Shameless British still retain their monarchy but destroued others...

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
37,095
Points
113
Noticed that the shameless bastard British criminal drug trafficker still retained their monarchy whereas they went round the world to dismantle and destroyed others.

Of course, drug trafficking biz are easy and big money making trade, illegal some more, and with so much drug money they can even retain rats monarchy, or any fuck shitskin King and Queen monarchy system, for long time.

Fucking evil bastard British race of mankind history.


http://www.royal.gov.uk/

http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/HistoryoftheMonarchy.aspx


Queen Victoria reigned for 63 years and seven months, longer than any other British monarch. Find out more about her life and reign in this section.
 
The British Monarchy brings in more tourist dollars than the Lee dynasty.
 
Fucking evil bastard British race of mankind history.
Yes, the British were, and still are, malicious hypocrites; but to be fair, their victims were also in the wrong for many other things, to say the least.


Queen Victoria reigned for 63 years and seven months, longer than any other British monarch.
Elizabeth II surpassed her in September 2015 (last year):
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_monarchs_in_Britain_by_length_of_reign#Overall
 
Victims in the wrong?

You fucking shitskin?

Go read of their unequal treaties with China?

This was a trade war and later with unequal treaty. They want you to sign unequal treaty allow drug trade in China? Fuck them.

Let this happened to the British and China was the aggressor and you tell me the fuck British are victims are in the wrong?






Yes, the British were, and still are, malicious hypocrites; but to be fair, their victims were also in the wrong for many other things, to say the least.



Elizabeth II surpassed her in September 2015 (last year):
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_monarchs_in_Britain_by_length_of_reign#Overall
 
Victims in the wrong?

You fucking shitskin?

Go read of their unequal treaties with China?

This was a trade war and later with unequal treaty. They want you to sign unequal treaty allow drug trade in China? Fuck them.

Let this happened to the British and China was the aggressor and you tell me the fuck British are victims are in the wrong?

The unequal treaties was imposed on the Manchurian dynasty. If the chinks believed in themselves and did not support a foreign dynasty this would not have happened. China being dominated by Manchurian or ang mor does not matter..all foreigners anyway..chinks have no pride by letting themselves ruled by a foreign barbarian tribe have only themselves to blame. N the poms gave the singkies the Lee Dynasty n last i check Had 70 % ...so wats the problem...?
 
Victims in the wrong?

You fucking shitskin?

Go read of their unequal treaties with China?

This was a trade war and later with unequal treaty. They want you to sign unequal treaty allow drug trade in China? Fuck them.

Let this happened to the British and China was the aggressor and you tell me the fuck British are victims are in the wrong?


during the 1930s and 1940s, the Chinese Nationalist government had abrogated most of the unequal treaties, they ended the treaty ports, extraterritoriality and tariff autonomy. few unequal treaties outlasted ww2. only the Soviet Union out of all the foreign countries held firmly to the terms of the unequal treaties and didn't surrender the territories of Outer Manchuria and 64 Villages East of the River back to China. the Soviet Union also coerced the Nationalist government to give Outer Mongolia independence in 1946. instead of the British obsession, why don't you fuck the Russians too ?
 
The unequal treaties was imposed on the Manchurian dynasty. If the chinks believed in themselves and did not support a foreign dynasty this would not have happened. China being dominated by Manchurian or ang mor does not matter..all foreigners anyway..chinks have no pride by letting themselves ruled by a foreign barbarian tribe have only themselves to blame. N the poms gave the singkies the Lee Dynasty n last i check Had 70 % ...so wats the problem...?

Lots of chinese dogs around to kiss the asses of non chinese. Chinese dog syndrome is quite big.
 
Under the Manchurian dynasty Chinese prosperous for 200 years. If you want China go conquered it and make them prosperous but not turned it into a poor nation.

The fucking Poms destroyed Chinese and Asia for 150 years to be a poor nation. This is the problem.

This was a illegal drug trade against many nations in North Asia. Not one nations was brought down but 2, India, was brought down by the fucking Poms using the opium drug trade. Not a single opium was grown/ cultivated/ harvested in England soil but in India. Using India land to grow opium to export to China? What the fuck is this evil white trash doing?



Compare to your descendant the fucking Pom children lived a quality life style, plenty of drug money to spend, compare to Chinese become poor peasants and poor nation.

That's the problem. You have any problem? Does Pap turned Singapore into a poor nation?





The unequal treaties was imposed on the Manchurian dynasty. If the chinks believed in themselves and did not support a foreign dynasty this would not have happened. China being dominated by Manchurian or ang mor does not matter..all foreigners anyway..chinks have no pride by letting themselves ruled by a foreign barbarian tribe have only themselves to blame. N the poms gave the singkies the Lee Dynasty n last i check Had 70 % ...so wats the problem...?
 
Not yet fuck the Russian. When the British are forced to apologize to China the Russian will followed like an obedient dog.

recommended reading Modern History of China - publisher Canfonian Pte Ltd, a Singapore base company.



during the 1930s and 1940s, the Chinese Nationalist government had abrogated most of the unequal treaties, they ended the treaty ports, extraterritoriality and tariff autonomy. few unequal treaties outlasted ww2. only the Soviet Union out of all the foreign countries held firmly to the terms of the unequal treaties and didn't surrender the territories of Outer Manchuria and 64 Villages East of the River back to China. the Soviet Union also coerced the Nationalist government to give Outer Mongolia independence in 1946. instead of the British obsession, why don't you fuck the Russians too ?
 
Last edited:
The unequal treaties was imposed on the Manchurian dynasty. If the chinks believed in themselves and did not support a foreign dynasty this would not have happened. China being dominated by Manchurian or ang mor does not matter..all foreigners anyway..chinks have no pride by letting themselves ruled by a foreign barbarian tribe have only themselves to blame. N the poms gave the singkies the Lee Dynasty n last i check Had 70 % ...so wats the problem...?


the Qing armies conquered China, the Hans were forced to submit to their rule. similarly, the Chinese Communist armies conquered China, whether it was the free will of the Chinese people to support the Communists back then is a matter of debate. the Lee Dynasty didn't employ military power but conducted the elections in such an unfair manner in favor of them, that is maybe equivalent to election fraud. it is not the true free will and support of the people in all 3 cases.
 
well argued bro.

PAP are no better than the British ... 老狗贼。

The bankrupt British and American need money to build their country and turned into drug trade, evil money, and targeted a wealthy nation of 300 million people.
There was a war between British and American themselves. a colonized US want to free from their evil British and both went bankrupt in 1700s period.

That's the different.


the Qing armies conquered China, the Hans were forced to submit to their rule. similarly, the Chinese Communist armies conquered China, whether it was the free will of the Chinese people to support the Communists back then is a matter of debate. the Lee Dynasty didn't employ military power but conducted the elections in such an unfair manner in favor of them, that is maybe equivalent to election fraud. it is not the true free will and support of the people in all 3 cases.
 
Last edited:
they were glad to support the manchus,,,n chinks made up a huge percentage of the qing armies...if tat is not collaboration..i don't know wat is

the Qing armies conquered China, the Hans were forced to submit to their rule. similarly, the Chinese Communist armies conquered China, whether it was the free will of the Chinese people to support the Communists back then is a matter of debate. the Lee Dynasty didn't employ military power but conducted the elections in such an unfair manner in favor of them, that is maybe equivalent to election fraud. it is not the true free will and support of the people in all 3 cases.
 
Not yet to fuck the Russian. When the British are forced to apologize to China the Russian will followed like an obedient dog.

recommended reading Modern History of China - publisher Canfonian Pte Ltd, a Singapore base company.


the Soviet Russians were the greater evil to China compared to the British. the PRC is friendly with the British back then and now. the United Kingdom is the first major western nation to recognize the PRC in 1950. last year, the British gave China leader Xi Jinping the Emperor welcome ceremony when he visited London. ;)
 
the Russian came to attack China only after the British turned China into a poor nation. A poor nation is a weak nation and an easy target for all sort of bullies and invasion.

After they blatantly destroyed China and in 1950 do they recognised China is a bit too late?

the Soviet Russians were the greater evil to China compared to the British. the PRC is friendly with the British back then and now. the United Kingdom is the first major western nation to recognize the PRC in 1950. last year, the British gave China leader Xi Jinping the Emperor welcome ceremony when he visited London last year. ;)
 
the Russian came to attack China only after the British turned China into a poor nation. A poor nation is a weak nation and an easy target for all sort of bullies and invasion.

After they blatantly destroyed China and in 1950 do they recognised China is a bit too late?


it is said the Soviet GRU, Chinese Communists and Japanese secret service colluded to stage the Marco Polo Bridge incident, which started the 2nd Sino-Japanese war in 1937. it remains the biggest unsolved mystery of the Sino-Japanese conflicts in the 1930s.
 
For dessert I would like to have a Peking Pineapple in blonde flavour ...............

[video=youtube;0PuGvMZW1h4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PuGvMZW1h4[/video]
 
the Soviet Russians were the greater evil to China compared to the British. the PRC is friendly with the British back then and now. the United Kingdom is the first major western nation to recognize the PRC in 1950. last year, the British gave China leader Xi Jinping the Emperor welcome ceremony when he visited London. ;)

Yes, you are right...but then the truth of the matter is also the bloody pommies brits are on the decline now, very very sway with lots of jobless and lots of economic problems due to their spendthrift ways of the past, wasting away the fortunes the robber barons had stolen from China, India, African and Latin American peoples.....

If China is now still plagued by internal political troubles or weak economies, wouldn't the pommy marggie had told Teng Xiao Ping in 1996....hey, I think we still need hong kong to do trade. Let's have another lease on hong kong, new territories and maybe even parts of Kwangtung for the next 200 years?.....the pommies are still great actors on the world stage....:eek::eek:
 
Monarchies are not entitled to anything. If their kings and rulers are not capable of defending the country and their thrones, then they don't deserve to remain as royalty. It's been that way since the beginning of time. The Brits don't owe you shit.
 
Back
Top