- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 35,727
- Points
- 113
Perhaps this is why Pinky tried very hard to appeal to the youths.
![]()
He knew his bid to woo the post-65ers fell flat, that's why he needs more protection this time round for the post-80s



Perhaps this is why Pinky tried very hard to appeal to the youths.
![]()
Let me tell you an ugly truth.
Overwhelming majority of senior citizens will vote for PAP, and will continue to vote for PAP no matter what. For them, they saw PAP lead Singapore from Third World to First. This means a lot to them. From walking on muddy paths and riding bicycle to walk to now driving or taking aircon MRT, from wooden attap kampung to high rise buildings and shopping malls.
One of my nephews is a civil servant who did election officer duty before. When senior citizens come to vote, some of them, being illiterate, would show him their voting slip and ask in mandarin or dialet, which is 雷 公 (PAP)? My nephew would point it out and ask if they wish to know who was the opposition candidate. A lot of times, they would say, 'No need to know. I only want to vote for 雷 公. I not interested in opposition at all.' And this happened a lot of times.
Even amongst the younger people, the bulk of your supporters are just disgruntled sinkies who cannot hack it in the real world, some some disgruntled civil servant like Tan Jee Say who did not get the promotion he desired.
Opposition is screwed. As long as vast majority of sinkies are earning well, you opposition complaint queen cannot hope to topple PAP.
i had no idea u had to be literate to vote for PAP.i thought its just two boxes on the voting slip one with PAP logo and the other with opposition.u telling the old folks dont even have the slightest clue who they voting for?
Perhaps this is why Pinky tried very hard to appeal to the youths.
![]()
I just telling you what my nephew told me. But the general sentiments of the pioneer generation is that they vote for PAP because that's the party they literally grew up with. Kinda like comrade in arms in making Singapore a developed country. Many of the older generations were also influenced by the trade unions and grassroots or some cultural group, which usually are chaired by PAP people too. In contrast, the Workers' Party has nothing to do with labour movement as far as most people know it. It's just a name that has no significance as a "workers" party.
did they see NTUC evolving from a trade union in the 70s and 80s chaired by ong teng cheong and hokkien and teochew unionists to a supermarket giant today and a major player in the food court industry?
Let me tell you an ugly truth.
Overwhelming majority of senior citizens will vote for PAP, and will continue to vote for PAP no matter what. For them, they saw PAP lead Singapore from Third World to First. This means a lot to them. From walking on muddy paths and riding bicycle to walk to now driving or taking aircon MRT, from wooden attap kampung to high rise buildings and shopping malls.
One of my nephews is a civil servant who did election officer duty before. When senior citizens come to vote, some of them, being illiterate, would show him their voting slip and ask in mandarin or dialet, which is 雷 公 (PAP)? My nephew would point it out and ask if they wish to know who was the opposition candidate. A lot of times, they would say, 'No need to know. I only want to vote for 雷 公. I not interested in opposition at all.' And this happened a lot of times.
Even amongst the younger people, the bulk of your supporters are just disgruntled sinkies who cannot hack it in the real world, some some disgruntled civil servant like Tan Jee Say who did not get the promotion he desired.
Opposition is screwed. As long as vast majority of sinkies are earning well, you opposition complaint queen cannot hope to topple PAP.
Do yrself a favour. Tell yr fictitious nephew all this posturing and brave talk is a lot of chest beating to drum up confidence in their own cadres and porlumpars.
I am a member of the senior citizenry and a beneficiary of the PGP. I'll tell you this: not a single one of my contemporary generation I know of has ever voted for the PAP, and neither are they ever going to start.
I have also heard similar discontentment from the younger gen.
If the PAP has so much confidence, why the need to come up with PGP and CPF changes now? How do you explain the groundswell of anger in Hougang and PE BEs?
Given that Singapore is ageing, I must assume that seniors were likely the swing voters. Everything you said is contradicted.
Top Ten Policies that Singaporeans have benefited in 2014! Look Foward to More in 2015!
The Ten Great Campaigns (Chinese: 十全武功; pinyin: shí quán wǔ gōng) were a series of wars fought during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor, much celebrated in the official Qing dynasty annals. They included three to enlarge the area of Qing control in Central Asia: two against the Zunghars (1755–1757) and the pacification of Xinjiang (1758–1759). The other seven campaigns were more in the nature of police actions on frontiers already established – two wars to suppress the Jinchuan rebels in Sichuan, another to suppress rebels in Taiwan (1787–1788), and four expeditions abroad against the Burmese (1765–1769), the Vietnamese (1788–1789), and the warlike Gurkhas in Nepal on the border between Tibet and India (1790–1792), the last counting as two.
In his later years, Qianlong referred to himself with the grandiose style name of "Old Man of the Ten Completed [Great Campaigns]" (十全老人). He also wrote an essay enumerating the victories in 1792 entitled "Record of Ten Completions" (十全记).[10]
The campaigns were major financial drain on Qing, costing more than 151 million taels of silver.[11]
The tribes at Jinchuan numbered less than 30,000 households and took five years to pacify.
Nearly 1.5 million piculs (1 picul = 100 catty) were transported for the Taiwan campaigns.
Instead of restoring Emperor Lê Mẫn Đế to the throne as the Vietnam campaign was intended, Qianlong ended up settling with the new Nguyen dynasty, and even arranging for imperial marriage between Qing and Nguyen.
You are quoting from a Parliamentary debate where PAP had near stranglehold of parliament. Almost all the seats were held by PAP MPs. And you are quoting from a PAP man who argued against a policy he did not agree. This is evidence that a PAP-dominated parliament is not a rubber stamp parliament. So, what's wrong with voting for PAP when PAP MPs do argue against policies they disagree with?
Perhaps this is why Pinky tried very hard to appeal to the youths.
![]()
This is another individual who should not be allowed to remain in Singapore.
Please do not renew his professional pass or work permit, and do not approve his application for Singapore citizenship, if he is a PR.
You wait long long. These people are the darlings of the PAP regime. We Sinkies will be told to be less xenophobic and instead be more tolerant of these FTs, for they have contributed much to the economy (read: the pappies' pockets).![]()
FTs = new citizens = more pappy votes . Period.![]()