Lawrence Wong: May not need to wear mask outdoors if vaccination rate high enough

If the population is 80% vaccinated n social distancing is maintained n face mask worn etc. How come the infection rates is increasing?
 
Then you are suppose to reply : oh that means vaccines are a failure
 
If the population is 80% vaccinated n social distancing is maintained n face mask worn etc. How come the infection rates is increasing?
Rising infection rates could be because of the Delta variant and relaxed restrictions. If the gahment is true to its strategy of living with COVID endemically and relaxes restrictions even further....please don't get your panties in a bunch when you see 10-20K infections. Infections WILL rise. But numbers mean nothing when 98% display mild to zero symptoms.
 
So wat is the point of masks n social distancing? N if it's Soo transmissible...y r not more dead?
You have the IQ of a child. :biggrin:

What's the point? Because its so transmissible, without masks and social distancing the numbers infected won't be 3-4K.

Why are not more dead? Because we have a 90% vaccination rate. Without vaccines, you'll probably need to add a few more zeroes to the 133 (?) number of dead.
 
You have the IQ of a child. :biggrin:

What's the point? Because its so transmissible, without masks and social distancing the numbers infected won't be 3-4K.

Why are not more dead? Because we have a 90% vaccination rate. Without vaccines, you'll probably need to add a few more zeroes to the 133 (?) number of dead.
So all the more reason to ditch the mask etc n give the ppl back their lives n return back to normal.
 
Rising infection rates could be because of the Delta variant and relaxed restrictions. If the gahment is true to its strategy of living with COVID endemically and relaxes restrictions even further....please don't get your panties in a bunch when you see 10-20K infections. Infections WILL rise. But numbers mean nothing when 98% display mild to zero symptoms.
So no different to a flu? Than why no restrictions due to a flu?
 
Then you are supposed to say : oh but mRNA vaccines will kill you . It’s teratogenic and contains a microchip so the government may track you
 
So all the more reason to ditch the mask etc n give the ppl back their lives n return back to normal.
Yup, I'm all for that 100%. :thumbsup:

And it will happen sooner than you think if it ain't for the pussies who don't have the courage to fully open without masks...:wink:

First step... don't publish numbers of infections anymore.:biggrin:
 
Than why r the vaccinated required to wear masks n social distancing?
Because controlling a pandemic requires multi prong approach. There is no one single silver bullet.

vaccinate , social distancing , masking , tracing , early diagnosis . Multi prong approach
 
Because controlling a pandemic requires multi prong approach. There is no one single silver bullet.

vaccinate , social distancing , masking , tracing , early diagnosis . Multi prong approach
And yet the numbers are increasing...
 
Then you are supposed to say : what about ivermectin? It’s saving lives in Brazil and India even though it’s meant to deworm cows and FDA has warned against it
 
Back
Top