Pak diplomat makes throat-slit gesture at UK protest over Pahalgam attack

[duluxe]

Colonel Taimur Rahat, Pakistan’s Army and Air Advisor at its High Commission in London, was captured on video making threatening gestures at Indian protesters gathered there to condemn the terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, that claimed the lives of 26 tourists.

In the footage, Colonel Rahat can be seen holding a poster of Indian Air Force Group Captain Abhinandan Varthaman. He then is seen making a gesture as though he is slitting the throats of Indian protesters. The video, which quickly went viral, shows him initially holding the poster with both hands before lowering one hand to make the throat-slitting motion towards the protesters.


Following the Pahalgam attack in Kashmir, more than 500 Indian nationals gathered outside the Pakistan High Commission on Friday to protest. The demonstrators held placards, Indian flags, and banners to express their grief over the tragedy and to demand justice for the victims. They raised slogans condemning terrorism and criticised Pakistan for allegedly sheltering terror groups responsible for the attack.


In a statement, the event organisers remarked, “Today’s protest was a call for justice and accountability. However, in a deeply troubling and disgraceful act, officials at the Pakistan High Commission were seen playing loud celebratory music during the protest. This tone-deaf response added further insult to an already painful situation. While the world mourns the victims, the high commission’s actions reflected a disturbing lack of empathy.”

“Organisers condemn the mission’s insensitive behaviour amid national mourning. This brutal terror attack, suspected to involve Pakistan-backed militants, has sparked widespread condemnation,” the statement stated.

One protester told ANI, “We have gathered here to protest against Pakistan. They have created a terror network, which led to the deaths of 26 of our people in Pahalgam. We are here to stand against this.”

Another protester said that Indians in the UK were deeply upset by the “atrocious terror attack” in Pahalgam.

Pahalgam attack: India responds with tough measures against Pakistan​

As many as 26 people were killed and more than a dozen injured when terrorists opened fire at Baisaran meadow, a popular tourist spot in Pahalgam, Kashmir, on Tuesday. The attack, claimed by Lashkar-e-Taiba's proxy group The Resistance Front, marked one of the deadliest terrorist attacks since 2019.


In the aftermath, India took unprecedented measures against Pakistan. The government suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, halting the flow of river water to Pakistan and announcing plans to increase dam capacity along the Indus basin. All visa services for Pakistani nationals were suspended, with existing visas revoked except for diplomatic and official categories. India also expelled Pakistani diplomats, closed the Attari land transit post, and downsized diplomatic missions.

Tensions escalated along the Line of Control, with exchanges of gunfire reported as both nations traded accusations over the attack. Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowed to track down and punish every perpetrator and their backers, signalling a new phase of diplomatic and security pressure on Pakistan.

 

[WangChuk]

Standard slaughtering behaviors of that religion ... be it in Arabic countries or in Asia or in Europe .... nothing new.

 

[Sikodolaukazzz]

If the Indians have any balls they should strike Pakistan now instead of going around having meetings or toking, toking toking.

If they dare to attack your poor innocent citizens on a holiday what the fuck are you doing now.

Attack attack attack. No drama acrobatics. lol

But please donch leely on the Sikhs to fight your wars.

Fight them yourselves idiots

NOW

 

[WangChuk]

If the Indians have any balls they should strike Pakistan now instead of going around having meetings or toking, toking toking.

If they dare to attack your poor innocent citizens on a holiday what the fuck are you doing now.

Attack attack attack. No drama acrobatics. lol

But please donch leely on the Sikhs to fight your wars.

Fight them yourselves idiots

NOW


View attachment 219466

Ceca ah neh neh only dare to bully and press on yellow skin chinese niah lah .... they see mossies with trump backing where got guts to retaliate or fight .... they also scared wait their heads kenna chopped and pai lotee in their temples tables ...

 

[Leongsam]

These two fucking low life countries have been at each other's throats forever and for absolutely no reason. The US should just nuke them both.

---

India and Pakistan’s conflict stems from a mix of historical, political, and cultural factors, rooted in their partition in 1947. Here’s a concise breakdown:

1. Partition and Identity: British India was divided into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan, triggering mass migrations and communal violence that killed up to 2 million people. This left deep scars, with both nations defining themselves in opposition—India as secular, Pakistan as Islamic.
2. Kashmir Dispute: The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, with a Muslim majority but a Hindu ruler, became a flashpoint. Both claimed it, leading to wars in 1947-48, 1965, and ongoing skirmishes. The Line of Control divides the region, but India controls most of it, while Pakistan supports insurgencies, and both accuse each other of aggression.
3. Religious and Cultural Tensions: Hindu-Muslim rivalry, exacerbated by partition, fuels mistrust. Political rhetoric and media on both sides often amplify these divides, portraying the other as an existential threat.
4. Political Leverage: Leaders in both countries use the conflict to rally domestic support. Hardline stances on Kashmir or cross-border issues distract from internal problems like poverty or governance.
5. External Influence: Cold War alignments (India with the USSR, Pakistan with the US) and later geopolitical games (China’s support for Pakistan, US-India ties) have prolonged tensions. Proxy wars, like Pakistan’s alleged backing of militants, keep the cycle going.
6. Nuclear Stakes: Both are nuclear powers since 1998, raising the stakes of any escalation. This deters all-out war but encourages low-intensity conflict.

Recent posts on X highlight ongoing border clashes and diplomatic spats, with no major resolution since the 2019 Pulwama attack and India’s revocation of Kashmir’s autonomy. Peace talks stall due to mutual distrust and domestic politics.
In short, it’s a toxic mix of history, territory, identity, and power plays, with no easy fix as long as both prioritize national pride over compromise.

 

[Leongsam]

Here's the clown show they put on daily.

 

[Sikodolaukazzz]

These two fucking low life countries have been at each other's throats forever and for absolutely no reason. The US should just nuke them both.

---

India and Pakistan’s conflict stems from a mix of historical, political, and cultural factors, rooted in their partition in 1947. Here’s a concise breakdown:

1. Partition and Identity: British India was divided into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan, triggering mass migrations and communal violence that killed up to 2 million people. This left deep scars, with both nations defining themselves in opposition—India as secular, Pakistan as Islamic.
2. Kashmir Dispute: The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, with a Muslim majority but a Hindu ruler, became a flashpoint. Both claimed it, leading to wars in 1947-48, 1965, and ongoing skirmishes. The Line of Control divides the region, but India controls most of it, while Pakistan supports insurgencies, and both accuse each other of aggression.
3. Religious and Cultural Tensions: Hindu-Muslim rivalry, exacerbated by partition, fuels mistrust. Political rhetoric and media on both sides often amplify these divides, portraying the other as an existential threat.
4. Political Leverage: Leaders in both countries use the conflict to rally domestic support. Hardline stances on Kashmir or cross-border issues distract from internal problems like poverty or governance.
5. External Influence: Cold War alignments (India with the USSR, Pakistan with the US) and later geopolitical games (China’s support for Pakistan, US-India ties) have prolonged tensions. Proxy wars, like Pakistan’s alleged backing of militants, keep the cycle going.
6. Nuclear Stakes: Both are nuclear powers since 1998, raising the stakes of any escalation. This deters all-out war but encourages low-intensity conflict.

Recent posts on X highlight ongoing border clashes and diplomatic spats, with no major resolution since the 2019 Pulwama attack and India’s revocation of Kashmir’s autonomy. Peace talks stall due to mutual distrust and domestic politics.
In short, it’s a toxic mix of history, territory, identity, and power plays, with no easy fix as long as both prioritize national pride over compromise.

Why you oways want USA to do your dirty work?
Do it yourself lor

 

[Sikodolaukazzz]

Here's the clown show they put on daily.

Maybe you can send Singagorean soldiers to fight them
with the Generals and you leading in front
lol

 

[jsctan]

Why guests think they can just protest at host's place? If want to protest, do buck off to Paki....