Case 144 : JURONG Hairdresser who had attended to customers

glocky

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
656
Points
43
bAEuJXh.png


Huat or not? :D
 
Jurong is fast becoming a Covider Township!
Huat ah!!!
 
Another PAP grassroot member...huat ah!
 
I think the entire Jurong (West?) should be condemned.
 
Jurong Steam Steam liao!

Case 129 (Announced on 6 March)

40. Case 129 is a 68 year-old female Singapore Citizen who has no recent travel history to affected countries and regions. She is currently warded in an isolation room at NTFGH. She is a family member of Case 130, and is linked to the cluster involving the private dinner function at SAFRA Jurong.

41. She reported onset of symptoms on 2 March and had sought treatment at Pioneer Polyclinic. She presented at NTFGH on 2 March and 4 March. Subsequent test results confirmed COVID-19 infection on 6 March morning.

42. Prior to hospital admission, she had visited a shop at 966 Jurong West Street 91. She works at Jurong Port Road Food Centre (29A Jurong Port Road) as a food handler, but had not been at work since onset of symptoms. She stays at Jurong West Street 71.

Case 130 (Announced on 6 March)

43. Case 130 is a 66 year-old male Singapore Citizen who has no recent travel history to affected countries and regions. He is currently warded in an isolation room at NTFGH. He is a family member of Case 129, and is linked to the cluster involving the private dinner function at SAFRA Jurong.

44. He reported onset of symptoms on 24 February and had sought treatment at a GP clinic on the same day, and on 29 February and 1 March. He presented at NTFGH on 4 March. Subsequent test results confirmed COVID-19 infection on 6 March morning.

45. Prior to hospital admission, he had gone to work at Jurong Port Road Food Centre as a food handler, and visited Bukit Batok Community Club (21 Bukit Batok Central). He stays at Jurong West Street 71.
 
Looks like JEM, Westgate and all those area around NTFGH are "dangerous' places to be at.
 
Back
Top