[@GINFREELY] Have You Had Your HPV Vaccine?

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
26,183
Points
113
@ginfreely ...Though I think if you are already in late 40s, going 50s, the vaccine might not work. But the saving grace is you are a VIRGIN and hadn't had SEX before, so it might just work on you. It's best to be vaccinated before you become sexually active, according to my doctor's advice.

3 jabs in total over a period of a year. It's about $700!

I am serious...Please get yourself vaccinated. I don't want to lose a Virtual Playmate in Sammyboy Forum!

Lol :biggrin:

..................


'Every suggestion' HPV vaccine will cut cervical cancers
_107532123_hpvblur.jpg
Image copyright Getty Images

There is "every suggestion" HPV vaccination will lead to a fall in cervical cancers, say scientists who carried out a major review of evidence.

Most cervical cancer cases are linked to the human papilloma virus and vaccination began over a decade ago.

The Lancet review of 65 studies covering 60 million people over eight years showed a fall in HPV cases and in pre-cancerous growths.

Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust said the data should boost faith in the jab.

What is the human papilloma virus (HPV)?

_106287551_452346.png
Image copyright Getty
  • HPV is the name for a common group of viruses; there are more than 100 types of HPV
  • Many women will be infected with HPV over the course of their lifetime, with no ill effect
  • Most cervical cancers are caused by infection from a high-risk HPV
  • Others cause conditions including genital warts and cancers of the head and neck
  • The vaccine, given to girls aged 12 and 13 since 2008, protects against four types of HPV - 16 and 18, which are linked to more than 70% of cervical cancers - and six and 11, which cause about 90% of genital warts
Source: NHS Choices
There are 3,200 cases of cervical cancer and 850 deaths from the disease each year.

'Real-world' evidence

The review covered studies in 14 high-income countries, including the UK. They looked at HPV rates, plus cases of genital warts and pre-cancerous cells in the cervix called CIN.

It found that when rates were compared before vaccination started and eight years after:
  • Cases of HPV 16 and 18 were down 83% in girls aged 15-19 - 66% in women 20-24
  • Genital warts cases fell 67% in girls 15-19 - 54% in women 20-24
  • Pre-cancerous growths were down by 51% in girls 15-19 - 31% in women 20-24
It also showed people who were not vaccinated benefited. Cases of genital warts in men aged 15-19 fell by almost 50%, and also significantly in women over 30.

Rates fell more in countries where a wider age group was vaccinated and where coverage was higher.

Public Health England principal scientist Dr David Mesher said: "We are seeing reductions in HPV strains and in cervical disease as well, so there is every suggestion there will be reductions in cervical cancers too."

Prof Marc Brisson, from Laval University, Canada, who led the review, said: "We will see reductions in women aged 20-30 within the next 10 years."

He said cervical cancer elimination - defined as fewer than four cases per 100,000 - "might be possible if sufficiently high vaccination coverage can be achieved and maintained".

Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust said the findings "clearly showed" the impact of HPV vaccination.

"This study furthers the growing evidence to counteract those who don't believe that this vaccine works, which is now extremely encouraging," said chief executive Robert Music.

"We sincerely hope this will boost public faith in the HPV vaccine, so that more lives can be saved and we get closer to a world where cervical cancer is a thing of the past."
 
For @ginfreely .....

https://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv-vaccine-young-women.htm

Will sexually active females benefit from the vaccine?

Ideally females should get the vaccine before they become sexually active and exposed to HPV. Females who are sexually active may also benefit from vaccination, but they may get less benefit. This is because they may have already been exposed to one or more of the HPV types targeted by the vaccines. However, few sexually active young women are infected with all HPV types prevented by the vaccines, so most young women could still get protection by getting vaccinated.
 
If there is HIV vaccine one day, there will be more promiscuous fugs, families breaking up.
 
If there is HIV vaccine one day, there will be more promiscuous fugs, families breaking up.
A new mutated form of incurable STD will result. It's evolution! Lol :D
 
Who's Sue? Ummm!....:sneaky::sneaky::sneaky::sneaky:
https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/thinking-aloud.268233/post-2919904

How shall I start???

Ahem!

Ok. Let's not beat around the bush today.

I have numerous intimate partners all these years. Despite this, I do not understand a couple of them, I mean, the things they do after our sexual intimacies. Let me just talk about two of these "extreme end" women in this short post today. Incidentally, both are Sinkies, tertiary education, professionals and non-virgins, if you need to analyze their idiosyncratic behavioral characteristics.

The first is Sue (not her real name). Sue would always head straight to the shower within 2 minutes after both of us had achieved orgasms. The other is Claire (not her real name). She would hug me forever to the point of falling asleep, not bothering about the "messy discharged fluids" all over our bodies and the bed.

1. SUE. Up till today, though we are no longer together, I do not understand Sue and her urgent need to rush to the shower after we came. Once, I even dragged myself and followed her to the shower. I saw Sue, "frantically" washing her twat with bodywash. I laffed and teased at her, that no matter what she did, my little commando swimmer had already assaulted her defenseless egg nest. Sue didn't looked particularly pleased. Lol :biggrin:

But seriously, why? So, one day, I decided to speak Sue about her "idiosyncratic" twat washing ritual. She said she didn't want to catch any infection inside her twat. Ok fine, but I told her it would be nice if we could cuddle for like 15 minutes after orgasms, and enjoy the warmness of each other's body. It's called making love, not just pure fucking! To be fair to her, Sue did try her best to accommodate my request after we spoke. Not always, but often enough.

2. CLAIRE. On the other hand, Claire is the exact opposite. She loved to snuggle for long periods after our respective orgasms, to the point that she would literally smudge all my spunk and her fluids on our respective bodies, and all over the bed! And on some occasions, she would even cuddle up to me and take a nap or we would fall asleep till the next morning.

Curious, (given that it was not the same experience I had with Sue), I took a sober opportunity to ask Claire why she didn't mind the dampness or "wet feeling" on the bedsheet. She replied, "What's so bad about them? We even "ate" each other there!".

Fine, I guess to each her own. Life continues. Do what you are most comfortable with. I give up trying to find the real behavioural reason.
 
https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/thinking-aloud.268233/post-2919904

How shall I start???

Ahem!

Ok. Let's not beat around the bush today.

I have numerous intimate partners all these years. Despite this, I do not understand a couple of them, I mean, the things they do after our sexual intimacies. Let me just talk about two of these "extreme end" women in this short post today. Incidentally, both are Sinkies, tertiary education, professionals and non-virgins, if you need to analyze their idiosyncratic behavioral characteristics.

The first is Sue (not her real name). Sue would always head straight to the shower within 2 minutes after both of us had achieved orgasms. The other is Claire (not her real name). She would hug me forever to the point of falling asleep, not bothering about the "messy discharged fluids" all over our bodies and the bed.

1. SUE. Up till today, though we are no longer together, I do not understand Sue and her urgent need to rush to the shower after we came. Once, I even dragged myself and followed her to the shower. I saw Sue, "frantically" washing her twat with bodywash. I laffed and teased at her, that no matter what she did, my little commando swimmer had already assaulted her defenseless egg nest. Sue didn't looked particularly pleased. Lol :biggrin:

But seriously, why? So, one day, I decided to speak Sue about her "idiosyncratic" twat washing ritual. She said she didn't want to catch any infection inside her twat. Ok fine, but I told her it would be nice if we could cuddle for like 15 minutes after orgasms, and enjoy the warmness of each other's body. It's called making love, not just pure fucking! To be fair to her, Sue did try her best to accommodate my request after we spoke. Not always, but often enough.

2. CLAIRE. On the other hand, Claire is the exact opposite. She loved to snuggle for long periods after our respective orgasms, to the point that she would literally smudge all my spunk and her fluids on our respective bodies, and all over the bed! And on some occasions, she would even cuddle up to me and take a nap or we would fall asleep till the next morning.

Curious, (given that it was not the same experience I had with Sue), I took a sober opportunity to ask Claire why she didn't mind the dampness or "wet feeling" on the bedsheet. She replied, "What's so bad about them? We even "ate" each other there!".

Fine, I guess to each her own. Life continues. Do what you are most comfortable with. I give up trying to find the real behavioural reason.
That's the problem when no real names are used. I have been writing too much nonsense... Lol :D
 
KNN for a moment my uncle thought you talking about something related to PHV but similar trade of HPV - Hire Private Vagina vaccine KNN
 
Back
Top