• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Do we really need to pay TOP earners that level of salary?

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
5,424
Points
0
There's the argument that u need to pay TOP earners more because they increase the size of the pie. Sure if the pie is growing everyone gets more and if the TOP r responsible then it's fair to give them more. But what if the pie is stagnant or shrinking?? If the TOP gets more, it means everyone gets less!! That's def NO K! So when we r going into a recession, the pie is shrinking, the income distribution have to readjusted so that the TOP gets less and everyone maintains. Agree? The problem is the TOP layer holds the balance of power so that whatever happens, they still come out on TOP!
 
Very silly of you. When pie is shrinking, you cut jobs. It is a very difficult thing to do, you know. That is why top earners need to be rewarded well for their work!
 
Very silly of you. When pie is shrinking, you cut jobs. It is a very difficult thing to do, you know. That is why top earners need to be rewarded well for their work!

When the pie is shrinking, u cut jobs- that's correct. But is it TOP jobs or lower level jobs??
 
When the pie is shrinking, u cut jobs- that's correct. But is it TOP jobs or lower level jobs??

That is of course up to the top dogs to decide lah. The proletariats are infinitely replaceable. On the other hand, a loyal minion is hard to come by.
 
top of the pie must be maintained at all times,otherwise its not called capitalism.if top of the pie shrinks thats called communism and communism is bad kay.
 
That is of course up to the top dogs to decide lah. The proletariats are infinitely replaceable. On the other hand, a loyal minion is hard to come by.

we can encourage a french revolution,where by guillotines is presented and the heads of the rich and aristocrats is chopped off to answer for the woes of the country's economy.
 
we can encourage a french revolution,where by guillotines is presented and the heads of the rich and aristocrats is chopped off to answer for the woes of the country's economy.

May not be such a bad idea. The way society is heading, we r going back to the days of the French Revolution! The rich is getting richer and the poor poorer.
 
Back
Top