Chitchat Aussie White Trash Says Pacific Ocean Belongs To Aussie Empire! Chinkland Should Fuck Off! Squinty-Eyed Chink Diplomat Don't Dare Object!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
morrison.jpg


BEIJING / SYDNEY — Beijing and Canberra should be cooperating in the South Pacific and not be cast as strategic rivals, China's top diplomat said on Thursday (Nov 8), after Australia launched a multi-billion dollar fund to counter China's rising influence in the region.

Standing alongside Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne, Chinese State Councillor Wang Yi made the conciliatory remarks after a meeting in Beijing widely billed as a step toward re-setting bilateral ties after a lengthy diplomatic chill.


Mr Wang said that he had agreed with Ms Payne that the two countries could combine their respective strengths and embark on trilateral cooperation with Pacific island countries.

"We are not rivals, and we can absolutely become cooperation partners," Mr Wang told reporters, describing the meeting as important after the recent "ups and downs" in the relationship.

Ms Payne said the discussions were "valuable, full and candid".

"We've realistically acknowledged today that in a relationship as dynamic as ours ... there will be from time to time differences," she said later at a separate news briefing.

"But what is important about that is how we manage those and we are focused on managing them respectfully, mindful of the tremendous opportunities the relationship presents to both our nations."

Ties became strained late last year, when the previous Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull accused China of interfering in its domestic affairs. The two countries have also been vying for influence in sparsely populated Pacific island countries that control vast swathes of resource-rich ocean.

But even as his foreign minister visited Beijing, Prime Minister Scott Morrison characterised the Pacific as its domain while offering the region up to A$3 billion (S$3 billion) in cheap infrastructure loans and grants.

"This is our patch, this is our part of the world," Mr Morrison said in his most detailed foreign policy speech since becoming prime minister in August.

Speaking in Queensland, Mr Morrison said Australia would invest in telecommunications, energy, transport and water projects in the region.

He also said Australia would also expand its diplomatic presence in the Pacific, posting staff to Palau, the Marshall Islands, French Polynesia, Niue and the Cook Islands.

There are also plans to strengthen Australia's defence and security ties with Pacific islands through joint exercises and training.

Mr Morrison did not name China in the speech, but analysts said it was a clear response to China's spreading influence.

"Australia is reacting to what China is doing. Australia needs more tools to engage with the Pacific," said Mr Jonathan Pryke, a Pacific Islands foreign policy expert with the Lowy Institute, an Australian think-tank.

China has spent US$1.3 billion (S$1.78 billion) on concessionary loans and gifts since 2011 to become the Pacific's second-largest donor after Australia, stoking concern in the West that several tiny nations could end up overburdened and in debt to Beijing.

On Wednesday, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said Australia would oppose a A$13 billion buyout of APA Group, Australia's biggest gas pipeline company, by Hong Kong's CK Group on grounds that it would be against the national interest.

While reiterating the government's stand on APA, Ms Payne said Australia remained open to Chinese investment. Mr Wang said Beijing welcomed that assurance.

Last December, Beijing took umbrage at Mr Turnbull's comments and the subsequent introduction of legislation to counter foreign interference, which appeared to be directed in large part at China.

Prior to Ms Payne's visit, China had unofficially suspended accepting visits by senior Australian ministers, and Chinese state media had carried numerous anti-Australian articles. REUTERS

https://www.todayonline.com/world/chinas-power-play-south-pacific-meets-australian-rebuttal
 
The pacific states don't support Australia because of aid cutback. China has showered them with generous aid. What influence does Australia have? $3 billion is nothing compare to what China is giving.
 
Got nuke can go fight PLA.

No nuke go fly kite!

Chow Ang Moh = Jiao Kia Um Pat Lastich = tiny bird don't recognize catapult
 
Australia is white and will always be so because of its racism; not openly but subtly! Australia wants to be a regional power with an eye on China! Sheer stupidity! It should look after its own backside because Indonesia will be the real regional power once it builds up its armed forces to a threatening level.
 
ABC Home
OpenSitesmenu - use enter key to open and tab key to navigate
Log In
SearchABC NewsOpen menu
BUSINESS
Chinese influence drives Australia's multi-billion-dollar pivot to the Pacific
PACIFIC BEAT BY PACIFIC AFFAIRS REPORTER STEPHEN DZIEDZICABOUT 3 HOURS AGO

PHOTO
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi with Papua New Guinea's Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato last month.
ABC NEWS
Yesterday Scott Morrison unveiled his pivot to the Pacific.
Key points:
  • A $2 billion infrastructure bank for Pacific nations is the centrepiece of the plan
  • Until now, Australia has largely funnelled aid into health, education and governance projects
  • Pacific leaders welcomed the announcement but want Australia to focus more on climate
The plan was ambitious, and the list of promises was long.
Australia will open five new diplomatic missions in the Pacific.
The Government will also ramp up military cooperation, with more Navy deployments in the region and a permanent Defence Force team tasked with training their counterparts in the Pacific.
Most important of all, the Prime Minister announced Australia will also get into the infrastructure game in the Pacific, plunging billions of dollars into projects across the region through grants and soft loans.
It's a seismic shift in Pacific policy that will reverberate through the region for decades.
But what's driving this announcement? What are the pitfalls?
And why is Australia suddenly so intent on boosting its influence in a region the Prime Minister called "our patch"?
PHOTO Pacific nations complain that too much Australian aid money is funnelled to well-paid Western consultants.
ABC NEWS: IAN CUTMORE
Why are we suddenly so worried about the Pacific?
Because we are anxious about losing friends and influence.
For a long time Australia was in a very comfortable position in the Pacific.
Lowy Institute Pacific Aid Map

Aid is an important resource for the Pacific Islands region, but public information is often lacking. The Lowy Institute Pacific Aid Map is designed to enhance aid effectiveness.
A close ally and the world's sole superpower, the United States, ruled the waves.
And all the major players in the region — the US, New Zealand, France — were friends and partners.
Our relationship with the Pacific was defined by aid. How much should we give? What could we do to lift living standards?
The Pacific was a place we felt had to help, but it commanded little attention at the highest levels of government.
Jonathan Pryke from the Lowy Institute says most Australian politicians regarded the Pacific as a strategic backwater — and largely ignored it.
"Geopolitics in the Pacific had been pretty benign since World War II, so were able to operate with a degree of benign neglect," he says.​
But about a decade ago, that began to change.
In around 2006, China entered the fray. It started to offer Pacific nations large amounts of money and build up its political influence across the region.
And now the Pacific is slowly morphing from a calm expanse of water dominated by Western interests into a choppy ocean churned by global headwinds.
So, is this all about China?
Yes. This is largely all about China.
While several nations have ramped up their engagement in the Pacific since 2000, Beijing has built diplomatic and financial muscle in the region with surprising speed.
"The one clear motivator behind all this is China. We are now seeing China's presence on the ground in the Pacific really clearly," Mr Pryke says.​
"They're on the ground everywhere in the region. And policy makershave finally taken note."
It's easy to exaggerate Beijing's influence — after all, a recent Lowy Institute analysis showed that Australia still gives vastly more aid to the Pacific than any other nation, including China.
But China has won friends by plunging money into flagship infrastructure projects — bridges, ports, stadiums and government buildings — which many Pacific governments want.
That's allowed Beijing to build capital across the region for comparatively little outlay.
"This has been in the works for decades. All the infrastructure projects they've committed to have finally come to fruition," Mr Pryke says.
And Australia is paying attention.
Some defence and intelligence analysts worry that China is engaged in "debt-trap diplomacy", accusing Beijing of searching for assets in the Pacific that could be converted to military bases.
China fiercely contests those claims. And some experts are deeply sceptical that Chinese lending presents a big problem.
But the fundamental issue is that China's aims are opaque to Australia.
And Mr Pryke says that uncertainty is driving many decisions in Canberra right now.
"We are by no means convinced that strategic interests are aligned with our own. That's a profound paradigm shift to what we had in the past," he says.
So what are we actually going to do?
Right now, Australian aid is largely funnelled into projects to promote health, education and governance across the Pacific.
We've poured plenty of money into multilateral institutions that provide infrastructure, but we've mostly shied away from bricks and mortar.
Which country gives the most aid to the Pacific?

The answer might surprise you, writes Stephen Dziedzic.
Mr Morrison has made it clear that will change.
Australia will create a $2 billion infrastructure bank for new projects across the region. Pacific island nations will be able to draw on the bank to get discounted loans for ports, roads, telecommunications infrastructure.
This is a fundamental shift in Australia's Pacific aid policy.
It's being partly driven by Pacific leaders. They complain that too much Australian aid money is funnelled to well-paid Western consultants.
And they say China is quicker to hand over money for projects that they want.
Australia has typically left infrastructure building in the region to multilateral institutions like the Asian Development Bank.
If we want to run our own infrastructure bank with a more strategic focus then we'll need to quickly develop the expertise to run it effectively.
And some Pacific nations cannot afford to borrow more to fund infrastructure, because they're already loaded down with debt.
VIDEO 8:41Australia's Pacific push to counter China
THE WORLD

"There's clearly been an infrastructure binge. The reality is now that many Pacific island countries aren't in a position to take on much more," Mr Pryke says.
"It seems like we have come a little bit late to the party."​
What do Pacific leaders think?
It's early days, but so far Pacific leaders have welcomed Scott Morrison's announcement.
The Deputy Prime Minister of Cook Islands, Mark Brown, told the ABC that Australia's new fund would provide "viable alternatives to what Pacific countries have been turning towards over the last years to non-traditional development partners".
"So for us to be able to have the choice with the increased presence of both Australia and New Zealand in the Pacific can only be good for the Pacific countries," he said.
Papua New Guinea's Deputy Prime Minister Charles Abel says his nation is also happy to see Australia's attention focused on the Pacific.
"Our general view [is] that Australia also needs to step up — they need to maintain their presence and influence in the region as well," he said.​
Still, there's a catch.
Mr Morrison didn't mention climate change in his speech yesterday.
But Pacific leaders have made it clear they see it as the greatest threat to their prosperity and security, and they're frustrated that Australia hasn't done more to curb its carbon emissions.
PHOTO Pacific nations are among those that have the most to lose from climate change.
SUPPLIED: DARREN JAMES

Mark Brown says the Cook Islands would like see climate change issues "more accurately clarified" by Australia.
"For us the climate change issues are significant, they're at the front and centre of any development initiative in the Pacific island countries," he said
"So we welcome engaging more with Australia to see what further commitment Australia will provide, not just in the infrastructure fund but also in their contributions towards the effects of climate change."
SHARE
Email Facebook Twitter
RELATED
PM announces multi-billion-dollar infrastructure fund for Pacific
China's Foreign Minister hits back at criticism of aid in Pacific
Why Australia wants to build its own 'Belt and Road' scheme with Japan and the US
MORE STORIES
Pyne tells Turnbull plotters to take responsibility for leadership spill
Analysis: Clear Q, vague A — the big stumper left hanging in ousted PM's TV appearance
California bar gunman who killed 12 people identified as former US Marine
'Don't go outside. The Nazis are here': Kristallnacht survivor fears it will happen again
Sarah Sanders accused of sharing 'doctored' video to justify CNN reporter's suspension
Sharks 'bigger and fatter' and numbers 'out of control' in north Queensland, fisher says
Tokyo university scandal signals broader issue of gender inequality in Japan
How a clerical typo ruined a Brisbane couple's financial reputation
Chart of the day: The OECD country that imprisons more journalists than China
Trump's next major problem is moving closer and closer — and they're not giving up
BUSINESS
MORE FROM ABC NEWS
Top of pageChange to standard view
 
Australia should attack China. The whites will definitely win because the Chinks are scared of Ang Mohs. They have had their butts kicked by Ang Mohs in the past and they know that it can happen again and again.
 
The pacific states don't support Australia because of aid cutback. China has showered them with generous aid. What influence does Australia have? $3 billion is nothing compare to what China is giving.
You mean debt. And not aid. China more like loan sharks.
 
The southern pacific belongs to the polynesians. China abd aussies get out!
 
The pacific states don't support Australia because of aid cutback. China has showered them with generous aid. What influence does Australia have? $3 billion is nothing compare to what China is giving.
The Pacific states are just parasites. They expect free handouts and it's good ah tiong land using ah long tactics on them. If they think ang mors are bad ..wait till ah tiong land controls them. They will be treated worse than the Africans by ah tiong land.
 
Australia is white and will always be so because of its racism; not openly but subtly! Australia wants to be a regional power with an eye on China! Sheer stupidity! It should look after its own backside because Indonesia will be the real regional power once it builds up its armed forces to a threatening level.
Indonesians are no threat to anyone except maybe malaysia and singapore due to historical reasons. Indonesians could have colonised australia hundreds of years ago but did not. The climate and environment does not support rice cultivation.
 
If singapore belongs to chinese, it should have chinese name.like hsinan( but not taiwan,as that belongs to orang asli and chinese migrated there only after dutch colonisation).
 
I dare China sail their Blue water navy into South Pacific.
 
If singapore belongs to chinese, it should have chinese name.like hsinan( but not taiwan,as that belongs to orang asli and chinese migrated there only after dutch colonisation).
Yes I soo agree. The stupid pap should have changed singkieland name to Nanyang. Than expel all the m&ds.
 
Back
Top