• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tiwary may go free

TeeKee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
8,533
Points
0
The jury cannot be 100% certain if he's the murderer...even the case if flawed....with many unanswered questions...

SYDNEY: The jury in the trial of Singaporean Ram Tiwary has been urged to acquit him. Summing up, the defence on Friday accused police of failing to keep an open mind in their investigation of the murder of Tiwary's two flatmates six years ago.

It was September 2003 when the bodies of Tony Tan Poh Chuan and Tay Chow Lyang were found in their apartment, close to the University of New South Wales. Both had been clubbed to death with a baseball bat.

News of the horrific murders shocked fellow students at the university, which is attended by thousands of overseas students, many of them from Asia.

Six months later, Ram Tiwary, who was on a scholarship from the Singapore army, was charged with their murder. Although he was later convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment, he won an appeal.

The re-trial, which began about four weeks ago at the New South Wales Supreme Court, heard how Tiwary, who is now 30, had told police he was asleep in the flat at the time of the murders.

But his story was at odds with the account he gave his friends who were told he came home to find the blood-soaked bodies of his two flatmates.

The defendant explained that he had lied because he was too ashamed to admit he had not gone to the aid of his dead friends. He also claimed the blood that was found on his feet and clothing must have got there when he checked Tan's pulse and the victim coughed up blood.

Crown Prosecutor John Kiely said Tiwary had the motive, the opportunity and the capacity to kill the two men. He was badly behind with his rent and his student life was falling apart.

But there were also claims that there had been a litany of mistakes in the police investigation.

The judge is expected to begin his summing up on Monday. Tiwary's family members, who have spent much of the past month in Sydney supporting him, should find out next week whether he will walk free or spend much of the rest of his life behind bars.


- CNA
 
That's why MM Lee is smart. He abolished the jury system. One man can think better than 10 confusing minds.
 
SYDNEY: The jury in the trial of Singaporean Ram Tiwary has been urged to acquit him. Summing up, the defence on Friday accused police of failing to keep an open mind in their investigation of the murder of Tiwary's two flatmates six years ago.


So this means nothing other than racial profiling? Anyway, we believe Ran Tiwary is innocent. Let him go.
 
No lah!

One person easier to bribe and control than 10.

That is a perfect description of former Justice Lai Kew Chai. He served his master (old man Lee) very well. Just like a faithful dog on the Bench.
 
That is a perfect description of former Justice Lai Kew Chai. He served his master (old man Lee) very well. Just like a faithful dog on the Bench.

and all the spawns...like the famous 'kangaroo picture judge'..( sorry your HONOUR, there are no Kangaroos in court, only in the zoo):p
 
No lah!

That was the story I came up with. I have to come up with something.:eek:

Jury panel so many people, keep changing some more with each case.

How to bribe and control?

Doggie judge better, you see or not? So simple logic also cannot understand?

Not something highfalutin here.:D


How come 10 minds become confused? One mind very clear meh?
 
In the Western world, if you have money to hire a good attorney, he will be able to get you out regardless of the kind of shit you may be in. Its the poor who can't afford costly legal fees suffer.
 
Let's just say with a jury and a very persuasive highly-paid defence attorney, the chances of him being found not guilty is very high. In Singapore, he'll be languishing in death row and perhaps hanged by now.
 
Let's just say with a jury and a very persuasive highly-paid defence attorney, the chances of him being found not guilty is very high. In Singapore, he'll be languishing in death row and perhaps hanged by now.
Well, if he's acquitted, he'll be coming back to SG, won't he?
 
In the Western world, if you have money to hire a good attorney, he will be able to get you out regardless of the kind of shit you may be in. Its the poor who can't afford costly legal fees suffer.

the strange thing is that, even though the guilty one may go free first, but later still ended up in jail...like OJ..Simpson...:D

who say there's no God? :D
 
the strange thing is that, even though the guilty one may go free first, but later still ended up in jail...like OJ..Simpson...:D

who say there's no God? :D

But if he were to disappear into places India or Bangladesh once he is freed. I think it would be very hard for the Australian authorities to find him if they decide to charge him again.
 
But if he were to disappear into places India or Bangladesh once he is freed. I think it would be very hard for the Australian authorities to find him if they decide to charge him again.

I would rather stay in Australian prison than go to those countries
 
I would rather stay in Australian prison than go to those countries

Well I don't know what the Aussie prisons are like,.. all's I know is,
if you let a snake into your home, ultimately some one is going to get bitten. :cool:
 
Back
Top