Chitchat First sign of rebellion against Trump?

[winnipegjets]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/us-agencies-trump-muzzling-science-1.3951472

 

[tanwahtiu]

Good for the whole world UArseA fighting no foreign enemies but their own people.

危机
UArseA in crisis withe whole world will benefit.

Get US dollars down worst than Indonesia rupiah the world rejoice.

This signify the fall of the British empire.

 

[tanwahtiu]

When u killed murdered natives to grab their land. With no intention to include natives to shared common wealth the time has come to these criminals to end.

World rejoice.

 

[Leongsam]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/us-agencies-trump-muzzling-science-1.3951472

Nothing to do with Trump.

 

[winnipegjets]

Nothing to do with Trump.

How about this?

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/26/the-...trump-come-from-his-own-aides-commentary.html

 

[Leongsam]

How about this?

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/26/the-...trump-come-from-his-own-aides-commentary.html

Surely you don't believe everything you read especially from a CNBC.

I would like to think that someone who is intelligent enough to be in this forum does not swallow propaganda hook line and sinker.

Take that stuff with a pinch of salt. There will always be dissenters in any party or organisation for a variety of reasons. Trump most certainly has his detractors but as long as they cannot hinder to his goal of making america great again I would just treat them as background noise.

I too believe that Trump should not have made public his anger over the crowd size issue. He painted a huge target on his own forehead for the liberal press.

However the fact remains that the 360 image published by CNN does not match the crowd size comparison image that went viral.

Take a look for yourself :

http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

vs

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/20/p...rack-obama-inauguration-crowd-size/index.html

I'm not surprised Trump is angry. I would be too.

 

[winnipegjets]

Surely you don't believe everything you read especially from a CNBC.

I would like to think that someone who is intelligent enough to be in this forum does not swallow propaganda hook line and sinker.

Take that stuff with a pinch of salt. There will always be dissenters in any party or organisation for a variety of reasons. Trump most certainly has his detractors but as long as they cannot hinder to his goal of making america great again I would just treat them as background noise.

I too believe that Trump should not have made public his anger over the crowd size issue. He painted a huge target on his own forehead for the liberal press.

However the fact remains that the 360 image published by CNN does not match the crowd size comparison image that went viral.

Take a look for yourself :

http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

vs

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/20/p...rack-obama-inauguration-crowd-size/index.html

I'm not surprised Trump is angry. I would be too.

Briebart vs CNBC, I will choose the latter.

 

[Leongsam]

Briebart vs CNBC, I will choose the latter.

To be honest I would not believe either. I always knew that the mainstream press was run by liberals but I did not realise they were all beholden to the Hillary camp. It was a real eye opener.

Remove the spin from both ends of the spectrum. The truth is always buried in the middle ground. The BBC used to be so impartial it bordered on treason. Sadly they too have gone down the tubes when it comes to reporting the news.

NEWS organisations are supposed to report what happened and what was said while allowing listeners/readers/viewers to pass their own judgements.

Sadly such organisations don't exist anymore.

 

[nayr69sg]

To be honest I would not believe either. I always knew that the mainstream press was run by liberals but I did not realise they were all beholden to the Hillary camp. It was a real eye opener.

Remove the spin from both ends of the spectrum. The truth is always buried in the middle ground. The BBC used to be so impartial it bordered on treason. Sadly they too have gone down the tubes when it comes to reporting the news.

NEWS organisations are supposed to report what happened and what was said while allowing listeners/readers/viewers to pass their own judgements.

Sadly such organisations don't exist anymore.

It's all about money and funding. News organizations used to make lots of money from their advertising etc. These days they are money losing operations that are probably sustained by some kind of impartial funding/cash infusion etc.

If you want impartial reporting on politicians, that is never going to happen. EVER.

 

[Leongsam]

It's all about money and funding. News organizations used to make lots of money from their advertising etc. These days they are money losing operations that are probably sustained by some kind of impartial funding/cash infusion etc.

If you want impartial reporting on politicians, that is never going to happen. EVER.

We all know who is behind the lefties. It the Soros's of the world who have a vested interest in what used to be the status quo when the democrats were in charge.

Soros loves currency manipulation. He's the master of the game so the thought Trump trying to put a spanner in his works is driving him to distraction.

 

[virus]

dont b silly crowd size is related to the manhood. obama, black man. confirm is big n schlong. fuckface, orange man, confirmed is weird small. ok maybe XXsmall.

matches crowd size.