Men love to win by cheating!

[ginfreely]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/11/...enjoy-this-one.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes

Why Groups of 3 Will Ruin the World Cup (So Enjoy This One)
Unless FIFA changes course, the risk of collusion will be much higher in future Cups.

Image
A new format with 48 teams, starting in 2026 but possibly as soon as the next World Cup, raises a serious fairness issue in the chase for the World Cup trophy.CreditAlexander Zemlianichenko/Associated Press
By Julien Guyon
June 11, 2018

65
If you’re a World Cup aficionado, you may want to take the time to savor this one, because it may be the last version with a format — groups of four teams — that has a fair and consistently exciting opening phase.

The new opening format — two teams advancing from groups of three in an expanded 48-team field in 2026, and possibly as soon as the next World Cup in 2022 — raises a very serious issue: The risk of collusion will be much higher.

In many cases, the two teams playing the last game in the group will know exactly what results will let them both advance to the knockout stage — at the expense of the third team of the group.

A match in the 1982 World Cup in Gijón, Spain, is probably the most infamous example of World Cup collusion. In what became known as the Disgrace of Gijón, West Germany and Austria appeared to arrange a 1-0 Germany victory that would let both teams advance to the second round. The clear signs of coordination, in which little attempt was made to score in the final 80 minutes, came at the expense of Algeria, which had played its last group game against Chile the day before.

 

[ginfreely]

Since then, all teams in a given group have played their last group match at the same time. Although this has not eliminated the possibility of coordination, it has reduced it significantly.

But of course this arrangement is impossible when groups have an odd number of teams, such as three.

Let’s look at hypotheticals in the new format. In a group of three, we’ll call A the team that plays the first two group matches, and B and C the two other teams. If we use the current World Cup rules (3 points for a win, 1 for a draw, 0 for a loss, with ties in the standings decided by higher overall goal difference, then higher overall number of goals scored), risk of collusion will occur exactly in the following cases, after Team A has played its two matches:

Case 1: Team A has one win and one loss, and a goal difference that is negative or 0.

Case 2: Team A has two draws.
Case 3: Team A has one draw and one loss.

In these situations, there is a result of the last group game (B vs. C) that eliminates A.

Let’s imagine that the United States is Team A and that Canada and Mexico are teams B and C. (This would not be a realistic World Cup group, but we’re using these three as examples because they’re jointly hosting the 2026 World Cup, which will feature the new format.)

If the United States (A) won by 1-0 against Canada and lost by 2-0 against Mexico (Case 1), Mexico could agree to lose by 1-0 against Canada in the last group game and would still win the group, with Canada as the runner-up.

If the United States has two draws of 0-0 and 1-1 (Case 2), Mexico and Canada could arrange a 2-2 draw to eliminate the U.S. because of a higher number of goals scored. In Case 3, any draw between Mexico and Canada eliminates the U.S.

 

[ginfreely]

Just like the Malaysian dogs colluding with each other here to win me good Singaporean woman!

 

[AhMeng]

Followed by...

And then...

Finally...

 

[Valium]

That's rich coming from a slut.

 

[sweetiepie]

Since then, all teams in a given group have played their last group match at the same time. Although this has not eliminated the possibility of coordination, it has reduced it significantly.

But of course this arrangement is impossible when groups have an odd number of teams, such as three.

Let’s look at hypotheticals in the new format. In a group of three, we’ll call A the team that plays the first two group matches, and B and C the two other teams. If we use the current World Cup rules (3 points for a win, 1 for a draw, 0 for a loss, with ties in the standings decided by higher overall goal difference, then higher overall number of goals scored), risk of collusion will occur exactly in the following cases, after Team A has played its two matches:

Case 1: Team A has one win and one loss, and a goal difference that is negative or 0.

Case 2: Team A has two draws.
Case 3: Team A has one draw and one loss.

In these situations, there is a result of the last group game (B vs. C) that eliminates A.

Let’s imagine that the United States is Team A and that Canada and Mexico are teams B and C. (This would not be a realistic World Cup group, but we’re using these three as examples because they’re jointly hosting the 2026 World Cup, which will feature the new format.)

If the United States (A) won by 1-0 against Canada and lost by 2-0 against Mexico (Case 1), Mexico could agree to lose by 1-0 against Canada in the last group game and would still win the group, with Canada as the runner-up.

If the United States has two draws of 0-0 and 1-1 (Case 2), Mexico and Canada could arrange a 2-2 draw to eliminate the U.S. because of a higher number of goals scored. In Case 3, any draw between Mexico and Canada eliminates the U.S.

KNN don't think my uncle don't know you know nothing about football and only masterbate with amdk yummy dick KNN

 

[ginfreely]

That's rich coming from a slut.

That’s exactly the same statement that cottonmouth ccb Malaysian son of Johor slut said. You are caught again. Ccb bising Malaysian son of whore that knows the word bising!

 

[Valium]

That’s exactly the same statement that ccb Malaysian son of Johor slut said. You are caught again. Ccb bising Malaysian son of whore that knows the word bising!

PUKI BESAR. There's only that many words to describe that smelly filthy cunt of yours.

 

[ginfreely]

KNN don't think my uncle don't know you know nothing about football and only masterbate with amdk yummy dick KNN

When did I say I know football? In fact I already said I don’t watch football. So why should I know football except from these New York Times articles that said men like to act and men like to win by collusion in football! You ccb Malaysians are always telling vicious lies of me. Really no shame ccb Malaysians!

 

[ginfreely]

PUKI BESAR. There's only that many words to describe that smelly filthy cunt of yours.

Puki you ccb Malaysian son of Johor whore caught!

 

[ginfreely]

That’s exactly the same statement that ccb Malaysian son of Johor slut said. You are caught again. Ccb bising Malaysian son of whore that knows the word bising!

Oh left out the name is cottonmouth!

 

[Valium]

When did I say I know football? In fact I already said I don’t watch football. So why should I know football except from these New York Times articles that said men like to act and men like to win by collusion in football! You ccb Malaysians are always telling vicious lies of me. Really no shame ccb Malaysians!

Football can fit your goal post nicely.

 

[AhMeng]

 

[Valium]

Oh left out the name is cottonmouth!

You stupid slut, haven't I told you we are all clones of @Leongsam

 

[ginfreely]

When did I say I know football? In fact I already said I don’t watch football. So why should I know football except from these New York Times articles that said men like to act and men like to win by collusion in football! You ccb Malaysians are always telling vicious lies of me. Really no shame ccb Malaysians!

Ccb Malaysians are in collusion using vicious lies to win a good Singaporean woman. Go boast of your ccb win in your ccb Malaysian newspapers of how ccb Malaysians win me!

 

[ginfreely]

Football can fit your goal post nicely.

Ccb Malaysians only win can a good Singaporean woman using sexual harassment and vicious lies. That’s how ccb Malaysians are!

 

[Valium]

Ccb Malaysians are in collusion using vicious lies to win a good Singaporean woman. Go boast of your ccb win in your ccb Malaysian newspapers of how ccb Malaysians win me!

Take off your panties bitch. I've got a surprise for you.

 

[ginfreely]

Diam lah ccb son of pahang slut that treat insulting me as entertainment. Go boast in your ccb Malaysian newspapers of that!

 

[ginfreely]

Take off your panties bitch. I've got a surprise for you.

Diam lah ccb Malaysian son of whore take up my virginity test challenge! Coward ccb bully!

 

[ginfreely]

Ccb Malaysians why dare not go boast in your ccb Malaysian newspapers how you win good Singaporean woman using vicious lies and stealing her photos and spreading until India Iran. So smart so clever go boast lah ccb Malaysians!