• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Workers Party Exposed as Useless Opposition

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
18,092
Points
113
TISG lashes out in response to NCMP Daniel Goh’s condemnation

August 9, 2016 • By Ariffin Sha

“TISG crossed the line for me into endorsing tasteless xenophobia and linking it to our electoral democracy. It is sensational, senseless and nonsensical. Sad.”

– NCMP Daniel Goh

Workers’ Party’s Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Daniel Goh denounced The Independent Singapore’s (TISG) journalistic standards, or lack thereof, in no uncertain terms on his Facebook Page yesterday.


In particular, he found the exercise of editorial discretion to place a “tasteless and xenophobic” comment from a “random forum user” as a caption for an article “sensational, senseless and sad.” The comment in question said that it was the influx of foreigners which caused 3 SMRT workers to be diagnosed with Tuberculosis.

In response to the post, TISG launched a diatribe. TISG – currently fronted by Lead Editor Ravi Philemon, who stood as a candidate in the last General Elections – accused NCMP Goh of wanting to score ‘political points’. It also chided him for choosing not to engage with them directly as he ran the risk of losing their “one million unique viewers” directly.

The publication went as far as to argue that NCMP Goh was “faking humbleness.”

At various points in the thread, NCMP Goh did take pains to point out the contradictions in TISG’s retort – like how they accused him of scoring political points while saying that it was his loss if he stops supporting TISG.

“I am very surprised that TISG would bother with a FB post of 100+ likes critical of it. I am sure that there is a lot more important news to work on than to engage with me on this lonely thread… Why so sensitive?” NCMP Goh riposted.

A Singaporean Journalist, Mr Bhavan Jaipragas, noted that he had written in to Mr Philemon previously about a similar article. He called out Mr Philemon and TISG in a comment on the same thread, too.

13933348_120300000057363009_1961409967_n

“This spiral to the lowest common denominator of goading local against foreigners just for clicks makes me think lesser of you and everyone associated with TISG,” Mr Jaipragas submitted.

On that occasion, Mr Philemon mentioned that Mr Bhavan should “feel free to criticise (the article) publicly.” He also shifted the blame to an ‘anonymous contributor.’

10341884_10152782483554141_1990308685555212095_n
Mr Ravi Philemon, Lead Editor at TISG

editors-kumaran-ravi-the-independent-singapore

Mr Philemon defended TISG by mentioning how TISG has bucked the trend by growing without doing what ‘STOMP’ and ‘ASS (All Singapore Stuff)’ do. That is, presumably, in reference to the 2 aforementioned sites’ fondness for sensationalism and tabloid journalism. The same charges which NCMP Goh attributed to TISG.

He shared that government and related agencies view TISG as “a useful loudhailer.” A point which Mr Jaipragas urged Mr Philemon to shed more light on. In a bizzare conclusion, Mr Philemon chastised Mr Japiragas for airing his criticism publicly – the exact same criticism that he once encouraged.

Mr Philemon’s exchanges with NCMP Goh and Mr Jaipragas does seem to suggest a U-turn, or at the very least, some inconsistency, in TISG’s position on the freedom to criticize. Considering the overzealous manner in which he replied to the criticisms of TISG, it would most certainly be a Herculean task for Mr Philemon and co. to pin the blame on anonymous contributors, and the like, anymore.

http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/blo...e-to-ncmp-daniel-gohs-remarks-on-its-article/
 
As i have said many times before WP, is a fake oppo. Now you believe me? the shit times and SPH have the lowest standards of journalism in the world, and here a WP NCMP is criticizing an independent singapore media instead of SPH? hahahah. what a joke. better for daniel goh to ask SHit Times why they did not break the story on the train cracks and train being shipped all the way back to China, and instead another independent news outlet Factwire did.
 
Nothing to "expose"... year after year their voters find them to be ineffectual in parliament.

GE2020 will see them off

Byeee co-drivers..
 
how can WP be useful when papigs are bent on fixing them at every turn???????????????


Frido cannot fight off 81 Golums.......& a horde of civil serpents

In this case, the WP's daniel goh volunteered to fix the alternate media for the PAP. wow, what a co-operative oppo.
 
In this case, the WP's daniel goh volunteered to fix the alternate media for the PAP. wow, what a co-operative oppo.

I get it. This guy wants to sound moderate and 'sensible' to middle ground voters. But last year has demonstrated Pap's move to cover the middle ground very effectively. Echoing Pap's rhetoric will not gain WP any brownie points from voters. In fact it will have an inverse effect

WP needs a new strategy if they still want to relevant in local politics
 
I get it. This guy wants to sound moderate and 'sensible' to middle ground voters. But last year has demonstrated Pap's move to cover the middle ground very effectively. Echoing Pap's rhetoric will not gain WP any brownie points from voters. In fact it will have an inverse effect

WP needs a new strategy if they still want to relevant in local politics

Its PAP Lite, it doesn't care about relevance.
 
Daniel goh seems like a nice guy and i strongly recommend he does some self-reflecting. When you can't be the voice of ordinary Singaporeans in Parliament they will turn to the internet to vent.

Are you being fair when you attack The independent?

Or is it an indication of your party's performance?
 
As i have said many times before WP, is a fake oppo. Now you believe me? the shit times and SPH have the lowest standards of journalism in the world, and here a WP NCMP is criticizing an independent singapore media instead of SPH? hahahah. what a joke. better for daniel goh to ask SHit Times why they did not break the story on the train cracks and train being shipped all the way back to China, and instead another independent news outlet Factwire did.

Daniel goh seems like a nice guy and i strongly recommend he does some self-reflecting. When you can't be the voice of ordinary Singaporeans in Parliament they will turn to the internet to vent.

Are you being fair when you attack The independent?

Or is it an indication of your party's performance?

Ridiculous! Xenophobia and nationalism belongs to the likes of Singapore First Party and NSP. WP does not endorse xenophobia. If they did, they would end up performing poorly like the other 2 parties. Imagine you tell your foreigner spouse you voting for the neo nazis, what you think she will say? "Papsmearer / Rogue Trader, you silly man! What good had your countrymen done for you? Think. Think hard and tell me one good thing they did." I did and I realize it was the PAP and they are truly the best. :)
 
Daniel goh seems like a nice guy and i strongly recommend he does some self-reflecting. When you can't be the voice of ordinary Singaporeans in Parliament they will turn to the internet to vent.

Are you being fair when you attack The independent?

Or is it an indication of your party's performance?

Obviously he is not a nice guy, he is just another PAP asshole.
 
Back
Top