Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry on CPF

[scroobal]

It's has come to a stage where a commission of inquiry is needed to resolve this mess. CJ Tan as someone aptly out that he practically regurgitated what was on the website and published it last Sunday.

The terms of reference should include

1) Acceptable real rate of return compared to the Industry
2) identify parties that benefit from the use of CPF funds in the investment area
3) The effect of the minimum sum and the withdrawal age on members.

A formal inquiry will force transparency and accountability both which has not been forthcoming. If this Government has nothing to hide and are prepared to stand by their programme they should not fear an inquiry into CPF.

 

[enterprise2]

It's has come to a stage where a commission of inquiry is needed to resolve this mess. CJ Tan as someone aptly out that he practically regurgitated what was on the website and published it last Sunday.

The terms of reference should include

1) Acceptable real rate of return compared to the Industry
2) identify parties that benefit from the use of CPF funds in the investment area
3) The effect of the minimum sum and the withdrawal age on members.

A formal inquiry will force transparency and accountability both which has not been forthcoming. If this Government has nothing to hide and are prepared to stand by their programme they should not fear an inquiry into CPF.

U kidding! Rite! We all know what the findings will be ...even b4 COI is formed!!

 

[kingrant]

You want any exclusion clause as to the Chmn of the Inquiry? Anything against Gerard Ee again as Chmn?

It's has come to a stage where a commission of inquiry is needed to resolve this mess. CJ Tan as someone aptly out that he practically regurgitated what was on the website and published it last Sunday.

The terms of reference should include

1) Acceptable real rate of return compared to the Industry
2) identify parties that benefit from the use of CPF funds in the investment area
3) The effect of the minimum sum and the withdrawal age on members.

A formal inquiry will force transparency and accountability both which has not been forthcoming. If this Government has nothing to hide and are prepared to stand by their programme they should not fear an inquiry into CPF.

 

[Sinkie]

It's has come to a stage where a commission of inquiry is needed to resolve this mess. CJ Tan as someone aptly out that he practically regurgitated what was on the website and published it last Sunday.

The terms of reference should include

1) Acceptable real rate of return compared to the Industry
2) identify parties that benefit from the use of CPF funds in the investment area
3) The effect of the minimum sum and the withdrawal age on members.

A formal inquiry will force transparency and accountability both which has not been forthcoming. If this Government has nothing to hide and are prepared to stand by their programme they should not fear an inquiry into CPF.

This matter is not a subject for COI. It is a subject for a national referendum.
The issue is very simple: Return our CPF at age 55, as originally promised.

Why so much wayang for?

 

[dr.wailing]

It's has come to a stage where a commission of inquiry is needed to resolve this mess. CJ Tan as someone aptly out that he practically regurgitated what was on the website and published it last Sunday.

scroobal,

Are you all right?

Even if LHL brought in experts from abroad to participate in the COI, opened the books of Temasick and GIC, Sinkies who are in their right mind would never accept the COI findings.

Why?

Because CPF funds are our money. Why should we have to ask permission from LHL on how we ought to spend our money?

scroobal, do you have to ask LHL permission to buy properties in Sinkapore or overseas?