A Cynical Investor or a few Cynical Investors?

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
2,783
Points
0
atans is a fork tongue and all along i suspect he is a mole planted by PAP
 
atans is a fork tongue and all along i suspect he is a mole planted by PAP

Glad you noticed too. GMS once said Atans was a "WP supporter critical of WP". Not only did it show his poor observation skills, he didn't realize they had less in common than he thought.

Jeremy Chen comes to mind. Claims to be a SDP member then criticizes the fundamentals of SDP.
 
He is neutral, just like me.

There is a difference between neutral and schizo. No one who says "PAP is corrupt" will say "PAP is perfect" even on a different day.
 
another fork tongue is Eugene Tan ex NMP

Poor guy, has being quiet lately...Think he is more worried about his tenure than anything else...

I also feel students doing political science here also worry about their grades if they don't write the RIGHT THINGS
if they don't say the RIGHT THINGS

Try speak and write like Chee Soon Juan.

Then, when convocation comes, you will not be there.
 
Glad you noticed too. GMS once said Atans was a "WP supporter critical of WP". Not only did it show his poor observation skills, he didn't realize they had less in common than he thought.

Jeremy Chen comes to mind. Claims to be a SDP member then criticizes the fundamentals of SDP.



Jeremy Chen said that for WP to win Punggol east, is even worse than should PAP have won Punggol east.

That alone tells you his mentality. In fact, a perfect representation of the SDP mentality.

Jeremy does not disagree with SDP at a root level. In fact, he has been radicalized by the extreme left wing fringe of SDP. So much so that when SDP veered toward the centre, he criticized SDP for doing so.

But at root level, he and Chee Soon Juan in fact share the same values although there is a great difference in the level of maturity of the expression of those values.
 
ATANS is a PAP mole. Period.

Jeremy Chen is not a mole, but lacks political maturity and the ability to see the woods for the trees. He's not been 'radicalized', but tends to have very simplistic, even reductionistic, views on economic and social issues, no doubt due to his mathematics background. That and the hubris of youth have led to his recent quite public disagreements with CSJ.
 
Back
Top