• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Keppel Club probe reveals $37m loss

GG789

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
195
Points
0
http://news.omy.sg/News/Local-News/story20150424-341794

SOME $37 million is estimated to have been lost in an alleged membership fraud at Keppel Club, as a result of fake transfers and duping applicants into paying someone else, when they thought they were paying the club, said a probe report.

As of last month, "irregularities" were detected in 1,340 membership transfers at the club spanning a decade from 2004, said the report.

Singapore's oldest country club, Keppel was rocked last year by revelations of the fraud, which led to the sacking of the alleged principal culprit, a 67-year-old woman who started as a clerk in 1966 and rose to supervise its membership department.

Documents filed in court earlier this month show Keppel had appointed the DHA+pac firm last November to conduct forensic investigations into areas, including the modus operandi and extent of the fraud, as well as the potential damage and loss suffered by the club.

Among other things, the affected membership transfers were not mentioned at management meetings by the alleged culprit.

Applicants who sought to join the club were directed to the 67-year-old, who would prepare a form with the genuine details of the applicant. But when it came to details of the person transferring his or her club membership, she would allegedly fill in a fabricated name, or the data of former members instead. She would also fabricate a signature for the purported transferor.

The club stopped issuing new memberships in 1996, but a membership could be bought from someone willing to sell his membership through the club.

Based on the probe findings, Keppel has hired a team of Lee & Lee lawyers led by Julian Tay to sue the woman and six others, to account for the damages.

A High Court pre-trial conference is due next month.

Signs of something being amiss first emerged when the woman, who oversaw the membership department for more than 30 years, expressed strong resistance, when management suggested in 2013 that someone understudy her. The woman had already passed 62 years of age in 2009.

She reluctantly agreed but insisted on retaining control over membership transfers, claiming the complex job would require at least two years for her successor to take over.

The club then promoted an assistant manager in July last year to understudy her.

But the assistant uncovered irregularities in the membership records. Among other things, she found two membership files that were started last year, but had no records of payment of transfer fees in relation to the purported membership transfers. The signatures of the purported transferors were also strikingly identical.

She also found that the names and details of these supposed members were not found in the club's membership database.

Discreet checks and prompt internal investigations followed.

When queried by the general manager on the irregularities in nine membership files which showed no record of transfer fee payment, the woman failed to give a proper explanation.

Within the next few days, the club received seven cashier's orders and two cheques for the purported payment of the nine membership files which the alleged culprit was asked about earlier.

But four of the cashier's orders had consecutive reference numbers, suggesting that they were issued by the same person. The orders were also issued days after the suspect was first queried by the general manager.

Such an apparent cover-up led the club to suspend her and lodge a police report.

The club has since been informed that its former employee is currently being investigated by the police for possible offences, said the court documents filed.

[email protected]
 
Never leave an employee in the same position for too long. 2 years max.
 
How about a politician-the damage would be far worst .

When it comes to politicians, the electorate is the check and balance. In NZ max 2 to 3 terms and the electorate will then vote for a change of government.
 
Never leave an employee in the same position for too long. 2 years max.

Singaporeans must learn not to let one party govern Singapore for too long. Also never let a PM stay for more than two terms. Whatever vision he has for SG, he wld have done them. He is not going to do things he has not done in his 10years as PM.

The problems we have in SG are because PAP has been govt for 50years and LHL has been PM for 10years.

Time for change
 
Singaporeans must learn not to let one party govern Singapore for too long. Also never let a PM stay for more than two terms. Whatever vision he has for SG, he wld have done them. He is not going to do things he has not done in his 10years as PM

I agree 100%.
 
I couldn't care less what he thinks.

You are being sinkified. Most Singaporeans don't care what LHL said or think. Welcome to the club.

Now you know why I said the demise of pap is well on the way
 
You are being sinkified. Most Singaporeans don't care what LHL said or think. Welcome to the club.

Now you know why I said the demise of pap is well on the way

Nothing to do with being sinkified. I think PAP is the best but in order for singaporeans to realise that, they should vote the WP to power for the next election and give them a try.

After 5 years they'll be begging LHL to come back.
 
Nothing to do with being sinkified. I think PAP is the best but in order for singaporeans to realise that, they should vote the WP to power for the next election and give them a try.

After 5 years they'll be begging LHL to come back.

I agree after the pap SG will suffer many lean years. But it is not the fault of the new govt. Discerning Singaporeans know that SG is in trouble and will continue to go downhill from now on. A new govt will not be able to arrest this trend and we are prepared for hard times ahead.

But the sooner the transition the better it is for SG.

The pap is the past. If we look to the past, we are not going to make progress in the future.

Singapore needs a new team with new vision. More of the present and the past will sink us
 
Back
Top