if the wider Middle Eastern North African Central Asian region had any semicompetent civilization, they'd be able to pull this off
you need to know their psyche.
for most middle easterners, they have been enslaved, ruled, conquered, by ang mohs europeans for thousands of years
for them, losing to ang mohs come naturally
to them, it is expected that they will serve ang mohs, copy ang mohs, get killed by ang mohs, mocked, treated like animals, conquered, enslaved, and what not.
greeks al iskander conquered egypt, turkey/anatolia, persia, iraq, syria, all the way to paki, afghan and cecapura.
afterwards, this was the map of the roman empire
this was ottoman empire at peak where their "sultans" (title derived from arabic) copy-pasted european/roman titles and concepts
as we can see, more than 1000 years after romans, the ottomans could conquer only a fraction of the regions conquered by the Romans.
despite fashioning themselves after (kafir) Romans, and with the added benefit of hindsight and tremendous accumulated knowledge experience and expertise worldwide, donkey turks could only capture those parts of the roman empire that go on to become sh*tholes
all the "juicy" rich developed areas of today, in europe, like poms france italy spain belgium parts of germany etc remained outside ottoman control - for its entire history.
the summary: these regions of middle east north africa central asia are inferior to europeans
racially
genetically
as a civilization
at fighting wars
in intellect
in organizational skills
in talent
and what have you
and internally, middle easterners including turks and iranians accept these facts
whether they put up a brave face in public like iraq saddam or iran or turkey or not
in contrast, whether you talk of muslims or hindus (two biggest and most important communities) in south asia,
none of them were ruled
conquered
enslaved
battered
bruised
psychologically brainwashed
mocked
dismissed
steamrolled
and enslaved again
and again
and again
for thousands of years
at worst
pommie rule over south asia lasted a mere 200 years
there is inherent belief among Muslims in South Asia, that pommie rule in South Asia occurred because of
1. betrayal/treachery of Hindus - the erstwhile enslaved/conquered/ruled community
2. industrialization - which is a recent phenomenon when you look at 8000-10,000 years of history worldwide of all civilizations.
industrialization gave a leg up to first movers, they could dominate much more populous much bigger much distant countries with ease
once that edge erodes, we see no novel revolution or revolutionary thought or idea
all we see is slight or minor tweaks here there
and as a result we see biggest most populous countries slowly gradually returning to become most powerful and geopolitically significant players
for hindus, the majority community of south asia, they harbour a grudge and inferiority complex.
as their saffron terrorist PM said, 1200 years of slave mentality troubles CECA saffron terrorists
on one hand, 1000 years of Muslim rule civilized them (to some extent, partially)
brought them some riches
some fame
some advancement
on other hand, CECA with their inherent caste system belief can't wrap their heads around this concept
how could non-caste system non discriminatory system of Islamic rule be right just fair and superior to their system or their warring caste kingdoms?
for CECA, the belief is while ang mohs enslaved them for 200 years as well, ang mohs at least gave them a big unified country with world's second biggest population (more than africa) and left lots of infrastructure (like railways post office telegram etc) civil service stock exchange one of first steel mills etc for CECA as well, while dividing wider Middle East North Africa, South Asia Central Asia and Muslim world.
so for CECA, they see ang moh as the most supreme novel caste, superior to their brahmins
but they see Muslims as their tormentors and rulers and conquerers who did a lot of good for them but somehow CECA can't tolerate that they were enslaved for 1200 years.
contradiction is they are OK with 200 years of slavery thanks to ang moh pommies
the above summary explains why things happen the way they do
when looking at m&ds (brunei malaysia indon pinoy thai viets cambodia myanmar ASEAN) whether muslim or nonmuslim, first of all, their muslims are not really Islamic or never were Islamic.
second, ASEAN never had any civilization still today can't deliver any great thinker intellectual businessman tycoon tech giant philospher artist sportsman or any novel revolutionary concept or achievement in any discipline
got no geopolitical power or influence
got no military might
no nukes
no ASAT weapons
no icbm
no ssbn
no ssgn
no slbm
no aircraft carriers
nothing worth mentioning
it explains why different peoples in different regions react differently
why they perform differently
why some talk only no action
while some do take action but fail a lot
while some others take action, talk a lot less
and why some are OK with western enslavement
since their history tells them they have been enslaved by european ang mohs
well before industrialization
and well before many of them were enlightened thanks to the eternal magnificent superior teachings of Islam
and how they have repeatedly lost wars and got conquered by other superior races, before industrialization and after industrialization occured in ang moh UK, and how they lost wars and got conquered before the beautiful magnificent eternal just and all conquering message of Islam was finally revealed, and afterwards as well.
heck the losers not only lost to ang mohs, before industrialization as well (so ang mohs industrialized first is no excuse for thsoe loser anatolians arabs persians central asians)
they lost after ang mohs industrialized first in UK as well.
losers = always losers
this explains their misery
inferior genes
they dont mind such outcomes
they know they are an inferior breed
you don't expect both a cat and a lion to be treated as kings of the jungle
just coz they are both from same feline or felidae family or whatever
