As for the old lady ,who she voted, if not wrong there will be no payout by gov, even cars also, car in carpark got spoilt dirty or wat slso no pay , last time.e hv 1 case paint drip on car also no pay, old lady if vote for pap sure tulan ,she ask for it
As for the old lady ,who she voted, if not wrong there will be no payout by gov, even cars also, car in carpark got spoilt dirty or wat slso no pay , last time.e hv 1 case paint drip on car also no pay, old lady if vote for pap sure tulan ,she ask for it
The insurers of NPark will pay him something for sure. But the Court will not rule against the Government. As long as NPark has a proper schedule for maintenance checks and NPark adheres to the schedule, there is no negligence.
NParks will not admit liability, but insurers considering the premium that NPark pays per year will definitely pay [something] on a without prejudice basis. For insurers, it' better to keep the big client happy then to lose it to another insurer.