If we only have such opposition ...

[winnipegjets]

https://www.businessinsider.com/ale...-slams-corruption-in-oversight-hearing-2019-2

"So it's already super legal for me to be a pretty bad guy, but it's even easier for the president of the United States to be one," she concluded.

 

[laksaboy]

https://www.businessinsider.com/ale...-slams-corruption-in-oversight-hearing-2019-2

"So it's already super legal for me to be a pretty bad guy, but it's even easier for the president of the United States to be one," she concluded.

Trust me, Alex from the Bronx's days in Congress are numbered. Pelosi hates her. She's an airhead.

Just like Bernie Sanders, they're socialist-communist filth.

 

[winnipegjets]

Trust me, Alex from the Bronx's days in Congress are numbered. Pelosi hates her. She's an airhead.

Just like Bernie Sanders, they're socialist-communist filth.

USA needs someone like her to shake things up. What's so bad about providing health care for ALL Americans?
And 70 percent tax for income above $10 million, how much money does one need? If don't want to pay, then don't earn more than $10 million. No one's work is worth more than $10 million.
70 percent death tax on estate over $50 million seems totally reasonable. Again, if you don't want to pay so much estate tax, then move away or take it easy and don't earn so much.

When less money is controlled by the minority, then there is more for others to work for. And there will be less overpaying for 'talents'.

 

[Asterix]

...... What's so bad about providing health care for ALL Americans?......

What's so good about robbing from responsible citizens to make transfer payments to useless and ungrateful bastards?

Free sick care for all will only encourage the irresponsible to indulge in their bad habits because they know it will be other people who will foot the bill for them. Smokers, drunkards, gluttons and all manner of useless fucktards will waste society's limited resources.

The PRIVILEGE of free health care should be limited to those who have shown by their deeds that they are responsible citizens:

1) graduated with a professional degree from a reputable university,

2) paid at least $100,000 in income tax,

3) verified non-smoker, non-alcoholic and non-glutton,

4) other criteria as deemed appropriate

It will be a points based system like Aussie and Canadian immigration and China's social credit systems. If you score above 80 out of 100 points - your health care will be free for life in Class A ward or private hospital of your choice. If your score is below 40 - you die your problem and some diseases will not be treated regardless of how much money you have eg. Lung cancer for smokers, liver failure for drunkards and heart failure, diabetes, etc for gluttons.

This system of rationing sick care will allocate limited medical resources on the basis of merit and is perfectly doable with the advent of big data.

 

[laksaboy]

There's no such thing as free. Someone is paying for it.

Also, Occasional Kotex is a basket case; this is what she came up with recently.

The Dems are still butthurt that Bad Orange Man won in 2016, so they're pivoting far, far left to try and oust him in 2020.

 

[winnipegjets]

What's so good about robbing from responsible citizens to make transfer payments to useless and ungrateful bastards?

It is your choice ...if you want to live in this society, then chip in or move on to another jurisdiction where they let you screw the masses.

Free sick care for all will only encourage the irresponsible to indulge in their bad habits because they know it will be other people who will foot the bill for them. Smokers, drunkards, gluttons and all manner of useless fucktards will waste society's limited resources.

In any system, there will be abuses. Even you have taken advantage of your company in some ways. Do you throw the baby out with the bathwater?

The PRIVILEGE of free health care should be limited to those who have shown by their deeds that they are responsible citizens:

1) graduated with a professional degree from a reputable university,

2) paid at least $100,000 in income tax,

3) verified non-smoker, non-alcoholic and non-glutton,

4) other criteria as deemed appropriate

It will be a points based system like Aussie and Canadian immigration and China's social credit systems. If you score above 80 out of 100 points - your health care will be free for life in Class A ward or private hospital of your choice. If your score is below 40 - you die your problem and some diseases will not be treated regardless of how much money you have eg. Lung cancer for smokers, liver failure for drunkards and heart failure, diabetes, etc for gluttons.

This system of rationing sick care will allocate limited medical resources on the basis of merit and is perfectly doable with the advent of big data.

That's sound so much like the PAP way of doing things. You are living in nirvana then. Congrats.

 

[winnipegjets]

There's no such thing as free. Someone is paying for it.

Also, Occasional Kotex is a basket case; this is what she came up with recently.

The Dems are still butthurt that Bad Orange Man won in 2016, so they're pivoting far, far left to try and oust him in 2020.

That's right ...we are paying it. If paying to ensure that people are able to access essentials in life, that is a good thing. It is not all about you or me ...it is about creating a society when everyone can live decently.

 

[Asterix]

It is your choice ...if you want to live in this society, then chip in or move on to another jurisdiction where they let you screw the masses.

Typical liberal nazi. Governments should only have four functions and no more: external defense, internal policing, making and enforcing rules of the game. Nobody should be allowed to use their votes to rob others of their property even for a so-called 'good cause'. I am screwing the masses by not letting them steal my hard earned property to fund their irresponsible habits? More like the liberal retards and masses are trying to screw me by robbing me to make unnecessary and wasteful transfer payments to the ungrateful and useless "masses".

In any system, there will be abuses. Even you have taken advantage of your company in some ways. Do you throw the baby out with the bathwater?

Speak for yourself. I have NEVER taken advantage of my company. The baby is the four essential functions of government: defense, policing, making rules of the game and adjudicating disputes. Transfer payments to pay for luxuries for the undeserving and ungrateful masses is the bathwater and must be thrown away lest they corrupt the morality of the already very immoral masses. If you are so kind hearted and visionary, you should donate as much of your own money as possible to fund these 'worthy causes', but don't take other people's money without their consent.

sound so much like the PAP way of doing things. You are living in nirvana then. Congrats.

Do not let your hatred of the PAP blind you to the truth. There is no paradise on earth. I made trade offs eg I don't waste my money on frivolous luxuries like a new iPhone every 12 months and therefore can be self reliant in retirement, health care, etc. I do not make myself a burden to society and I am entitled to expect that strangers do not place a burden on me eg to fund sick care for fucking irresponsible bastards who smoke, drink and eat too much. If their family don't or can't fund their sick care, then too bad, better they die faster than waste society's limited resources. If they not happy, the masses can always move to Scandinavia. I bet you Scandinavia will not welcome them at all.