Serious AG Lucien Wong Orders Police To Investigate Oppies And Samsters For Saying Chinks Get Lighter Sentences For Slaughtering Ah Bengs!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
1602856872904.png


SINGAPORE: The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) on Friday (Oct 16) refuted allegations made on social media that the individuals involved in the case of a death at Orchard Towers received preferential treatment in sentencing because of their race.

The AGC has directed the police to investigate those responsible for the social media posts that "are potentially in contempt of court".


“The Attorney-General’s Chambers is aware of social media posts alleging preferential treatment of accused persons involved in the death of 31-year-old Satheesh Noel s/o Gobidass at Orchard Towers on Jul 2, 2019, based on their race,” the AGC said in a media statement.


“Any allegation that the Court imposes sentences on offenders on account of their race, and imposes harsher sentences if they are a member of a minority race, is categorically false and baseless.”

SEVEN INDIVIDUALS INITIALLY CHARGED WITH MURDER

Of the seven people initially charged with the murder of Mr Satheesh, six have had their charges reduced.


Two people initially charged with murder were dealt with in court on reduced charges in the past week, one receiving a five-month jail sentence and another receiving a conditional warning.


Chan Jia Xing was given a conditional warning on Thursday for a reduced charge of consorting with a person possessing an offensive weapon.

The sole woman in the case, Natalie Siow Yu Zhen, was sentenced to five months' jail on Oct 9. She pleaded guilty to one charge each of voluntarily causing hurt with common intention and of consorting with a person possessing an offensive weapon.

In March, co-accused Joel Tan Yun Sheng received four weeks' jail for voluntarily causing hurt with common intention.

Ang Da Yuan was given eight months' jail and six strokes of the cane for voluntarily causing hurt to the victim by kicking and punching him, and to consorting with Tan Sen Yang, the only accused left facing a murder charge.

Tan Hong Sheng and Loo Boon Chong have also had their charges reduced, from murder to consorting with a person carrying an offensive weapon. Their cases are still pending.

The AGC said that the six individuals had their charges reduced because they “were found not to be involved in causing the death of the deceased”.

“At no point did the Police and AGC take the race of the deceased and the seven individuals into consideration in its decision,” it said.

The AGC also said that the sentences handed to Joel Tan, Siow and Ang were in line with sentencing guidelines for their charges, while Chan only received a warning because “he tried to stop the attack on the deceased” and has cooperated with police investigations.

Chan may still face his consorting charge should he commit a crime during his 12-month warning period.

“Allegations of preferential treatment for different races are baseless and have the potential to disrupt racial harmony in Singapore, causing irreversible divisions in our communities,” the statement concluded.

“AGC will not hesitate to take action against those who fall foul of the law.”

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...orchard-towers-murder-contempt-court-13291562
 
Yes, investigate someone for having an opinion. :rolleyes:
 
AGC should just publish that those social media posts are ridiculous and not true, and that the law is fair and impartial. That's it! Why must get polis involved? Our polis is very free izzit? Trying to reinforce the notion that sinkieland is a police state?
 
AGC should just publish that those social media posts are ridiculous and not true, and that the law is fair and impartial. That's it! Why must get polis involved? Our polis is very free izzit? Trying to reinforce the notion that sinkieland is a police state?

The police gets involved when oppies show their contempt towards our court.
 
The police gets involved when oppies show their contempt towards our court.
Like what laksaboy said, these are opinions. Albeit misplaced opinions. Just say it's not true. Why need to get their knickers in a twist?

And your blatant contempt for us oppies is not appreciated.:mad:
 
Like what laksaboy said, these are opinions. Albeit misplaced opinions. Just say it's not true. Why need to get their knickers in a twist?

And your blatant contempt for us oppies is not appreciated.:mad:

Since those opinions are not true, they must be brought to justice for besmirching the good reputation of our court.
 
If I said Ho Ching is a beautiful MILF, will AG send Mata to investigate me?
 
the comms department of agc and judiciary should be sacked

public opinion could all have been properly managed but their adherence to stupid no comments at early stages of this case caused expectations that all 6 are to be hanged for murder
 
I've just reported you to the authorities for calling our courts kangaroo courts.
KNN can my uncle ask the court why steal bread sentence is heavier than possessing weapon and involvement with killing :thumbsdown: KNN
 
View attachment 93424

SINGAPORE: The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) on Friday (Oct 16) refuted allegations made on social media that the individuals involved in the case of a death at Orchard Towers received preferential treatment in sentencing because of their race.

The AGC has directed the police to investigate those responsible for the social media posts that "are potentially in contempt of court".


“The Attorney-General’s Chambers is aware of social media posts alleging preferential treatment of accused persons involved in the death of 31-year-old Satheesh Noel s/o Gobidass at Orchard Towers on Jul 2, 2019, based on their race,” the AGC said in a media statement.


“Any allegation that the Court imposes sentences on offenders on account of their race, and imposes harsher sentences if they are a member of a minority race, is categorically false and baseless.”

SEVEN INDIVIDUALS INITIALLY CHARGED WITH MURDER

Of the seven people initially charged with the murder of Mr Satheesh, six have had their charges reduced.


Two people initially charged with murder were dealt with in court on reduced charges in the past week, one receiving a five-month jail sentence and another receiving a conditional warning.


Chan Jia Xing was given a conditional warning on Thursday for a reduced charge of consorting with a person possessing an offensive weapon.

The sole woman in the case, Natalie Siow Yu Zhen, was sentenced to five months' jail on Oct 9. She pleaded guilty to one charge each of voluntarily causing hurt with common intention and of consorting with a person possessing an offensive weapon.

In March, co-accused Joel Tan Yun Sheng received four weeks' jail for voluntarily causing hurt with common intention.

Ang Da Yuan was given eight months' jail and six strokes of the cane for voluntarily causing hurt to the victim by kicking and punching him, and to consorting with Tan Sen Yang, the only accused left facing a murder charge.

Tan Hong Sheng and Loo Boon Chong have also had their charges reduced, from murder to consorting with a person carrying an offensive weapon. Their cases are still pending.

The AGC said that the six individuals had their charges reduced because they “were found not to be involved in causing the death of the deceased”.

“At no point did the Police and AGC take the race of the deceased and the seven individuals into consideration in its decision,” it said.

The AGC also said that the sentences handed to Joel Tan, Siow and Ang were in line with sentencing guidelines for their charges, while Chan only received a warning because “he tried to stop the attack on the deceased” and has cooperated with police investigations.

Chan may still face his consorting charge should he commit a crime during his 12-month warning period.

“Allegations of preferential treatment for different races are baseless and have the potential to disrupt racial harmony in Singapore, causing irreversible divisions in our communities,” the statement concluded.

“AGC will not hesitate to take action against those who fall foul of the law.”

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...orchard-towers-murder-contempt-court-13291562
KNN my uncle think they are stoopid to say is due to race KNN my uncle rethink and leelised the actual leeson for light sentence is becas the victim was someone the court think better be dead KNN therefore 为民除害 sentence should be leeduced KNN
 
Back
Top