If cannot accept, please get out

[Cottonmouth]

this island has a indian name located in malay archipelago. If chinese cannot accept non chinese PM, please go back to china.

• MALAYSIA
• WORLD
• MONEY
• LIFE
• EAT/DRINK
• SHOWBIZ
• OPINION
• SPORTS
• TECH/GADGETS
• DRIVE
• PROJEKMM
• 精彩大马

1. HOME
2. WORLD

Minister: Older generation of Singaporeans not ready for non-Chinese PM
Published 1 hour ago on 29 March 2019

Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat noted that while many among the young were happy to have a prime minister who is not Chinese, he said that this was not the case for all of Singapore. — TODAY pic
SINGAPORE, March 29 — A segment of Singapore’s population is happy to have an individual from a minority race as their prime minister, but the older generation is not ready for that.
Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat, who is expected to succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, said this during a forum at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU) yesterday. He was replying a question posed by a member of the audience, who noted that Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam was a popular choice to take on the top job.
In asking the question, Assistant Professor Walid Jumblatt Abdullah of NTU’s School of Social Sciences’ public policy and global affairs programme, also pointed out that Tharman’s popularity was evident in his constituency’s elections results.
A survey conducted by market research consultancy Blackbox in 2016 found that Tharman was the top choice among Singaporeans to succeed Lee, with 69 per cent of almost 900 respondents indicating that they would support him to be the candidate for prime minister.

“Is it Singapore who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister, or is it the PAP (the ruling People’s Action Party) who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister?” Walid asked.


While Heng noted that many among the 700 students who attended the ministerial forum organised by the NTU Students’ Union were happy to have a prime minister who is not Chinese, he said that this was not the case for all of Singapore.
“My own experience in walking the ground, in working with different people from all walks of life, is that the views — if you go by age and by life experience — would be very different,” the finance minister said.
He also noted that it was a good sign that young people today seem “quite comfortable” with having a non-Chinese prime minister as it showed that the government’s emphasis on standing united as one people “regardless of race, language or religion” had borne fruit.
Walid also asked if the government was sending out contradictory messages by reserving the 2017 Presidential Election for candidates from the Malay community while stating that Singapore is not ready for a prime minister from a minority race.
Heng stressed that it was “not contradictory”. “It is precisely because we need to place this emphasis institutionally that we recognise that we have not arrived. It is important for us to ensure that we have that safeguard.”
Pointing to what he witnessed when he took part in elections as “an observer” and not a candidate, he added: “I can tell you that it is not easy because it triggers all the feelings about race, which are not obvious. But when it comes to an election, it becomes an issue.”
At yesterday’s forum, Heng was also asked a range of questions across different topics, including the future of jobs and Singapore’s foreign policy.
An accountancy student asked if Singapore would follow the path indicated by the 2013 Population White Paper, which projected a population of up to 6.9 million here by 2030.
Heng said Singaporeans understand that rationally, the country needs more people as its workforce is declining, but “emotionally, we don’t feel comfortable”.
He also noted that openness and multiculturalism are important aspects to why Singapore is commemorating this year the 200th anniversary of the arrival of Sir Stamford Raffles.
“The more open we are, the more international we are in our outlook, the better it is for Singapore (and) the world. Because you don’t want a world where people build walls around themselves,” Heng added.

Fuck India fuck Indians.

 

[syed putra]

When Raffles' expedition arrived in Singapore on 29 January 1819 he discovered a small Malay settlement at the mouth of Singapore River headed by a Temenggung (governor) of Johor.

 

[laksaboy]

This is entrenched in article 152 and 153 of constitution.

The Sinkieland Constitution is a farce. Gives the PAP regime carte blanche to do whatever it pleases. A lot of 'special clauses' hidden in it.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

how is he so certain that he knows the "facts"? what if he's spewing fake news to gongcheebye sinkies as though what he says is the absolute truth? my parents who are in the 80's will vote for any monkey regardless of race. and they don't mind having a dog as pm. they just told me they don't need to have chink pm. those days are over.

Dude. Who was the one tat said singkieland not ready for an ah neh PM?

 

[Hypocrite-The]

When Raffles' expedition arrived in Singapore on 29 January 1819 he discovered a small Malay settlement at the mouth of Singapore River headed by a Temenggung (governor) of Johor.

And the sultan if Johor gave away singkieland to the poms. So m&ds technically have no more rights to singkieland. For the constitution to give recognition to the m&ds is s bonus the m&ds do not deserve

 

[eatshitndie]

Dude. Who was the one tat said singkieland not ready for an ah neh PM?

burmese pm should be ok.

 

[red amoeba]

That Heng is talking nonsense. He claim we cannot accept one Indian yet open the doors and let in thousands of other Indians and tell us don’t be homophobic.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

burmese pm should be ok.

Public office should only be held by locals, and males who had completed NS obligations, and be competent n willing to serve. The public service is not a play thing for the pappies n cronies etc. But the 70% happy with it. So cina pm ...faggot pm also nothing the 30% can do

 

[Wunderfool]

That Heng is talking nonsense. He claim we cannot accept one Indian yet open the doors and let in thousands of other Indians and tell us don’t be homophobic.

They are two different things .. one has no say in how the country is to be governed... the other controls the country.

 

[JohnTan]

And the sultan if Johor gave away singkieland to the poms. So m&ds technically have no more rights to singkieland. For the constitution to give recognition to the m&ds is s bonus the m&ds do not deserve

The m&ds were not in sinkieland anyway. Historical records indicate that there were only a handful of villages, no bustling towns or cities in Singapore. So most of Singapore was uninhabited jungle when the Brits and the coolies came. So it is weird to hear m&ds say that the chinks came only because the m&ds (plural) gave them permission to come as guests.

Singapore, if it belonged to anyone, belonged to a single m&d, the temengong, and he certainly did not agree with the concept that all m&ds owned Singapore or Johor land. He was the sole owner, as dictated under the local feudal system. And land owned by the sultan did not translate into any modern idea of land owned by all the peoples.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

The m&ds were not in sinkieland anyway. Historical records indicate that there were only a handful of villages, no bustling towns or cities in Singapore. So most of Singapore was uninhabited jungle when the Brits and the coolies came. So it is weird to hear m&ds say that the chinks came only because the m&ds (plural) gave them permission to come as guests.

Singapore, if it belonged to anyone, belonged to a single m&d, the temengong, and he certainly did not agree with the concept that all m&ds owned Singapore or Johor land. He was the sole owner, as dictated under the local feudal system. And land owned by the sultan did not translate into any modern idea of land owned by all the peoples.

Should tell the m&ds tat. And please tell yr pappie masters to eliminate positive discrimination policies for the m&ds n we can get rid of Makcik. The useless president who is ah neh n not m&d

 

[ginfreely]

That Heng is talking nonsense. He claim we cannot accept one Indian yet open the doors and let in thousands of other Indians and tell us don’t be homophobic.

Hey SIA dog what are you complaining? Your trusted Indian slut KT latha is also from mudland.

 

[ginfreely]

That’s why you ccb Malaysian chinese traitor dog son of whore run away from mudland and sell your backside to pap and start smearing me and those that you have an axe to grind with non stop while not daring to say a word while in mudland. Tell pap your master that I don’t pay taxes for quarter century for them to keep a dog to smear me a thief slut whore mistress ok son of Johor whore.

Why no reply from PAP dog @JohnTan ? Thief of my photos calling me thief. Have you told your master I don’t pay taxes for quarter century for them to keep dogs to steal slander harass and bully me? One more time I get called thief slut whore mistress by you PAP dog, I will email to your master Shanmugam to complain misuse of my taxes ok.