- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 26
- Points
- 0
gaylish..............
The second largest Ponzi Scam in singapore after CPF ?!
There is no denying that my family and I are blessed and privileged to be staying at the property
The second largest Ponzi Scam in singapore after CPF ?!
NCC will give a good fight to CHC for the no. 2 position.
Isnt that pastor prince was stated to worth USD50 mil by Forbes mag?
NCC will give a good fight to CHC for the no. 2 position.
Isnt that pastor prince was stated to worth USD50 mil by Forbes mag?
"Pastor Prince" is in reality a bayi singh and started out as a computer repairman. Guess he suddenly got the "call" and used his charisma to rake in millions from the morons who flocked like sheep to hear his "stairway to heaven" pitch.
....ahaha...his arse is now on fire and he tries to douse the flame by denying all and everything written about him...if the article is not correct, why not sue?
rogue pastor of CHC still drawing in big bucks from his goons flocks ?
"Dr Paul Choo Warns People Against Kong Hee’s Ministry: “This is NOT Christianity. This is NOT the gospel. This is a SCAM.”
Dr Paul Choo, (the founder of Goducate), gave a lecture titled “The Prosperity Gospel Message”. This lecture examined the pyramid scheme structure of CHC. Below the video are quotes from his lecture.
The second largest Ponzi Scam in singapore after CPF ?!
Last time i checked they still have a substantial membership base. I must say CHC is really resilient. After a smear campaign from the national media they still make it out pretty good.
Like TT Durai?
At its peak they had 33k followers.
Now still can command about 6-7k followers.....these are the diehard hardcore ones.
No joke Con Hee is a successful conman any way you look at it.
That's a classic rags to riches story right there
What did his response say about
1) His house furniture is lavish to ordinary folks but to him its sup sup water.
The fact that he does own a 10 million sentosa pethouse is already 'lavish' and 'extravagant'. what is there to deny. In any case, his retort letter bear little defense.
Kong Hee
6 mins ·
I refer to the newspaper article “City Harvest Church founder Kong Hee puts Sentosa Cove home for sale for $10m” by Joyce Lim published in The Straits Times on 2 July 2015.
I was surprised by the contents of the article. Significant portions of the said article are misleading and exaggerated.
At the outset, I note that the “investor” quoted in the article is unnamed and anonymous.
The property that my family and I have been temporarily living in is co-owned with another family. We have been living at this property with the co-owner’s kind permission after we had to sell our properties in order to pay the legal expenses for the ongoing trial.
The article quotes the “investor” using superlative terms to describe my property, implying that its furnishings are grandiose and luxurious. I am unaware of the intentions and motives of the “investor”, but my family and I would respectfully disagree with the particular nuances in which the article and the “investor” mischievously seek to portray. I am puzzled why the furniture in the apartment is described as allegedly “lavish or opulent”, when it is not.
There is no denying that my family and I are blessed and privileged to be staying at the property. However, my family and I are under no illusion that this is only our temporary home, until the property is sold. The article has given the impression that this property was only just put up for sale. On the contrary, the co-owner and I have been trying to sell this property for some time.
I am particularly surprised by the reference in the article that the “investor” has “the impression that the owner sure knows how to enjoy the high life”. I do not intend to dignify this assertion by responding to this, suffice to say that those who know and are around me, my family and friends, know perfectly well what we have gone through over the past 5 years, and what we continue to go through today.
Lastly, I am shocked by the alleged offer made by the agent to take the “investor” out on the owner’s “yacht”. I do not, and have never owned a yacht. As far as I am aware, the co-owner, who does not live in Singapore, also does not own a yacht.