Chinese students iq tops

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
86,475
Points
113
But nobody wants to hire them. They will steal your IP, become spies, sexually abuse female colleagues....
Lifestyle & Culture
Mainland Chinese students best in world as Singapore, Hong Kong slip down rankings
  • The results of the latest Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) survey were announced on Tuesday
  • It found 15-year-olds from Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang outperformed those from 78 other education systems
Dewey Sim
Dewey Sim

Published: 4:00pm, 3 Dec, 2019


12

Students attend class at a school in Hefei, capital of east China's Anhui province. Photo: Xinhua

Students attend class at a school in Hefei, capital of east China's Anhui province. Photo: Xinhua
Students from mainland
China
have edged out those from
Singapore
to take the top spot in a global benchmarking test, according to results announced on Tuesday.
The latest edition of the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) survey, conducted last year, assessed the performance of 15-year-olds from 79 education systems around the world in science, mathematics and reading.
Is corporal punishment acceptable in Chinese schools?
Students from the four participating cities in mainland China – Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang – came first in all three categories, with 590 points in science, 591 points in mathematics, and 555 points in reading.

Advertisement

Those from the Lion City, meanwhile, scored 551, 569 and 549, respectively, taking second place.
In the last survey, conducted in 2015, they came first
.

A graphic showing the 2018 Pisa score of 11 different education systems

A graphic showing the 2018 Pisa score of 11 different education systems
The mean scores for all students that took part in the triennial assessment by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) were 489 points in science, 489 in maths and 487 in reading. Between 4,000 and 8,000 students from each education system were assessed.

In this year’s edition,
Hong Kong
– where 6,037 students from 152 schools were randomly selected for the assessment – was also nudged down in the charts, ranking fourth in mathematics and reading, and ninth in science.
American
students, meanwhile, placed 13th in reading, 37th in mathematics, and 18th

Angel Gurria, secretary general of the OECD, wrote in the opening remarks of the report that mainland Chinese students have “outperformed by a large margin” their peers from other countries, particularly in mathematics and science.
He noted, however, that the four cities whose students were assessed did not represent “China as a whole”, but that their sizes and make-up were comparable to a typical OECD country.
 
Ozland even worse than singkieland...singkieland bestest. And ozland slipping must b due to increase immigration from shithole cuntries. No wonder ozland is going down the dumps

Skip to main content
NEWS
SearchMore from ABC

News Ticker
NEWS HOME
Australian students behind in maths, reading and science, PISA education study shows
BY NATIONAL EDUCATION REPORTER CONOR DUFFY AND THE SPECIALIST REPORTING TEAM'S BROOKE WYLIEUPDATED ABOUT 2 HOURS AGO
Email Facebook Twitter WhatsApp
Sarah Matthews in the classroom
PHOTO
Sarah Matthews, who changed careers to teach maths, said the results were "disheartening".
ABC NEWS: JORDAN FONTALVO
A global study of more than half a million 15-year-olds has found Australian students lag 3.5 years behind their Chinese counterparts in maths — and their performance in all three major subjects is in long-term decline.
Key points:
  • The study assesses 600,000 15-year-olds from 79 countries every three years, comparing maths, reading and science performance
  • In Australia, 740 schools and more than 14,000 students were assessed
  • The study found Australian students' reading, science and maths results were all in a long-term decline
The 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) report, out today, found Australian students sat just slightly above the OECD average in maths literacy — its lowest level since the survey began.
The students' scores for science also plummeted to their lowest level ever.
As well as lagging well behind Chinese children in maths, the study also found Australian students had fallen more than a year behind their Singaporean counterparts in reading.
PISA national project manager Sue Thomson described the results as a "wake-up call".
"We're not giving them the skills that they need in maths or in reading or in science," she said.
"We're not giving them the same level of skills as they are in other countries.
"That is a concern, particularly in a global economy where our kids will compete with kids all over the world."
States falling behind
Across Australia the results were varied.
In reading, maths, and science, students in South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory fell below the OECD average for the first time.
The nation's capital was the best performer, with the ACT and Western Australia both beating the average.
New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland met the average.
Overall, the report found Australian students had fallen behind by a full school year in maths, and almost a school year in reading and science.
A graph showing Australia has been sliding backwards in the rankings since 2000

The Australian student performance was lower than China, Singapore, Estonia, Canada, Finland, Ireland, Korea and Poland.
It was on par with countries such as Sweden, New Zealand, the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, among others.
Results 'disheartening'
A decade ago, former academic Sarah Matthews saw firsthand what the PISA results are showing.
Realising students were developing anxiety about maths, she made a rare move to leave behind a university research career to begin frontline teaching.
She now runs a maths breakfast at Brisbane Bayside State College to help teachers and students lose their fear of maths.
"What I'm trying to do [is] make teachers and students believe and understand that maths is about creativity and problem solving," Dr Matthews said.

PHOTO Sarah Mathews gave up a career as an academic to focus on school teaching.
ABC NEWS: JORDAN FONTALVO

Dr Matthews has since won awards for helping students lift their maths results.
She described the PISA results as "disheartening".
"I think we need to think long and hard about what approach are we going to use to improve," she said.
"We obviously need to get kids thinking."
'Astounding' data exposes the myth of the 'education revolution'
'Astounding' data exposes the myth of the 'education revolution'

Thousands of public schools receive less public funding than similar private schools, an ABC News investigation has found.
Her year 8 student Josh Tolley said Dr Matthews's application of maths to real-world situations changed his mind about maths.
"She makes it not boring," he said.
Blame game
The results are expected to dominate next week's Education Council meeting in Alice Springs, which will see state ministers and education leaders discuss Australia-wide education strategies.
Speaking about the PISA report, federal Education Minister Dan Tehan said it should have "alarm bells ringing".
"The time has come for us to change direction," he said.
"My message to the state and territory education ministers is this: leave the teacher's union talking points at home and be ambitious."
Labor's Tanya Plibersek said Mr Tehan should take the blame.
"This should be a huge wake-up call for Scott Morrison and the Liberals who've seen school test scores plummet on their watch," she said.
POSTED ABOUT 3 HOURS AGO
SHARE
Email Facebook Twitter WhatsApp
 
song boh stinkies!

result of ah loong open leg policy to ceca ah neh virus.

Low IQ 81 Ah Neh CECA virus can only drag stinkypoor down the gutter. :biggrin:


Import more ceca virus

3ei82o.jpg
 
Unfortunately, chinese are low on emotionsl intelligence. This is where indian tops.

Open main menu
Wikipedia



Emotional intelligence


Emotional intelligence (EI), emotional leadership (EL), emotional quotient (EQ) and emotional intelligence quotient (EIQ), is the capability of individuals to recognize their own emotions and those of others, discern between different feelings and label them appropriately, use emotional information to guide thinking and behavior, and manage and/or adjust emotions to adapt to environments or achieve one's goal(s).[1][2]
Although the term first appeared in "The Communication of Emotional Meaning" paper by a member of Department of Psychology Teachers at College Columbia University Joel Robert Davitz and clinical professor of psychology in psychiatry Michael Beldoch[3] in 1964, it gained popularity in the 1995 book "Emotional Intelligence", written by author and science journalist Daniel Goleman.[4] Since this time, EI, and Goleman's 1995 analysis, have been criticized within the scientific community,[5] despite prolific reports of its usefulness in the popular press.[6][7][8][9]
Empathy is typically associated with EI, because it relates to an individual connecting their personal experiences with those of others. However, several models exist that aim to measure levels of (empathy) EI. There are currently several models of EI. Goleman's original model may now be considered a mixed model that combines what has since been modeled separately as ability EI and trait EI. Goleman defined EI as the array of skills and characteristics that drive leadership performance.[10] The trait model was developed by Konstantinos V. Petrides in 2001. It "encompasses behavioral dispositions and self perceived abilities and is measured through self report".[11] The ability model, developed by Peter Salovey and John Mayer in 2004, focuses on the individual's ability to process emotional information and use it to navigate the social environment.[12]
Studies have shown that people with high EI have greater mental health, job performance, and leadership skills although no causal relationships have been shown and such findings are likely to be attributable to general intelligence and specific personality traits rather than emotional intelligence as a construct. For example, Goleman indicated that EI accounted for 67% of the abilities deemed necessary for superior performance in leaders, and mattered twice as much as technical expertise or IQ.[13] Other research finds that the effect of EI markers on leadership and managerial performance is non-significant when ability and personality are controlled for,[14] and that general intelligence correlates very closely with leadership.[15] Markers of EI and methods of developing it have become more widely coveted in the past decade by individuals seeking to become more effective leaders. In addition, studies have begun to provide evidence to help characterize the neural mechanisms of emotional intelligence.[16][17][18][19]
Criticisms have centered on whether EI is a real intelligence and whether it has incremental validity over IQ and the Big Five personality traits.[20]
 
KNN is a fact Chinese top on every academic whenever they go KNN and they are smart enough to realise even you top on it you still need to work like a dog to earn money so they rather scam or be prostitute KNN
 
Unfortunately, chinese are low on emotionsl intelligence. This is where indian tops.

Open main menu
Wikipedia



Emotional intelligence


Emotional intelligence (EI), emotional leadership (EL), emotional quotient (EQ) and emotional intelligence quotient (EIQ), is the capability of individuals to recognize their own emotions and those of others, discern between different feelings and label them appropriately, use emotional information to guide thinking and behavior, and manage and/or adjust emotions to adapt to environments or achieve one's goal(s).[1][2]
Although the term first appeared in "The Communication of Emotional Meaning" paper by a member of Department of Psychology Teachers at College Columbia University Joel Robert Davitz and clinical professor of psychology in psychiatry Michael Beldoch[3] in 1964, it gained popularity in the 1995 book "Emotional Intelligence", written by author and science journalist Daniel Goleman.[4] Since this time, EI, and Goleman's 1995 analysis, have been criticized within the scientific community,[5] despite prolific reports of its usefulness in the popular press.[6][7][8][9]
Empathy is typically associated with EI, because it relates to an individual connecting their personal experiences with those of others. However, several models exist that aim to measure levels of (empathy) EI. There are currently several models of EI. Goleman's original model may now be considered a mixed model that combines what has since been modeled separately as ability EI and trait EI. Goleman defined EI as the array of skills and characteristics that drive leadership performance.[10] The trait model was developed by Konstantinos V. Petrides in 2001. It "encompasses behavioral dispositions and self perceived abilities and is measured through self report".[11] The ability model, developed by Peter Salovey and John Mayer in 2004, focuses on the individual's ability to process emotional information and use it to navigate the social environment.[12]
Studies have shown that people with high EI have greater mental health, job performance, and leadership skills although no causal relationships have been shown and such findings are likely to be attributable to general intelligence and specific personality traits rather than emotional intelligence as a construct. For example, Goleman indicated that EI accounted for 67% of the abilities deemed necessary for superior performance in leaders, and mattered twice as much as technical expertise or IQ.[13] Other research finds that the effect of EI markers on leadership and managerial performance is non-significant when ability and personality are controlled for,[14] and that general intelligence correlates very closely with leadership.[15] Markers of EI and methods of developing it have become more widely coveted in the past decade by individuals seeking to become more effective leaders. In addition, studies have begun to provide evidence to help characterize the neural mechanisms of emotional intelligence.[16][17][18][19]
Criticisms have centered on whether EI is a real intelligence and whether it has incremental validity over IQ and the Big Five personality traits.[20]
agree absolutely, anything that's emotional to male shitskins and pundeks are the stirring of the loins that leads to sexual crimes.
why, even holding their dicks in front of the urinal will lead to rape-urges - and as with the niggers, brain cells and intelligence are located in that hand-held piece of meat :redface:
 
Dun hve to question, just check the ratio of da population of China n S'pore! It's da same if u compared with India...so many smart people tat u felt u are being left behind in all sectors...hahahaha!
 
sinkies haf lost 2 prc ... sinkielan education muz haf gone down ze drains ...
 
Back
Top