Honeytrap. Should I do it?

[Claire]

good morning sister claire. can't believe you're falling in love when you're supposed to be the empowered sith lady of men's heartbreaks. what happened between loathing at first, getting in bed after being sweet-talked, going steady yet keeping guard of your feelings (then) and now? you're beginning to give and expect 100% for a non-committed relationship, and your spy network is telling you that he's doing otherwise? he's going to stray, and nothing in his portfolio of conquest so far is changing that pattern. how can you be so naive if you profess to be a player yourself to "trust" him? "tryst" instead of "trust" is in the vocabulary of serial players. enjoy the tryst and thrust while they lasted. this chap thrives on thrills and practising the art of two- if not three-timing. the adrenaline rush of getting away with it is more sextisfying than pounding several women in bed.

no honey trap. time for pulling out the venus fly trap. and crush the worm in it. :p

View attachment 24925

Good morning Eat, my elder brother. I am really getting fond of you. No No, don't get me wrong, NOT that the type that you are thinking but more as an elder sibling

Reading your post in the train now (~ and yes, I managed to get a seat today ~) I am also in love with the way you had put your message across. Simply awesome and objective advice!

However, I am not sure he is what you have asserted, or perhaps what I write about him. What he actually is can be misinterpreted due to imperfection in one-dimensional communication in a forum like this. Sue did think he is a great guy as well after meeting him, save that she is now more cautious about men than before after her horrifying honeytrap ordeal.

Your advice seems to imply that all men who had a "serial" past cannot be trusted. I agree to a certain extent but it can't be an universal principle of logic. Perhaps he has not found the right one who he can "gel" with, or perhaps he is as "picky" as me, wanting to settle for the best and the right one.

Back to the "Honeytrap" idea. Assuming that you pass the test with flying colours, would you be offended if you subsequently discover that your spouse/partner is behind it?

It worries me as I am more inclined to decide on this step ahead, for now at least.

Will be back here later to get your views once I get some work done in office today.

PS : I "hate" to say this, you are getting me "addicted" to you. I simply love your quintessential style of expression .

 

[Ash007]

Dear Claire,
its almost noon here. And how is your day so far? I'll go straight to the point.
I honestly don't think honeytrapping is a good idea. It shows a lack of faith you have in him at all. Have you not discussed about monogamous relationship with him?
It is very normal for guys to continue seeking, if he thinks that would increase his chance of finding a partner to settle down eventually. With my wife, she was ok with me talking to other female colleague/friends. Even now I still talk to a lot of females and she is still fine, but I also give her the rights to do the same as well with male friends. Are you feeling "jealousy"? That is why you are considering this? Even if he fell for it, what does it mean? If you guys never discussed if this line can/can't be cross he would assumed its fine.

Good morning Eat, my elder brother. I am really getting fond of you. No No, don't get me wrong, NOT that the type that you are thinking but more as an elder sibling

Reading your post in the train now (~ and yes, I managed to get a seat today ~) I am also in love with the way you had put your message across. Simply awesome and objective advice!

However, I am not sure he is what you have asserted, or perhaps what I write about him. What he actually is can be misinterpreted due to imperfection in one-dimensional communication in a forum like this. Sue did think he is a great guy as well after meeting him, save that she is now more cautious about men than before after her horrifying honeytrap ordeal.

Your advice seems to imply that all men who had a "serial" past cannot be trusted. I agree to a certain extent but it can't be an universal principle of logic. Perhaps he has not found the right one who he can "gel" with, or perhaps he is as "picky" as me, wanting to settle for the best and the right one.

Back to the "Honeytrap" idea. Assuming that you pass the test with flying colours, would you be offended if you subsequently discover that your spouse/partner is behind it?

It worries me as I am more inclined to decide on this step ahead, for now at least.

Will be back here later to get your views once I get some work done in office today.

PS : I "hate" to say this, you are getting me "addicted" to you. I simply love your quintessential style of expression .

 

[Wunderfool]

Dear Claire,
its almost noon here. And how is your day so far? I'll go straight to the point.
I honestly don't think honeytrapping is a good idea. It shows a lack of faith you have in him at all. Have you not discussed about monogamous relationship with him?
It is very normal for guys to continue seeking, if he thinks that would increase his chance of finding a partner to settle down eventually. With my wife, she was ok with me talking to other female colleague/friends. Even now I still talk to a lot of females and she is still fine, but I also give her the rights to do the same as well with male friends. Are you feeling "jealousy"? That is why you are considering this? Even if he fell for it, what does it mean? If you guys never discussed if this line can/can't be cross he would assumed its fine.

Go do it. You will never be able to remove the doubts in your heart if you don't find out the truth.

 

[CABcommander]

so many fucktards here thought they are talking to some chick. damn pathetic these no life fuckers

where the fuck are the mods? should put all Claire threads in the rubbish heap :oIo:

 

[Charlie99]

Good morning to you, whereas it is past dinner time here.

You will have to find an excuse to avoid intimacy, such as "yeast infection", or ??

"Charlie" is simply my logon name.

You may wish to consider calling me "Toronto Guy" or "King Kong" or "Colonel"

 

[eatshitndie]

Back to the "Honeytrap" idea. Assuming that you pass the test with flying colours, would you be offended if you subsequently discover that your spouse/partner is behind it?

there's no perfection in our human condition. we are as fallible as the most powerful sith lord (this week is the launch of a star whores movie, forgive my ludicrous pun). i'm resigned to the stark but realistic prospect that even those closest to us may inadvertently kill us, or worse harbor the intent to destroy in order to rise at our expense. am i ranting gunganish? perhaps, as i'm weakened and my frail body is fighting back. my mind is preoccupied with dealing with this phantom menace. and taking offense at those who inadvertently weaken my condition is an unproductive use of my force energy. i would rather focus on my ritual and healing in order to gain clarity of mind and precision in purpose. it is after all myself who is fallible and compromised, not the other party or others.

you see, my good friend and apprentice transferred his weaknesses and an unknown microscopic force to me thinking i have the immunity and omnipotence of lord vitiate. this was during the ritualistic celebration of the twinkling tree triumvirate three twilight tides into the winter solstice two nights ago. practitioner, apprentice, and tree - triumvirate. all magninamity and forgiveness for now are said and done. when i fully recover, i will cut the apprentice down.......such is the way of the dark side......with my brand new toilet plunger and brush - newest weapon in my personal arsenal. :p

 

[Froggy]

so many fucktards here thought they are talking to some chick. damn pathetic these no life fuckers

where the fuck are the mods? should put all Claire threads in the rubbish heap :oIo:

The boys just wanna have their moment.

 

[wikiphile]

The boys just wanna have their moment.

Her 'ding dongs' brings all the boys to the yard,
And they're like
It's better than yours,
Damn right it's better than yours,

 

[syed putra]

honey trap mus be invented by women...dey get paid...to screw ur boyfriend...

and girlfriend get to see the action. and if cannot tahan, join in. anything to make the man happy

 

[Claire]

there's no perfection in our human condition. we are as fallible as the most powerful sith lord (this week is the launch of a star whores movie, forgive my ludicrous pun). i'm resigned to the stark but realistic prospect that even those closest to us may inadvertently kill us, or worse harbor the intent to destroy in order to rise at our expense. am i ranting gunganish? perhaps, as i'm weakened and my frail body is fighting back. my mind is preoccupied with dealing with this phantom menace. and taking offense at those who inadvertently weaken my condition is an unproductive use of my force energy. i would rather focus on my ritual and healing in order to gain clarity of mind and precision in purpose. it is after all myself who is fallible and compromised, not the other party or others.

you see, my good friend and apprentice transferred his weaknesses and an unknown microscopic force to me thinking i have the immunity and omnipotence of lord vitiate. this was during the ritualistic celebration of the twinkling tree triumvirate three twilight tides into the winter solstice two nights ago. practitioner, apprentice, and tree - triumvirate. all magninamity and forgiveness for now are said and done. when i fully recover, i will cut the apprentice down.......such is the way of the dark side......with my brand new toilet plunger and brush - newest weapon in my personal arsenal. :p

Hello Elder Bro Eat, I read your post and I am momentarily lost in your world of fiction. I am beginning to feel intellectually inferior, having the disability to decipher your passage :(

 

[Claire]

Go do it. You will never be able to remove the doubts in your heart if you don't find out the truth.

Morning Wunder! Glad to see you here again. I am confused about your view on Honeytrapping. So, is that a Yes or No?

 

[Claire]

Good morning to you, whereas it is past dinner time here.

You will have to find an excuse to avoid intimacy, such as "yeast infection", or ??

"Charlie" is simply my logon name.

You may wish to consider calling me "Toronto Guy" or "King Kong" or "Colonel"

Hello Charlie, those names you suggested are too "dry" and lack "warmth". I am a die hard romantic. I do prefer Charles as it gives me more "security", "depth" and makes me feel more princess-like. I do cherish such imagination, though please don't misinterpret my simple intention .

"Yeast"??? I never had before. I am not sure how I can fake it.

 

[Claire]

Dear Claire,
its almost noon here. And how is your day so far? I'll go straight to the point.
I honestly don't think honeytrapping is a good idea. It shows a lack of faith you have in him at all. Have you not discussed about monogamous relationship with him?
It is very normal for guys to continue seeking, if he thinks that would increase his chance of finding a partner to settle down eventually. With my wife, she was ok with me talking to other female colleague/friends. Even now I still talk to a lot of females and she is still fine, but I also give her the rights to do the same as well with male friends. Are you feeling "jealousy"? That is why you are considering this? Even if he fell for it, what does it mean? If you guys never discussed if this line can/can't be cross he would assumed its fine.

Good morning Ash (or afternoon to you). Perhaps, I should be more "Singli-fied" and practise my dialect here ~ 你好，Jiap Pa Bway?

Reading your advice, it seems that there is a better alternative to Honeytrapping or restricting intimacy (as suggested by Charles).

Don't get me wrong. I am perfectly fine with him having female friends. I do have very close male friends too. We do give each other "space". Maybe, perhaps too much.

Your suggestion of a "heart to heart" talk is worth considering, but what if I am misled by him. He can be as sweet as a vial of rose oil when we communicate.

Jealousy? I supposed I am (I hate to admit, but I don't think I can deny).

By the way, I "tested" him just now (via Whatsapp) and asked him where he had lunch yesterday. He said he met up with his ex at Wah Lok for lunch.

I am pleasantly happy

 

[Ash007]

Good morning Ash (or afternoon to you). Perhaps, I should be more "Singli-fied" and practise my dialect here ~ 你好，Jiap Pa Bway?

Reading your advice, it seems that there is a better alternative to Honeytrapping or restricting intimacy (as suggested by Charles).

Don't get me wrong. I am perfectly fine with him having female friends. I do have very close male friends too. We do give each other "space". Maybe, perhaps too much.

Your suggestion of a "heart to heart" talk is worth considering, but what if I am misled by him. He can be as sweet as a vial of rose oil when we communicate.

Jealousy? I supposed I am (I hate to admit, but I don't think I can deny).

By the way, I "tested" him just now (via Whatsapp) and asked him where he had lunch yesterday. He said he met up with his ex at Wah Lok for lunch.

I am pleasantly happy

Trust works both ways. You must give and also take. That is why its called building a relationship. Especially after the honeymoon period of bonking each other mad.
You'll know if he cheats outside. But better to make it known its something you cannot accept early on. Restricting/honeypotting is some really bad advice that women come up with. It not only destroy trust but puts the relationship in an unstable footing. How can you be sure that even if he passed this time he won't later on in life? Are you gonna keep sending in honeypots for him all the time?

 

[Claire]

Trust works both ways. You must give and also take. That is why its called building a relationship. Especially after the honeymoon period of bonking each other mad.
You'll know if he cheats outside. But better to make it known its something you cannot accept early on. Restricting/honeypotting is some really bad advice that women come up with. It not only destroy trust but puts the relationship in an unstable footing. How can you be sure that even if he passed this time he won't later on in life? Are you gonna keep sending in honeypots for him all the time?

Thank you very much Ash. Your advice will be heeded once I get an opportunity to have a good talk with him .

Sue just whatsapped me not so long ago and I asked if I am interested in employing the Honeytrapper. Cost is about $500 and it seems that the Honeytrapper can "tape" the conversation and play back for me too. I said No thanks in the meantime. She laughed and said "Hope you don't regret".

PS : Honeytrapping not Honeypotting

 

[krafty]

Thank you very much Ash. Your advice will be heeded once I get an opportunity to have a good talk with him .

Sue just whatsapped me not so long ago and I asked if I am interested in employing the Honeytrapper. Cost is about $500 and it seems that the Honeytrapper can "tape" the conversation and play back for me too. I said No thanks in the meantime. She laughed and said "Hope you don't regret".

PS : Honeytrapping not Honeypotting

claire, can you honey trap me, i am in love with you so i won't betray you. kiss kiss, kraft:o

 

[yahoo55]

Trust works both ways. You must give and also take. That is why its called building a relationship. Especially after the honeymoon period of bonking each other mad.
You'll know if he cheats outside. But better to make it known its something you cannot accept early on. Restricting/honeypotting is some really bad advice that women come up with. It not only destroy trust but puts the relationship in an unstable footing. How can you be sure that even if he passed this time he won't later on in life? Are you gonna keep sending in honeypots for him all the time?

Marriage? Maybe the guy is secretly a buaya and courting TS just to bonk her. After bonking her a few times, the guy might get tired and dump her for a new target.

 

[Ash007]

Thank you very much Ash. Your advice will be heeded once I get an opportunity to have a good talk with him .

Sue just whatsapped me not so long ago and I asked if I am interested in employing the Honeytrapper. Cost is about $500 and it seems that the Honeytrapper can "tape" the conversation and play back for me too. I said No thanks in the meantime. She laughed and said "Hope you don't regret".

PS : Honeytrapping not Honeypotting

Sounds about the same to me. If he did it to you, its honeydicking.

http://schlemielintheory.com/2015/01/25/honey-dicked-and-honey-potted-a-reflection-on-seth-rogen-james-franco-and-a-few-motifs-in-the-interview/

Here’s the definition:

When a person is getting took. Somebody finding your ass out, figuring out what you like, telling you what you want to hear, to get what they want out of you. Honeydicking is refers to when a male does this act. Honeypotting refers to when a female does this act.

Marriage? Maybe the guy is secretly a buaya and courting TS just to bonk her. After bonking her a few times, the guy might get tired and dump her for a new target.

That is a real possibility. And I do think that is the concern of the TS.

 

[Victory2016]

I suspect she may be Claire......

 

[zhihau]

I suspect she may be Claire......

I still want my lunch, don't spoil it.