• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Donch PAPee Give Sporns a Break?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
Feb 24, 2010

BUDGET 2010
Positive, but breaks for average S'porean would have helped

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
THIS year's Budget ('$7b boost to transform economy', yesterday) was positive about economic targets, but short on offering a balm for Singaporeans who made sacrifices to help the country weather the financial crisis. The Budget, which was unveiled in Parliament on Monday, was aimed largely at business and business-related activities.
The Budget would have been sweeter for the average Singaporean if the Government had considered the following favourably:

Lower personal income tax and road tax;

Abolishment of radio and television licence fees;

Lower conservancy service charges; and

Allowing the use of the Central Provident Fund to pay school fees.
I am certain Singaporeans are not expecting anything more as they understand that we sailed through a difficult time last year, and the Government has declared a deficit in the previous and current Budgets.
That was why I suggested rewards that amounted to a small financial bullet for the Government to bite in acknowledgement of the people's sacrifices.
Joshua Selvakumar
 
Feb 24, 2010

BUDGET 2010
Positive, but breaks for average S'porean would have helped

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
THIS year's Budget ('$7b boost to transform economy', yesterday) was positive about economic targets, but short on offering a balm for Singaporeans who made sacrifices to help the country weather the financial crisis. The Budget, which was unveiled in Parliament on Monday, was aimed largely at business and business-related activities.
The Budget would have been sweeter for the average Singaporean if the Government had considered the following favourably:

Lower personal income tax and road tax;

Abolishment of radio and television licence fees;

Lower conservancy service charges; and

Allowing the use of the Central Provident Fund to pay school fees.
I am certain Singaporeans are not expecting anything more as they understand that we sailed through a difficult time last year, and the Government has declared a deficit in the previous and current Budgets.
That was why I suggested rewards that amounted to a small financial bullet for the Government to bite in acknowledgement of the people's sacrifices.
Joshua Selvakumar

You guys voted for them. Not happy vote for someone else:o
 
Back
Top