Will the PAP form a new "Opposition Party" with candidates in the LTK mould?

FuckSamLeong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
1,837
Points
0
Too far fetched? Is it not a plausible solution, cynically speaking, given the fact that the PAP can no longer deceive the peasants with the business as usual air of confidence?
 
Too far fetched? Is it not a plausible solution, cynically speaking, given the fact that the PAP can no longer deceive the peasants with the business as usual air of confidence?

good of you to reveal your true colours so soon...
 
Too far fetched? Is it not a plausible solution, cynically speaking, given the fact that the PAP can no longer deceive the peasants with the business as usual air of confidence?[/quote]

I am certain that is indeed their second line of defense. Create phooney oppositions and play good cop & bad cop role..First PAP created an illusion that PAP MP(s) themselves can fill the role of opposition with opposing views.The pretty face PAP MP & and a baboo singh PAP MP is one such example..and yet the singh is also wip for the PAP !.

Than the NMP scandal...Viswa & Walter Woon are examples.Lots of talk but the momment the fatso became an attorney-general; when his master orders 'jump' !--he asks how high massa.

Than the likes of LTK ,Sylvia Lim and etc.It is also highly plausible PAP 3rd line of defence could also be a planned split within PAP--creation of another wayang.

But as the saying goes,''man proposes and god dispose
s''--
 
This is the first time inference is ever directed at me as being pro establishment. Guess you are not acquainted with my erstwhile nics.

i call it as i see it. anyone can cultivate an 'image' of a nic to serve their own agendas.

pls feel free to place me on your ignore list.
 
Did I ever mention that my loyalty is dirt cheap?

That I can't resist money dangled at me?

That I can be intellectually dishonest to the point of being greedy?


:oIo::oIo::oIo:



Too far fetched? Is it not a plausible solution, cynically speaking, given the fact that the PAP can no longer deceive the peasants with the business as usual air of confidence?[/quote]

I am certain that is indeed their second line of defense. Create phooney oppositions and play good cop & bad cop role..First PAP created an illusion that PAP MP(s) themselves can fill the role of opposition with opposing views.The pretty face PAP MP & and a baboo singh PAP MP is one such example..and yet the singh is also wip for the PAP !.

Than the NMP scandal...Viswa & Walter Woon are examples.Lots of talk but the momment the fatso became an attorney-general; when his master orders 'jump' !--he asks how high massa.

Than the likes of LTK ,Sylvia Lim and etc.It is also highly plausible PAP 3rd line of defence could also be a planned split within PAP--creation of another wayang.

But as the saying goes,''man proposes and god dispose
s''--
 
Back
Top