Govt spend $26.5mil for database but dispense only $102.4million to poor?

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
We refer to the article “National database that will speed up aid delivery to needy to be ready next year” (Straits Times, May 31).

National database of the needy?

It states that “Needy people who require help will get it more speedily when social service agencies start sharing a national database of information on aid recipients from the third quarter of next year.

Database cost $26.5m?

The tender to develop the system, called Social Service Net, was awarded to consultancy firm Accenture for $26.5 million, announced the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) on Friday.”

Costs of delivering social assistance?

- Reading the above gave us a sense of “discomfort”. Does it not perhaps indicate that we may have lost our sense of proportion in balancing the efficiency of the delivery of social assistance vis-a-vis the amount of financial assistance.

ComCare only spent $102.4 million in financial assistance to needy families a year. And we are spending $26.5 million on the database system?

What about the additional millions that are spent running the new social service offices and the existing family service centres, Community Development Councils (CDCs), etc?

Lead by example please?

As to the remarks “Close the income gap within each company by tweaking the wage shares of employees – “taking some from top management and giving them to those at the botttom” (“ESM Goh: Tweak employee wage shares in companies”, Sunday Times, Jun 1)

- Why don’t the Government take the lead by setting the example – Ministers and MPs take a pay cut, as well as spending some of the $36.1 billion Budget surplus in FY2012 according to the Department of Statistics using IMF fiscal reporting guidelines – on ComCare to give more help to more needy families?

SY Lee and Leong Sze Hian

http://therealsingapore.com/content/spend-265m-database-give-needy-1024m
 
We refer to the article “National database that will speed up aid delivery to needy to be ready next year” (Straits Times, May 31).

National database of the needy?

It states that “Needy people who require help will get it more speedily when social service agencies start sharing a national database of information on aid recipients from the third quarter of next year.

Database cost $26.5m?

The tender to develop the system, called Social Service Net, was awarded to consultancy firm Accenture for $26.5 million, announced the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) on Friday.”

Costs of delivering social assistance?

- Reading the above gave us a sense of “discomfort”. Does it not perhaps indicate that we may have lost our sense of proportion in balancing the efficiency of the delivery of social assistance vis-a-vis the amount of financial assistance.

ComCare only spent $102.4 million in financial assistance to needy families a year. And we are spending $26.5 million on the database system?

What about the additional millions that are spent running the new social service offices and the existing family service centres, Community Development Councils (CDCs), etc?

Lead by example please?

As to the remarks “Close the income gap within each company by tweaking the wage shares of employees – “taking some from top management and giving them to those at the botttom” (“ESM Goh: Tweak employee wage shares in companies”, Sunday Times, Jun 1)

- Why don’t the Government take the lead by setting the example – Ministers and MPs take a pay cut, as well as spending some of the $36.1 billion Budget surplus in FY2012 according to the Department of Statistics using IMF fiscal reporting guidelines – on ComCare to give more help to more needy families?

SY Lee and Leong Sze Hian

http://therealsingapore.com/content/spend-265m-database-give-needy-1024m

This is amazing. How many people needy clients are there such that you need a 26.5 million dollar system? Or is this mainly to cater to internal asscovering processes. I can bet you someone can build a complete Town Management system for APHTEC for half the cost.
 
The 26.5 million expenditure is an investment for the future. The savings the software generates over the long term will enable the government to allocate hundreds of millions more towards helping the low income groups.
 
The 26.5 million expenditure is an investment for the future. The savings the software generates over the long term will enable the government to allocate hundreds of millions more towards helping the low income groups.

It's an ffing DATABASE of a supposedly small number of poor people from one of the smallest nation states in the world which so happens to be one of the richest! Where is your ffing sense of proportion?
 
It's an ffing DATABASE of a supposedly small number of poor people from one of the smallest nation states in the world which so happens to be one of the richest! Where is your ffing sense of proportion?

The aim is to weed out the freeloaders so that the genuine needy get the care they rightly deserve.
 
The aim is to weed out the freeloaders so that the genuine needy get the care they rightly deserve.

The number of freeloaders have risen and their take home monthly ang pow has increased for the past many years.. Singaporeans have been fooled to think that freeloaders do not exist and that the government doesn't do anything for them. You can be assured that thousands of Singapore children will have only one meal a day if their parents didn't freeload. You should come home and spend some time in Singapore Sam.

But lets not digress. We are takling about a very expensive database for a very small number of people. There is also no indication that the software is able to weedout freeloaders. Which hole in your body did you dig out this precious infomation from?
 
26 millions for consultation fees. 0.5 million for actual hardware and software?
 
The aim is to weed out the freeloaders so that the genuine needy get the care they rightly deserve.

Actually I think it is to produce kueh lapis like CCS described. To make sure nobody gets a cent beyond mere survival.
 
I remember that the PAP was giving some Aussie company $$$ to study ways to improve Spore's public bus system.

Anyone know the outcome:confused:
 
Back
Top