• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat NCMPs can help ensure no blank cheque for PAP: Cotton Chan

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
NCMPs can help ensure no blank cheque for PAP: Chan


The People's Action Party (PAP) will never have a blank cheque to do as it wishes because it is accountable to Singaporeans, two ministers said yesterday.

The country's Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) scheme also guarantees that Parliament will have a diversity of views and opposing voices, regardless of whether opposition members are elected, they added.

Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Indranee Rajah were responding to Workers' Party (WP) candidate Jamus Lim, who had called on Singaporeans to vote for the WP and deny the PAP "a blank cheque" during a televised debate on Wednesday.

Mr Chan said this is not a "correct characterisation" of what the General Election is about, as the PAP is accountable to the electorate and responsible for the people's welfare.

"I don't think there is anything such as a blank cheque as if the PAP can do anything without accountability," he said.

"Everything that we do, at every step of the way, we have to be responsible to Singaporeans, their welfare, their well-being and we have to be responsible for the long-term survival of the country."


Mr Chan was speaking on the sidelines of a walkabout at Pek Kio Market, where he was joined by his Tanjong Pagar GRC teammates, Ms Indranee and PAP new faces Alvin Tan and Eric Chua.

During the Wednesday debate, Associate Professor Lim, who is in the WP's Sengkang GRC team, said: "The PAP has argued that the election is really about giving them a mandate to bring the country out of this crisis and they need this mandate in order to do so.

"The truth is the PAP in all likelihood will have this mandate by the end of this election... what we are trying to deny the PAP isn't a mandate, what we are trying to deny them is a blank cheque."

In her rebuttal, Ms Indranee pointed to the NCMP scheme: "The PAP will never have a blank cheque, because no matter what happens, the Constitution guarantees at least 12 opposition seats."

She said NCMPs have equal voting rights as elected MPs, and can vote on parliamentary matters such as constitutional amendments, supply and money Bills and vote of confidence.

The NCMP scheme was introduced in 1984 to ensure a minimum number of opposition Members in Parliament. NCMP seats are offered to losing opposition candidates who get the highest percentage of votes.

In 2016, the Constitution was amended to give NCMPs expanded rights and to increase the number of opposition MPs from nine to 12.

These 12 seats can comprise any combination of elected MPs or NCMPs. If there are 12 or more elected opposition MPs, there will be no NCMP seats.

Mr Chan said the NCMP scheme has institutionalised diversity of views in Parliament.

"We designed it as such because we want to make sure any discussion about the future of the country and the policies that we are going to implement are done robustly," he said.

However, Progress Singapore Party (PSP) chief Tan Cheng Bock has hit out at the expanded NCMP scheme as a ploy to entice voters to not vote for the opposition.

He said he would decline an NCMP seat if he was offered one, but other party members could take it up if they wished.

Dr Tan was speaking to reporters during a walkabout yesterday with PSP candidate Kayla Low at a market in Yio Chu Kang SMC.

"For NCMPs, while they try and improve the scheme, I look at it as a ploy this round to entice you all to vote the PAP because they guarantee you that they (will) have 12 NCMPs.

"But I think, if you really want a proper representative in the House, vote for the person to go into the House so he has the base. That is very important. If you have no base, it is very difficult to function as an MP. You cannot just be like a virtual MP, you must be a proper MP," he said.

Dr Tan, who is leading the PSP's A-team to contest in West Coast GRC, said an elected MP is connected to the people and has the responsibility to voters who elected him.

"These are the people you really have to represent on the ground, that makes you a very different MP because you can feel the ground, you know the ground (and) the issues that are brought up. You can speak with strength," he said.

But Dr Tan added that he would leave it to his team members to decide if they want to enter Parliament through the NCMP scheme, in the event that they are offered seats.
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
feel that NCMP scheme is wrong. they are defeated in election, they shouldn't be in parliament, it's that simple. but it's understandable why the Oppo choose to accept the NCMP seats, it's worse being shut out from parliament. TCB now understand the Oppo NCMP dilemma. NCMP now has same voting rights as constituency MP, what about the pay ?
 

zeddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This bastard clown can fool the 70% but he can't fool us. The PAP has been treating this island as their private fiefdom for decades. The creation of the NCMP is just a total sham on the part of the PAP to dupe guillible daft Sinkies. But will daft Sinkies ever learn?
 

searcher1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let the PAP fill up the NCMP seats, the rest can be shared among the different opposition parties.
Since it is no difference according to PAP
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
y dey so keen on having ncmp but not peasants elected mp's? ...

dey r scared of losing ...

ncmp r nutting 2 dem ... dey haf all seats ... u can tok wat u like ... but dey do wat dey want ...

wen dey lose seats, dey lose face ... their loss is real, their fear is real ...
 

spotter542

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Fucking shortie ran out of ideas how to counter Dr. Chee
This is what happens when you flood cabinet with Yes-men and Paper Generals :FU:
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
I am calling his bluff.

PAP will win with a supermajority. Sinkies be brave! Vote opposition!
 

birdie69

Alfrescian
Loyal
NCMPs can help ensure no blank cheque for PAP: Chan


The People's Action Party (PAP) will never have a blank cheque to do as it wishes because it is accountable to Singaporeans, two ministers said yesterday.

The country's Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) scheme also guarantees that Parliament will have a diversity of views and opposing voices, regardless of whether opposition members are elected, they added.

Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Indranee Rajah were responding to Workers' Party (WP) candidate Jamus Lim, who had called on Singaporeans to vote for the WP and deny the PAP "a blank cheque" during a televised debate on Wednesday.

Mr Chan said this is not a "correct characterisation" of what the General Election is about, as the PAP is accountable to the electorate and responsible for the people's welfare.

"I don't think there is anything such as a blank cheque as if the PAP can do anything without accountability," he said.

"Everything that we do, at every step of the way, we have to be responsible to Singaporeans, their welfare, their well-being and we have to be responsible for the long-term survival of the country."


Mr Chan was speaking on the sidelines of a walkabout at Pek Kio Market, where he was joined by his Tanjong Pagar GRC teammates, Ms Indranee and PAP new faces Alvin Tan and Eric Chua.

During the Wednesday debate, Associate Professor Lim, who is in the WP's Sengkang GRC team, said: "The PAP has argued that the election is really about giving them a mandate to bring the country out of this crisis and they need this mandate in order to do so.

"The truth is the PAP in all likelihood will have this mandate by the end of this election... what we are trying to deny the PAP isn't a mandate, what we are trying to deny them is a blank cheque."

In her rebuttal, Ms Indranee pointed to the NCMP scheme: "The PAP will never have a blank cheque, because no matter what happens, the Constitution guarantees at least 12 opposition seats."

She said NCMPs have equal voting rights as elected MPs, and can vote on parliamentary matters such as constitutional amendments, supply and money Bills and vote of confidence.

The NCMP scheme was introduced in 1984 to ensure a minimum number of opposition Members in Parliament. NCMP seats are offered to losing opposition candidates who get the highest percentage of votes.

In 2016, the Constitution was amended to give NCMPs expanded rights and to increase the number of opposition MPs from nine to 12.

These 12 seats can comprise any combination of elected MPs or NCMPs. If there are 12 or more elected opposition MPs, there will be no NCMP seats.

Mr Chan said the NCMP scheme has institutionalised diversity of views in Parliament.

"We designed it as such because we want to make sure any discussion about the future of the country and the policies that we are going to implement are done robustly," he said.

However, Progress Singapore Party (PSP) chief Tan Cheng Bock has hit out at the expanded NCMP scheme as a ploy to entice voters to not vote for the opposition.

He said he would decline an NCMP seat if he was offered one, but other party members could take it up if they wished.

Dr Tan was speaking to reporters during a walkabout yesterday with PSP candidate Kayla Low at a market in Yio Chu Kang SMC.

"For NCMPs, while they try and improve the scheme, I look at it as a ploy this round to entice you all to vote the PAP because they guarantee you that they (will) have 12 NCMPs.

"But I think, if you really want a proper representative in the House, vote for the person to go into the House so he has the base. That is very important. If you have no base, it is very difficult to function as an MP. You cannot just be like a virtual MP, you must be a proper MP," he said.

Dr Tan, who is leading the PSP's A-team to contest in West Coast GRC, said an elected MP is connected to the people and has the responsibility to voters who elected him.

"These are the people you really have to represent on the ground, that makes you a very different MP because you can feel the ground, you know the ground (and) the issues that are brought up. You can speak with strength," he said.

But Dr Tan added that he would leave it to his team members to decide if they want to enter Parliament through the NCMP scheme, in the event that they are offered seats.
CCS strongly believes that all Singaporean are idiot, as what he claimed in the leaked audio tape.
Will Singaporean stand up and prove to him that we are not idiot on 10 July?
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
only best oppo losers can get ncmp. if you like your constituency oppo candidate but don't vote for him. he would not get the ncmp seat.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
CCS said that PAP will be ready to pay the political price of the EP right?

Supporters of the late Ong T.C, let your votes be heard!
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
An elected MP is from the people, elected by the people and for the people.

A nominated MP is from the gahmen, selected by the gahmen to speak for the gahmen.

The word nominated is key. Imho these nmps are nominated to put up a PAP show of diversity of ideas and debate.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
NCMP scheme is for the best losers in the GE to take up seats in the Parliament.

NCMP and NMP have no voting rights in the past, now it seems NCMP will have voting rights.
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
The NCMP scheme is a "ploy" to undermine the democratic process so says TCB and a "poison chalice" says WP.


Allowances Not Bad though , got Medical Benefits also ,

MPs are paid an allowance for the time and expenses incurred in serving in that capacity. Our MPs serve dual roles – they have a community-based role, i.e. looking after the needs of their constituents and raising their concerns in Parliament, and also a legislative role in Parliament where they can influence decisions on Government budgets, and enact or amend legislation, including the Constitution.

As MPs play a political role, their allowance should be pegged to that of the political appointment holders. But since MPs do not have an executive role, MPs are given only a monthly allowance, a 13th month bonus and AVC. Hence, an MP’s annual allowance is 17.5% of the MR4 benchmark, i.e. a drop of 3% from the 2010 allowance. The annual MP allowance is $192,500.

Prior to 21 May 2011, only MPs elected before 1995 were eligible for pension. However, just like the political appointment holders, the pensions of these MPs have been frozen as at 20 May 2011. They will receive the frozen pension when they step down from their MP positions.

NCMPs and NMPs have smaller roles than MPs. They do not have a community role as they do not have constituents. Hence the annual allowance of an NCMP / NMP is pegged to 15% of the MP’s annual allowance. An NCMP/NMP’s annual allowance is $28,900, which is a drop of about 4% from the 2010 allowance.

MPs are on the Medisave-cum-Subsidised Outpatient (MSO) scheme. There are no other perks.
 
Top