​

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng

Enforcement of the pedestrian-only pathways will be 'reasonable', Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng said on Wednesday (July 2).
PHOTO: AsiaOne file/Ong Chin Wee
PUBLISHED ON July 03, 2025 3:52 PM By Khoo Yi-Hang

Enforcement of the new pedestrian-only paths will be "reasonable", Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng assured in a Facebook post on Wednesday (July 2).

Beginning on Tuesday, cyclists as well as motorised and non-motorised personal mobility device (PMD) users will face severe penalties for using pedestrian-only paths.

First-time offenders can be fined up to $2,000 or jailed for up to three months, or both.

Following that, some cyclists have voiced their concerns, arguing that the penalties are only applied to cyclists and mobility device users while pedestrians can still traverse both pathways legally.

On Facebook group Singapore Park Connector Network (PCN) Cyclist, some users have expressed their displeasure towards the new regulation.

"Not going [to] fine pedestrians but only cyclists?" One user questioned. "Why not ask the pedestrian to jaywalk on the road, and cars must give way, if not fine the driver?"

There were also concerns about how cyclists should navigate overtaking slower parties or pedestrians on the cycling path.

Asked a user: "If I overtake them and ride on the pedestrian-only path, will I also get fined?"

Another complained: "Pedestrians are allowed to walk on the cycling path (and are) only encouraged not to. If cyclists cycle on the pedestrian path, cyclists would be fined or jailed. Double standards!"

Enforcement officers to consider 'ground situation': Baey​

In his Facebook post, Baey said he understands that cyclists are concerned about this change, and worried about being targeted and fined.

"I want to reassure everyone that our enforcement approach will be reasonable, and enforcement officers will consider the ground situation," Baey stated, providing examples of extenuating circumstances such as cyclists veering off to avoid obstacles or overtaking slower path users.

Explaining the rationale behind this regulation, he shared that pedestrians, especially the elderly and young children, are the most vulnerable users of these paths.

And users of active mobility devices (including bicycles) travelling at faster speeds should always keep a lookout for users, particularly pedestrians who travel at lower speeds while using the paths.

He stressed that the priority for enforcement is against errant cyclists who speed or ride in reckless manners that pose danger to others.

The regulation, while important, is only one part of keeping users safe, Baey said.

"We need to cultivate a culture of gracious path sharing, and protect the safety of the most vulnerable, especially with our ageing population."


This is dumb everyone can easily share congested streets we could do it harmoniously in the 60s and 70s during LKY's iron fisted rule there is no reason why we cannot do the same today. .... Trishaws, pedestrians, cars, taxis, motorbikes, push carts all coexisting with very few incidents.

Just let nature take it's course and the natural order of things will play out.

 
This is dumb everyone can easily share congested streets we could do it harmoniously in the 60s and 70s during LKY's iron fisted rule there is no reason why we cannot do the same today. .... Trishaws, pedestrians, cars, taxis, motorbikes, push carts all coexisting with very few incidents.

Just let nature take it's course and the natural order of things will play out.



sounds like U live in Landed Property in atas estates and driving out to shopping malls type .... confirm U never use legs walk on the footpath in HDB estates and market area type .... :whistling:
 
sounds like U live in Landed Property in atas estates and driving out to shopping malls type .... confirm U never use legs walk on the footpath in HDB estates and market area type .... :whistling:

Of course I have. The problem is that the regulators are trying to segregate different modes of transport.... ie pedestrians here, cyclists there and motorists somewhere else instead of just telling everyone that they have to learn to coexist on the same real estate or face the consequences of their own foolish actions.

As a result the harmony that once existed when everyone had equal right to the use of the road has now become a fight over who has more rights and who has less.

Just take a look at other Asian cities with less regulations and you'll marvel at the volume of traffic that the system can carry in relative safety. If everyone claimed "right of way" there'd be hundreds dead on a daily basis.


 
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/c...rral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c10

singapore

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng​

Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng

Enforcement of the pedestrian-only pathways will be 'reasonable', Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng said on Wednesday (July 2).
PHOTO: AsiaOne file/Ong Chin Wee
PUBLISHED ON July 03, 2025 3:52 PM By Khoo Yi-Hang

Enforcement of the new pedestrian-only paths will be "reasonable", Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng assured in a Facebook post on Wednesday (July 2).

Beginning on Tuesday, cyclists as well as motorised and non-motorised personal mobility device (PMD) users will face severe penalties for using pedestrian-only paths.

First-time offenders can be fined up to $2,000 or jailed for up to three months, or both.

Following that, some cyclists have voiced their concerns, arguing that the penalties are only applied to cyclists and mobility device users while pedestrians can still traverse both pathways legally.

On Facebook group Singapore Park Connector Network (PCN) Cyclist, some users have expressed their displeasure towards the new regulation.

"Not going [to] fine pedestrians but only cyclists?" One user questioned. "Why not ask the pedestrian to jaywalk on the road, and cars must give way, if not fine the driver?"

There were also concerns about how cyclists should navigate overtaking slower parties or pedestrians on the cycling path.

Asked a user: "If I overtake them and ride on the pedestrian-only path, will I also get fined?"

Another complained: "Pedestrians are allowed to walk on the cycling path (and are) only encouraged not to. If cyclists cycle on the pedestrian path, cyclists would be fined or jailed. Double standards!"

Enforcement officers to consider 'ground situation': Baey​

In his Facebook post, Baey said he understands that cyclists are concerned about this change, and worried about being targeted and fined.

"I want to reassure everyone that our enforcement approach will be reasonable, and enforcement officers will consider the ground situation," Baey stated, providing examples of extenuating circumstances such as cyclists veering off to avoid obstacles or overtaking slower path users.

Explaining the rationale behind this regulation, he shared that pedestrians, especially the elderly and young children, are the most vulnerable users of these paths.

And users of active mobility devices (including bicycles) travelling at faster speeds should always keep a lookout for users, particularly pedestrians who travel at lower speeds while using the paths.

He stressed that the priority for enforcement is against errant cyclists who speed or ride in reckless manners that pose danger to others.

The regulation, while important, is only one part of keeping users safe, Baey said.

"We need to cultivate a culture of gracious path sharing, and protect the safety of the most vulnerable, especially with our ageing population."
Now cyclists are treated like car drivers and they don't like it... hahahahaha the shoe is on the other foot now
 
Cyclist will also be pedestrians at times de woh. Those complianer sounds like they are born with 4 wheels instead of 2 legs.
I rode a motorcycle during my NS and NUS days, before switching to a car a few years after I started working full-time. I realised how dangerous it was for us bikers in my younger days, but now see how difficult it is for drivers to avoid mishaps, owing to the manner in which many irresponsible riders weave in and out of lanes, split lanes and switch lanes w/o signalling.
 
sounds like U live in Landed Property in atas estates and driving out to shopping malls type .... confirm U never use legs walk on the footpath in HDB estates and market area type .... :whistling:
I live in a leafy area of S'pore where walking and jogging are fun ways to exercise, but cyclists make it dangerous for those on foot by speeding even on narrow footpaths and tracks along the rail corridor.
 
What a stupid totalitarian shithole regime. All it does is create some dead-end jobs for the poodles, and collect some fines. :rolleyes:

Bicycles have bells and brakes... there is a reason for that. :roflmao:

I am a pedestrian and I enjoy walking on the red half of the pavement, makes me feel as though I am walking on the Hollywood red carpet. Come and arrest me lah. :FU:
 
This fucking over paid mayor/MP is pro cyclists….

IMG_1248.jpeg
 
This fucking over paid mayor/MP is pro cyclists….

View attachment 223529

this is an open secret lah ... the management and committee members of all the famous big cycling associations and clubs are these powderful and leech elites that even LTA oso must kowtow to them and form a special department to cater roads and facilities for their cyclists group under the CEO .... dont play play with cyclist community of this island hor .... they power as big as papaya one :whistling:
 
It's just a stupid law.

At first I thought they painted half the pavement red because it's for celebrating SG60. :unsure:
 
Back
Top