• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Racist couple incident] The truth about dave parkash

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 10, 2017
Messages
4,084
Points
113
1623334976893.png


Vid at https://tinyurI.com/4h45shnv
 
To prove that Singapore is not racist, the PAP should field Dave Parkash as a candidate in a SMC in the next election. They should also suggest that someone like Dave Parkash should be able to become the Prime Minister of Singapore.

Oh wait..... I guess the older generation of Singaporeans is still racist. Open admission by DPM.

https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...reans-not-ready-non-chinese-pm-heng-swee-keat

Older generation of S'poreans not ready for non-Chinese PM: Heng Swee Keat

By WONG PEI TING
Published MARCH 28, 2019
Updated DECEMBER 25, 2019
1596 SHARES

SINGAPORE — A segment of Singapore’s population is happy to have an individual from a minority race as their prime minister, but the older generation is not ready for that.

Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat, who is expected to succeed Prime Minister (PM) Lee Hsien Loong, said this during a forum at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU) on Thursday (March 28). He was replying a question posed by a member of the audience, who noted that Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam was a popular choice to take on the top job.

In asking the question, Assistant Professor Walid Jumblatt Abdullah of NTU's School of Social Sciences’ public policy and global affairs programme, also pointed out that Mr Tharman’s popularity was evident in his constituency’s elections results.

A survey conducted by market research consultancy Blackbox in 2016 found that Mr Tharman was the top choice among Singaporeans to succeed Mr Lee, with 69 per cent of almost 900 respondents indicating that they would support him to be the candidate for prime minister.

“Is it Singapore who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister, or is it the PAP (the ruling People’s Action Party) who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister?” Asst Prof Walid asked.

While Mr Heng noted that many among the 700 students who attended the ministerial forum organised by the NTU Students’ Union were happy to have a prime minister who is not Chinese, he said that this was not the case for all of Singapore.

“My own experience in walking the ground, in working with different people from all walks of life, is that the views — if you go by age and by life experience — would be very different,” the finance minister said.

Nevertheless, Mr Heng said: "I do think that at the right time, when enough people think that we may have a minority leader, a minority who becomes the leader of the country, that is something that we can all hope for."

He also noted that it was a good sign that young people today seem “quite comfortable” with having a non-Chinese prime minister as it showed that the Government’s emphasis on standing united as one people “regardless of race, language or religion” had borne fruit.

Asst Prof Walid also asked if the Government was sending out contradictory messages by reserving the 2017 Presidential Election for candidates from the Malay community while stating that Singapore is not ready for a prime minister from a minority race.

Mr Heng stressed that it was “not contradictory”. “It is precisely because we need to place this emphasis institutionally that we recognise that we have not arrived. It is important for us to ensure that we have that safeguard.”

Pointing to what he witnessed when he took part in elections as “an observer” and not a candidate, he added: “I can tell you that it is not easy because it triggers all the feelings about race, which are not obvious. But when it comes to an election, it becomes an issue.”

At Thursday’s forum, Mr Heng was also asked a range of questions across different topics, including the future of jobs and Singapore’s foreign policy.

An accountancy student asked if Singapore would follow the path indicated by the 2013 Population White Paper, which projected a population of up to 6.9 million here by 2030.

Mr Heng said Singaporeans understand that rationally, the country needs more people as its workforce is declining, but “emotionally, we don’t feel comfortable”.

He also noted that openness and multiculturalism are important aspects to why Singapore is commemorating this year the 200th anniversary of the arrival of Sir Stamford Raffles.

“The more open we are, the more international we are in our outlook, the better it is for Singapore (and) the world. Because you don’t want a world where people build walls around themselves,” Mr Heng added.
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...reans-not-ready-non-chinese-pm-heng-swee-keat
 
We were all colour-blind. Until the pap started the GRC, HDB blocks race quota, reserve Presidency, PM must be chinese. The pap taught us about racism, they made us racists.

And sinkies being daft : monkey see, monkey do lah.
 
We were all colour-blind. Until the pap started the GRC, HDB blocks race quota, reserve Presidency, PM must be chinese. The pap taught us about racism, they made us racists.

And sinkies being daft : monkey see, monkey do lah.

We were all colour blind until vile oppie Tang Liang Hong made public his chink chauvinism ways. PAP nearly lost the battle against that racist in Cheng San years ago. You must have forgotten about that.
 
We were all colour blind until vile oppie Tang Liang Hong made public his chink chauvinism ways. PAP nearly lost the battle against that racist in Cheng San years ago. You must have forgotten about that.

LKY turn racist started this Chinese chauvinist rethoric....

Then turn more racist against Indian JBJ...

Then his jiakleowbee nepotism son turn racist against Malay where an Indian is a Malay.... to prove that Malay are not capable, stupid, lazy, and cunning....

Backfired yr rethoric...
 
LKY turn racist started this Chinese chauvinist rethoric....

Then turn more racist against Indian JBJ...

Then his jiakleowbee nepotism son turn racist against Malay where an Indian is a Malay....

Backfired yr rethoric...

How could Ah Gong be racist? He was the founder of multiracial Singapore!
 
Both a jiuhu kia.... come steal jobs from locals...

Sinkie males so balless afraid of PAP, dare not revolt against NSF, CPF, GRC....

So how can he be Sinkie males....

Our Sinkie male PM is balless to face live questioning time TV.... must read script type leader.... jiuhu kia or HK kian and the other is no NSF kia blackie...
 
To prove that Singapore is not racist, the PAP should field Dave Parkash as a candidate in a SMC in the next election. They should also suggest that someone like Dave Parkash should be able to become the Prime Minister of Singapore.

Oh wait..... I guess the older generation of Singaporeans is still racist. Open admission by DPM.
Thats why malays must work harder to convert as many chinese girls to adopt their culture.
How could Ah Gong be racist? He was the founder of multiracial Singapore!
The founder of multiracial singapore were the malays who never compalined when hordes of filthy despicable uncouth immigrants came in by the millioms.
 
The founder of multiracial singapore were the malays who never compalined when hordes of filthy despicable uncouth immigrants came in by the millioms.

It's on record that our founding father was Ah Gong, not m&d villagers.
 
We were all colour-blind. Until the pap started the GRC, HDB blocks race quota, reserve Presidency, PM must be chinese. The pap taught us about racism, they made us racists.

And sinkies being daft : monkey see, monkey do lah.
I agree with you with some additional points, we have reached almost boiling point when garment let in hundreds of thousands of arrogant CECA faked talents took away our local PMET jobs, and close both eyes when they terrorise our local citizen.
 
How could Ah Gong be racist? He was the founder of multiracial Singapore!
Yes, he also created an albinese in his own home with his Gene based sexperiment. White Rabbits Matter
 
We were all colour blind until vile oppie Tang Liang Hong made public his chink chauvinism ways. PAP nearly lost the battle against that racist in Cheng San years ago. You must have forgotten about that.
History is written by the victors.
 
This shitskin is a poor mongrel breed.

India mix with Pinay, this kind of pariah dog should be shot fresh out from the cunt.
 
We were all colour blind until vile oppie Tang Liang Hong made public his chink chauvinism ways. PAP nearly lost the battle against that racist in Cheng San years ago. You must have forgotten about that.
By swapping the ballot boxes.
 
We were all colour-blind. Until the pap started the GRC, HDB blocks race quota, reserve Presidency, PM must be chinese. The pap taught us about racism, they made us racists.

And sinkies being daft : monkey see, monkey do lah.

K L N

If AhMeng dont see & do,
then, I worlee.
 
By swapping the ballot boxes.

There were enough polling agents and grassroots leaders on duty during each elections to ensure that oppies aren't allowed to stuff the ballot boxes or swap the ballot boxes.
 
Speak Mandarin campaign. MHA not a single commissioner a Malay. PM must be a cheena. Meritocracy my foot!
 
There were enough polling agents and grassroots leaders on duty during each elections to ensure that oppies aren't allowed to stuff the ballot boxes or swap the ballot boxes.
You must have forgotten the NS motto, Can do anything, just dont get caught.
When the people who are supposed to do the 'catching' refuses to 'catch', then you can do anything.
 
Back
Top