I will not know the actual accounts in all their detail and can only interpret/analyse from reports. Communism rose in China not as a result of a revolt by the urban proletariat (they are small in number compared to the agrarian peasants in the 40s)but the poor people's anger against the capitalist rich and land owners. Hence the violent reprisals against them, which would have been orchestrated/coordinated by the communist party members. I can guess that its probable that most people were not Communist party members, but the other player was Chiang Kai Shek's Nationalist party, who had the support of USA and further bolstered by the rich and city folk elite, so the masses would more likely identify with the Communists.
By choice, the Chinese (in fact, any human) would rather not be communist, but that's the way recent history took place in China and the party has come to stay to rule. It was my hope that Taiwan would rise and influence the mainland to revert to the Nationalist Party, but it is turning out to be the other way.
Cheers!
the Communists deceived the gullible and ignorant peasants. their promises of land to the peasants ( individual ownership ) became common land ownership under the CCP when they took power. the CCP's revolution succeeded on the back of Soviet Russian's money, material and guidance while the KMT was betrayed by the US. Communism was never the choice of the Chinese people. China was betrayed into Communism. that was the Chinese people's tragedy. the CCP erased it's atrocities, downplayed the Soviet help and greatly exaggerated the people's support to glorify their 1949 victory. the KMT has never properly tell its account of the events to the Chinese people and rest of the world till today. that period of Chinese history is well and truly screwed.