Abe Shizo surrendered to Xijinping, Taiwan betrayed by Bakayaros!

[democracy my butt]

http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-05-13/doc-ihamfahx4083132.shtml

日本首相安倍确认将与台湾切割 台媒：民进党失靠山
日本首相安倍确认将与台湾切割 台媒：民进党失靠山

0

　　台媒截图。

　　海外网5月13日电 国务院总理李克强于近日访问日本并与日本首相安倍晋三会面，中日关系快速回暖。台媒称，李克强此次访日取得的最重大成果，除了达成中日“海空联络机制”协定外，就是让安倍亲口确认了“日本仅会与台湾保持民间往来”。台媒形容，这是安倍执政以来首次对中国大陆表达如此明确的对台政策，民进党痛失靠山，“台独”也失去了主要的“精神支撑力量”。

　　台媒：日有意与台政治切割 “台独”痛失支持

　　据新华社消息，当地时间5月9日，国务院总理李克强与日本首相安倍晋三举行了会谈。李克强在会谈中强调，在台湾问题上，希望日方信守承诺，坚持一个中国原则。安倍晋三承诺，日方将按照日中联合声明的规定，仅同台湾保持民间往来。在晚上的记者会上，安倍晋三还表示，我同李克强总理会谈达成许多重要共识。双方同意设立海空联络机制，共同管控海上危机，使东海成为和平、合作、友好之海。

　　关于“海空联络机制”，外交部曾回应，中日双方在东海危机管控问题上的目标是一致的。建立海空联络机制有助于双方增进互信，管控分歧，维护东海和平稳定。当前两国相关部门正为启动该机制加快相关准备工作。

　　对此，台媒分析，而中日关系的回暖，则意味台湾及民进党的“寒冷期”将至，日有意与台政治切割。报道指出，李克强此次访日不仅在经济贸易方面与日本达成多项共识并签署文件，还达成了海空联络机制，避免中日在钓鱼岛争议上发生武装冲突；而对台湾最大的影响，则是安倍在与李克强会面时明确强调，“将会按照《中日联合声明》的规定，仅与台湾保持民间往来。”报道指出，这相较安倍之前的对台表态已经出现了明显的不同，这样的表态颇有与台湾在政治层面切割关系之意。

　　另外，台媒还直指，“台独”失“精神支撑力量”。报道称，长期以来，日本都被看做是追求“台独”的民进党主要保护力量，如今中日关系的发展及安倍的表态无疑将对民进党带来重大负面影响。在很长一段时间内（特朗普在任期间），民进党恐怕很难再与日本政府产生更多忽明忽暗的互动；民进党在与大陆发生强烈对撞时，也很难再从日本获得更多的实际保护，除了失去此一重大实质政治筹码外，“台独”也失去了主要的“精神支撑力量”。

　　报道最后发出警示，安倍晋三是否会“说一套做一套”还要观察，但他的转向足以让民进党明白，如果民进党无法和大陆建立真正的良性沟通管道，台湾将始终无法摆脱棋子和被交换的命运，民进党无论牺牲多少台湾利益都不会换来美日的“永久保护”。

　　台媒早前曝出“台日关系”出现警讯

　　其实，近日，台媒就曝出，所谓“台日关系”出现警讯。据台湾联合新闻网8日发表文章称，上周是日本黄金周，然而与过去日本议员赴台“络绎不绝”的情形不同，今年却是“门可罗雀”，只有“区区两小团”，而且全是日本在野党议员（立宪民主党的莲舫及公明党议员富田茂），没有一位是自民党议员，“台日关系”似乎出现不寻常的警讯。

　　台媒认为，日本对台当局态度的转变，绝非一夕造成，而是一种日积月累的过程。自从民进党上台之后，日本方面便对蔡当局解禁福岛食品进口保持相当高的期待，然而民进党执政已经两年多，连个开放的影子都没看到，这让日本觉得，蔡英文当局与马英九当局似乎没有太大异同。

　　此外，台媒也注意到，在国际政治风向转变下，中日关系转暖已成为一种不可避免的趋势，而“台日关系”的空间势必将进一步被压缩，这让蔡当局陷入“两难困境”，不知要以解禁来“挽回日本”，还是要持续严禁来“挽救民意”。（海外网 庞晟）


Japanese Prime Minister Abe Confirms to Cut Taiwan's Taiwan Media: Democratic Progressive Party Lost
Japanese Prime Minister Abe Confirms to Cut Taiwan's Taiwan Media: Democratic Progressive Party Lost
0

Taiwan media screenshots.

Overseas Network, May 13th: Premier Li Keqiang visited Japan and met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in recent days. Sino-Japanese relations have quickly recovered. Taiwan media claimed that Li Keqiang’s most important achievement in his visit to Japan was to allow Abe to personally confirm that “Japan will only maintain non-governmental exchanges with Taiwan”, in addition to the agreement on the "sea-air contact mechanism" between China and Japan. Taiwan media described it as the first time since Abe took office that China expressed such a clear policy toward Taiwan. The Democratic Progressive Party has lost its back ground and "Taiwan independence" has lost its main "spiritual support force."

Taiwan media: Japan intends to cut Taiwan’s politics and “Taiwan independence” loses support

According to Xinhua News Agency, on May 9, local time, Premier Li Keqiang held talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. During the talks, Li Keqiang emphasized that on the Taiwan issue, he hoped the Japanese side will honor its commitment and adhere to the one-China principle. Abe promised that the Japanese side will only maintain civilian exchanges with Taiwan in accordance with the provisions of the Japan-China Joint Statement. At a press conference in the evening, Shinzo Abe also stated that I had reached many important consensuses with Prime Minister Li Keqiang. The two sides agreed to establish a sea-air liaison mechanism to jointly manage the maritime crisis and make the East China Sea a sea of peace, cooperation, and friendship.

Regarding the "air and sea liaison mechanism," the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has responded that both China and Japan have the same goal on the issue of control and control of the crisis in the East China Sea. The establishment of an air and sea liaison mechanism will help both sides increase mutual trust, manage differences and maintain peace and stability in the East China Sea. At present, relevant departments of the two countries are speeding up relevant preparations for starting the mechanism.

In this regard, Taiwan media analysis, and the warming up of Sino-Japanese relations, means that Taiwan and the Democratic Progressive Party’s “cold period” is approaching, and Japan intends to cut Taiwan’s politics. The report pointed out that Li Keqiang's visit to Japan not only reached a number of consensuses and signed documents with Japan in economics and trade, but also reached a sea-air contact mechanism to avoid the armed conflicts between China and Japan in the Diaoyu Islands dispute; and the greatest impact on Taiwan is It was during the meeting with Li Keqiang that Abe made it clear that "we will follow the provisions of the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement to maintain private contacts with Taiwan only." The report pointed out that this has made a marked difference from the attitude of Abe before Taiwan. Such a position is quite different from Taiwan’s intention to cut the relationship at the political level.

In addition, Taiwan media also pointed out that "Taiwan independence" has lost its "spiritual support strength." The report stated that Japan has long been regarded as the main protectionist of the DPP in pursuit of "Taiwan independence". The development of Sino-Japanese relations and Abe's position will undoubtedly have a major negative impact on the DPP. For a long period of time (Dr. Trump's tenure), the DPP feared that it would be difficult for the DPP to have more flamboyant interactions with the Japanese government. When the Democratic Progressive Party had a strong confrontation with the mainland, it would be very difficult to To obtain more practical protection from Japan, apart from losing such a major substantive political stake, "Taiwan independence" has also lost its main "spiritual support force."

The report finally issued a warning. Whether Abe would “say to do a set” is still to be observed, but his turn is enough for the DPP to understand that if the DPP cannot establish a truly benign communication channel with the mainland, Taiwan will always be unable to To get rid of the chess pieces and the fate of being exchanged, the DPP will not exchange US-Japanese “permanent protection” no matter how much Taiwan’s interests are sacrificed.

Taiwan media earlier exposed the "Taiwan-Japan relations" warning

In fact, in recent days, Taiwan media has revealed that the so-called "Taiwan-Japan relations" has emerged as a warning. According to an article issued by Taiwan’s United News Service on the 8th, last week was Japan’s Golden Week. However, unlike the “plurality” of Japanese lawmakers visiting Taiwan in the past, this year it is “a small crowd” and only “two small groups”. All are members of the opposition party in Japan (Lotus of the Constitutional Democratic Party and Tomomi Mao of the Komeito Party). None of them are members of the Liberal Democratic Party. It seems that the "Taiwan-Japan relations" have an unusual warning.

Taiwan media believes that the change in Japan’s attitude towards Taiwan authorities is not caused overnight, but it is a cumulative process. Since the DPP took power, the Japanese side has maintained a very high expectation for the Cai authorities to ban the import of Fukushima food. However, the Democratic Progressive Party has been in power for more than two years and has not even seen the shadow of opening. This makes Japan feel that Cai The English authorities and the Ma Ying-jeou authorities do not seem to have much similarities and differences.

In addition, Taiwan media also noted that under the change of international political trends, the warming of Sino-Japanese relations has become an unavoidable trend, and the space of “Taiwan-Japan relations” will inevitably be further squeezed. This causes the Cai authorities to fall into a dilemma. "I do not know whether it is necessary to "restore Japan" by lifting the ban, or continue to forbid "to save the people's will." (Overseas Network Pang Yu)

 

[syed putra]

But but.....taiwan was under japanese rule in WWII. It belongs to japan. Taiwanese makes up the most number of visitors to japan. Even taiwanese orefer jaosnese to being ruled by chinese. Older taiwanese can still speak japanese.
Best for communist china to stick to their current territory minus tibet, mongolia and xinjiang.

 

[war is best form of peace]

But but.....taiwan was under japanese rule in WWII. It belongs to japan. Taiwanese makes up the most number of visitors to japan. Even taiwanese orefer jaosnese to being ruled by chinese. Older taiwanese can still speak japanese.
Best for communist china to stick to their current territory minus tibet, mongolia and xinjiang.

You wrong! Whole world is belong only to carnage. And Winer takes all as usual.

Historical claims are too civilized and insignificant.

Whole Japan had been subordinate territory to many Chinese Dynasties.

To be practical, 4 to 5 major continents must be carnaged to no-man-zone aka Natural Reserve & Resource Reserve for several centuries to let the ruined Planet Earth recover and let natural eco systems prosper. Absolutely no man nor resource exploitation allowed. Satellites and drones and robots protect these territories and automatically eliminate any human in these No-Man-Zones.

 

[democracy my butt]

Japs sold Taiwan off to join 1B1R, Taiwan is left to be cannibalized by PLA, Japs want to be part of 1B1R!

http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/dgby/2018-05-13/doc-ihamfahx5481112.shtml

中国一带一路成中日合作新机遇 日媒：它影响力太强
中国一带一路成中日合作新机遇 日媒：它影响力太强

0
　　“一带一路”是这次中日智库媒体高端对话会的主要议题之一。从讨论中中日双方参会者的表述看，显然已经超越了日本要不要参与“一带一路”的阶段，而是开始探讨中日企业可以什么样的方式或在什么项目上进行合作。这让笔者很自然地想起了上世纪五十年代初的欧洲煤钢共同体。

　　今天的欧盟就是从上世纪50年代初建立的煤钢共同体起步的。这一建议在1950年由法国外长舒曼提出并得到了德国的积极响应。法国前总理罗卡尔如此描述欧洲一体化创建者们最初的追求，“他们不是为了寻求友谊，他们只是为了制止战争。”

　　经济合作是当时有可能拉近法德的唯一可行方式，煤钢共同体的起步为两国之间建立正常国家关系建立了一个机制，也为一个统一的区域合作框架奠定了基础，最终消除了未来战争的可能性。

　　在我们的讨论中，有与会者表示，期待中日之间也能逐步建立类似的正常国家关系。中央电视台著名主持人白岩松认为，中日关系重回上世纪八九十年代的蜜月期，已经不再可能。但他期待的是“有问题也不妨碍交流”，特别是高层交往不要中断。

　　双方都意识到，这并非意味着要刻意回避矛盾和摩擦，而是为解决这些问题设立一些机制，管控分歧。即使有问题，也可以保持正常的各个层面的来往。要做到这一点，欧洲的经验是，先从经济合作开始。

　　中日在“一带一路”框架中的合作符合双方利益。

　　今天的中日经济，已经深度交融。日本媒体几年前进行的一项调查显示，一个普通的日本家庭在将所有“中国制造”产品从家中移除后，发现几乎已成“一无所有”。这样的调查如果“挪”到中国，很多中国家庭在去除“日本制造”的元素之后，可能也会面临“难以运转”的麻烦。几乎所有的手机、家电和汽车都离不开日本的元器件。

　　2017年日本对华出口增长20.5%，达到近15万亿日元。其中，制造智能手机用的液晶器件、芯片和半导体制造设备等增长最快。日本对华投资也超过了1000亿美元。而两国去年的贸易额达到了3029亿美元。

　　恰如中国公共外交协会副会长胡正跃所说：“利益的高度融合成为中日双边关系压舱石。”

　　当然，这只反应了双边经济的融和程度，更重要的是中日经济的融和对亚洲和全球经济的影响越来越大。比如，我们现在很难说一部iPhone有多少零部件是在中国或日本制造的。可以肯定的是，有很多类似的产品都是中日合作生产并出口到第三方市场的。双方在产业链中分享了利润，并将这一链条延伸到其他国家。这种合作的形式以及深度都是前所未有的。

　　中日经济也存在竞争，尤其是随着中国制造能力的提升，竞争的特点越来越显著。双方出现了不少分歧。

　　此次对话会之前，中日两国政府在时隔八年之后，于4月16日重启“中日高级别经济对话”。日方在会上对中方重提“保护知识产权”和“化解钢铁产能过剩”的问题。这样的分歧还会影响到未来的合作，但对于已经如此深度融和的中日经济来说，出现类似问题也是正常的，可以通过更密切的磋商来解决。

　　在竞争中合作是未来中日经济关系的主要形态。

　　竞争使技术进步，合作则使我们能够共存。“一带一路”就是要打造一个合作的平台，让更多的利益相关方通过合作取得发展。合作对中日这两个亚洲最大的经济体来说，至关重要。因为我们的合作不仅将关系到我们自身的生存，也关系到更多国家的生存与发展。

　　日方之所以会对“一带一路”的认识出现变化，一个原因是中国因实力提升超过日本成为亚洲“老大”，并用前所未有的力度来推动“一带一路”；另一个原因是日方看到了这个倡议在东南亚和亚洲很多地区正在产生积极效应，而这些地区也一直是日本企业投资的目的地。

胡正跃与日本外务省政务官堀井严交谈
　　日本外务省的“二把手”、政务官堀井严在与代表团交谈时表示，“日本认为中国是全球经济大国，给地区各个国家的发展作出了贡献，对此表示敬意。中国经济发展有利于日本、有利于亚洲地区，也有利于全世界。中国的发展给地区各个国家带来了自己的发展。”

　　堀井严当然没有忘记表述日本官方的基本立场：“我们应该推动双赢的经济关系发展，应该按照国际标准动公平、公正的交易，所以日本可以与中国的‘一带一路’倡议一道发展。”但是，他又补充说，日本在亚洲很多地方看到，中国提出的“一带一路”已经产生了良好反应。

　　日本《每日新闻》不久前在一篇评论说，在美国特朗普政府贸易保护主义政策之下，中国正以强大的经济力量为背景，吸引多个国家参与“一带一路”，并努力构建中国主导的经济圈。最近日本表现出的合作姿态说明，这一倡议的影响力已经到了不能无视的程度。

　　以往，中日之间在很多涉及第三方的项目中都展开过竞争，有时甚至竞争到对方无法赢利或极少赢利的地步。采取这种形式拿到的项目往往也会在进行过程中出问题，最终对第三方也不利。“一带一路”提供的是三方获益的可能。

　　多年来，中日两国企业在推动一些发展中国家的基础建设中都积累了一些经验，各有特长，也形成了各自的对外投资的机制。现在关键是怎么让双方企业尽量少用或不用这些经验去和对方拼争，而是相互借鉴合作，形成一种利益共享的机制。

　　“一带一路”的目标是宏大的，但中日企业可以先从一些具体项目，甚至一些小项目做起，通过在第三方项目上的合作积累经验，建立合作的信心。

　　亚洲是全球经济增长最快的地区，在全球产业链中举足轻重。亚洲的安全、政治结构也随着中国的崛起在发生变化。但是，相对于欧洲，亚洲的一体化仍然缺少以大国合作形成的中坚力量。根本改变亚洲的合作形态，改变亚洲在世界政治、经济和安全的未来结构中的地位，增进亚洲在全球和平进程中的作用，需要中日合作。

China's Belt and Road Leads to New Opportunities for Cooperation between China and Japan
China's Belt and Road Leads to New Opportunities for Cooperation between China and Japan
0

The “One Belt and One Road” is one of the main topics of the high-end dialogue between the Chinese and Japanese think tank media. Judging from the discussion of the participants of the Chinese and Japanese participants, it is clear that Japan has gone beyond the "One Belt and One Road" stage, but began to discuss what kind of approach or cooperation the Chinese and Japanese companies can use. This makes the author naturally think of the European coal-steel community in the early 1950s.

Today's EU started from the coal-steel community established in the early 1950s. This proposal was proposed by French Foreign Minister Schumann in 1950 and received a positive response from Germany. Former French Prime Minister Rocard describes the initial pursuit of the European integration founders. "They are not seeking friendship. They are just to stop the war."

Economic cooperation was the only viable way to pull France and Germany at that time. The start of the coal-steel community established a mechanism for the establishment of normal state relations between the two countries and laid the foundation for a unified regional cooperation framework, eventually eliminating future wars. The possibility.

In our discussions, some participants expressed the hope that similar relations between normal countries will gradually be established between China and Japan. Bai Yansong, the famous host of CCTV, believes that it is no longer possible for Sino-Japanese relations to return to the honeymoon period of the 1980s and 1990s. However, what he is looking forward to is "problems don't interfere with communication," especially high-level exchanges.

Both sides are aware that this does not mean that we must deliberately avoid contradictions and frictions. Instead, we must set up some mechanisms to resolve these issues and control their differences. Even if there are problems, we can maintain normal levels of contact. To achieve this, the European experience is that it begins with economic cooperation.

The cooperation between China and Japan in the "One Belt and One Road" framework is in the interest of both parties.

Today's economy between China and Japan is already deeply integrated. A survey conducted by the Japanese media a few years ago showed that an ordinary Japanese family found that almost all “Made in China” products were removed from their homes and found that they were almost “without possession”. If such investigations "move" to China, many Chinese families may also face "difficult to operate" after removing the "Made in Japan" element. Almost all mobile phones, home appliances and cars are inseparable from Japan's components.

In 2017, Japan's exports to China increased by 20.5% to nearly 15 trillion yen. Among them, the production of liquid crystal devices, chips, and semiconductor manufacturing equipment for smart phones is the fastest growing. Japan’s investment in China also exceeded 100 billion U.S. dollars. The trade volume between the two countries last year reached US$302.9 billion.

Just as Hu Zhengyue, vice president of China’s Public Diplomacy Association, said: “The high degree of integration of interests has become a ballast for bilateral relations between China and Japan.”

Of course, this only reflects the degree of bilateral economic integration. What is more important is that the economic integration of China and Japan will have an increasingly greater impact on Asia and the global economy. For example, it is difficult for us to say how many parts of an iPhone are made in China or Japan. To be sure, many similar products are produced by Sino-Japanese cooperation and exported to third-party markets. Both parties share profits in the industry chain and extend this chain to other countries. The form and depth of this cooperation are unprecedented.

There is also competition in the economies of China and Japan, especially as the manufacturing capabilities of China increase, the characteristics of competition become more and more significant. There have been many differences between the two sides.

Before the dialogue, the Chinese and Japanese governments reopened the "China-Japan High-level Economic Dialogue" on April 16 after eight years in a row. At the meeting, the Japanese side reiterated the issue of "protecting intellectual property rights" and "resolving overcapacity of steel production." Such disagreements will also affect future cooperation. However, for the Sino-Japanese economy that has already been deeply integrated, it is normal to have similar problems. It can be resolved through closer consultations.

Cooperation in competition is the main form of economic relations between China and Japan in the future.

Competition makes technological progress, and cooperation allows us to coexist. "One Belt and One Road" is to create a platform for cooperation so that more stakeholders can achieve development through cooperation. Cooperation is crucial for China and Japan, the two largest Asian economies. Because our cooperation will not only affect our own survival, but also affect the survival and development of more countries.

One of the reasons why the Japanese side will change its understanding of the “One Belt and One Road” is that China has surpassed Japan as Asia’s “boss” because of its increased strength and used unprecedented efforts to promote the “One Belt and One Road”; another reason is that the Japanese have seen this. The initiative is producing positive effects in many areas in Southeast Asia and Asia, and these areas have also been the destination for Japanese companies to invest.
Hu Zhengyue talks with the Japanese Foreign Ministry administrative officer, Jing Yan, and Hu Zhengyue talks with the Japanese Administrative Department’s Administrative Officer, Ian.

In a conversation with the delegation, the “second man” of the Japanese Foreign Ministry’s “government official” said in a conversation with the delegation that “Japan believes that China is a global economic power and has made contributions to the development of various countries in the region. It pays homage to this. China’s economic development is conducive to Japan, the Asian region, and the whole world, China’s development has brought its own development to all countries in the region.”

In particular, I'm not forgetting to state the Japanese official’s basic position: “We should promote the development of a win-win economic relationship and we should conduct fair and just transactions in accordance with international standards. Therefore, Japan can develop together with China’s 'One Belt and One Road' initiative.” However, He added that Japan has seen many places in Asia that the "One Belt and One Road" proposed by China has produced a good response.

Japan’s “Daily News” recently commented in an article that under the US Trump government’s trade protectionism policy, China is using a strong economic power as a background to attract multiple countries to participate in the “One Belt and One Road” and strive to build China's leading economic circle. The recent cooperation gesture shown by Japan shows that the influence of this initiative has reached a level that cannot be ignored.

In the past, China and Japan had competed in many projects involving third parties, sometimes even competing to the point where the other party was unable to make a profit or profit. Items obtained in this form often also cause problems during the process and are ultimately unfavorable to third parties. The “One Belt and One Road” offers the possibility of benefiting the three parties.

Over the years, Chinese and Japanese companies have accumulated some experience in promoting the infrastructure of some developing countries, each has its own specialties and formed its own mechanism for foreign investment. The key now is how to make both companies use as little or no experience as possible to compete with each other. Instead, they learn from each other and form a benefit-sharing mechanism.

The "One Belt, One Road" goal is ambitious, but Chinese and Japanese companies can begin with a few specific projects and even some small projects. Through the cooperation in third-party projects, they can build up their confidence in cooperation.

Asia is the fastest growing region in the world economy and plays an important role in the global industry chain. The security and political structure of Asia is also changing with the rise of China. However, relative to Europe, Asia's integration still lacks the backbone formed by the cooperation of big countries. To fundamentally change the Asian cooperation pattern, change Asia’s position in the future structure of world politics, economy, and security and enhance Asia’s role in the global peace process requires Sino-Japanese cooperation.

 

[Ang4MohTrump]

In this case Dotard MAGA again!

USA forces will stand to lose bases from Both Korea and Japan.

MAGA!

 

[syed putra]

In the first place 1b1r is a stupid name. Unlike say, the marshall plan.

 

[condom_loong]

In the first place 1b1r is a stupid name. Unlike say, the marshall plan.

It is a cute panda name. You no idea.