No longer a tiger, Singapore’s new economy

krafty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
13,736
Points
113
Lower growth broadly means lower profits, and fewer, tougher opportunities for business expansion. This translates to lower bonuses, fewer jobs as well as potential layoffs.

For now a labour crunch and anti-immigration measures will cushion local jobs but for student job seekers and those outside of skilled brackets, breaking into the job market will not be easy. Dramatic increases in salaries and packages are also going to be hard to come by.

However, for many ordinary people there are more than a few silver linings to a slow growth economy. Interest rates are likely to remain low, easing pressure on home owners. Cooling in the housing market will favour young people looking to get on the property ladder.

Inflation is likely to stay low so while we won’t be seeing our salaries rise dramatically, we also shouldn’t have to contend with painful price increases.

The other day I was helping a friend look for office space in the much sought-after Club Street area and I was surprised by prices that according to real estate agents, had reduced substantially over the past two years. For entrepreneurs looking for start-up space, this is good news.

At the very least, this new normal allows us to catch our breath, take stock and consider what sort of an economy and therefore what sort of a society we want to be. The government itself has said the next few years will be a period of measured restructuring and rebalancing.

But this doesn’t quite account for the fact that growth is a defining feature of our nation. The ability to deliver higher and higher living standards, more opportunities and rising wages is part of Singapore’s essential social contact.

Now we find ourselves confronting a future as a small, mature developed economy with moderate growth; think Denmark, New Zealand or Ireland. So should we begin to expect the same sort of democracy and welfare protection? Or are going to fight for our growth? Given global constraints and an ageing population, that would be quite a fight.

Our geographic location, strong education base and cash reserves give us a chance to keep on a growth trajectory even in adverse circumstances. But for real growth, we would need to either rapidly develop an innovative and globally competitive private sector out of the shadow of state-linked corporates.

In the past influxes of new Singaporeans with their labour and capital have allowed us to beat a low population growth rate but politically this may no longer be an option.

In terms of fighting to maintain high growth, none of the options are easy and they would all entail a breach of the former status quo but will this bring change to another defining aspect of the Singapore story — our social and political systems?

An era of low growth and calculated rebalancing would be unprecedented for Singapore. Singapore’s nature, its core DNA is as an entrepot, a place of opportunity, a place to make fortunes.

Globally our country’s name is a synonym for growth and forward momentum so this isn’t something we can just give up. So if our GDP isn’t rising fast, that growth will have to come from elsewhere.

Somehow we need to grow. Or we wouldn’t be Singapore.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/o...r-singapores-new-economy#sthash.1iyOvPl5.dpuf
 
i think the writer has a problem with sinkieland, somemore she is ah neh, but she is right in her observation. hope she dun like that say anymore cos' pap need to justify pay increment soon, if not there will be corruption woh...:eek::D
 
No country can grow forever.
 
Our geographic location, strong education base and cash reserves give us a chance to keep on a growth trajectory even in adverse circumstances. But for real growth, we would need to either rapidly develop an innovative and globally competitive private sector out of the shadow of state-linked corporates.
 
it is now a rat economy ie govt taxes everything plus involve in biz competing with pte sector!! datz Y everything is so expensive becos it is taxes upon taxes,,,,,,,,,, remember some asses said GST is to help the poor? my foot!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Our geographic location, strong education base and cash reserves give us a chance to keep on a growth trajectory even in adverse circumstances. But for real growth, we would need to either rapidly develop an innovative and globally competitive private sector out of the shadow of state-linked corporates.

take away cpf still got cash reserve??? why persecute Roy Ngerng for asking right questions???
 
As long as the PAP is in power they will continue demanding all those high salaries, directorships, part time jobs in all those GLCs,....

PAP = parasites & a drag on the economy because you can't have so many civil servant multi-millionaire in the system.
 
We just need to find another engine of growth, the porn industry is a potential, exotic Malay, Chinese, Indian n Eurasian gals, will appeal to different tastes. I have confidence it will make us the porn center of SEA. Japan disadvantage is that not a lot ppl understand the language and the wierd censorship regulation.
 
Gee, sounds like the right time to get 4 million indians and filipinos in.....
 
LEEgalize medicinal marijuana , porn and happy endings at all massage parlors :D



 
it is now a rat economy ie govt taxes everything plus involve in biz competing with pte sector!! datz Y everything is so expensive becos it is taxes upon taxes,,,,,,,,,, remember some asses said GST is to help the poor? my foot!!!!!!!!!!!

GOVERNMENT TAXES EVERYTHING..... I will follow up with these few cases where they have gone overboard, irrational and at some point, inhumane.

1. Asking teachers to pay parking charges for their cars parked in school while staying back to help weaker students with their school work. Probably the only country in the world to charge their teachers doing public service. Another first for Singapore.

2. Charging a $3 fee for making Medisave deduction when you visit polyclinic to get your regular medication for the 3 major chronic illness ( high cholesterol, high blood pressure and diabetes )
This charge is removed as it is seen as inhumane to make money on every transactions.

3. Levying a $120 charge for the poor uncle who sells tissue in the streets irregardless whether he is a double amputee or not.

Above charges is to make up for the shortfall in Estate Duties tax collection which they conveniently remove to help and favour the rich and the Elite.

So now you see which side does the Government lean to.

Many thanks to the 69.9.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top