actually, Chinese on average had bigger families than just about anybody else in history. Just our recent history it's not the case. Even just 100 years ago...
actually, Chinese on average had bigger families than just about anybody else in history. Just our recent history it's not the case. Even just 100 years ago...
I think I failed to deliver my message. I try again hokay?
Chinese genes are more procreative than mudd genes per your original reply. The numbers speak for themselves. Back when economic realities were different, the average Chinese family for generations, perhaps for centuries, produced more babies than just about anybody on earth. mudds included.
So mudd genes is a less apt explanation than she's reverting to her genetic norm.